妊娠期抗 D 以外的红细胞异体抗体的意义及其对新生儿的影响:病例系列

Sweta Nayak
{"title":"妊娠期抗 D 以外的红细胞异体抗体的意义及其对新生儿的影响:病例系列","authors":"Sweta Nayak","doi":"10.18231/j.ijogr.2023.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contrary to well-established guidelines in developed countries, awareness regarding red cell alloantibodies in antenatal period are lacking in India. Investigating for indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) is mostly limited to the Rh D negative antenatal cases. This case series revisits this vital aspect of maternal and fetal safety. Instances of alloantibody other than anti-D are reported.Study was done in Transfusion Medicine department of a tertiary care hospital in North India during 2019-2020. IAT was performed not during the 1st or 2nd trimesters of pregnancy but as a routine compatibility test during delivery. Patients with positive IAT were further evaluated for the detection of alloantibody by using identification panel red cells. Result: Eight antenatal cases with irregular antibodies other than anti-D during 2019-2020 are described. Antibodies detected per patient were single (three cases of anti-E, one of anti-Fya, one of anti-M) or multiple (two cases of anti-E plus anti-c, one of anti-E plus anti-K). Direct antiglobulin test of four babies born to these mothers was found to be positive, one of whom was still born and rest recovered with medical management. Two other babies had DAT negative and two mothers presented late after still birth. Alloantibody titer indicated in patient with anti-E during mid-pregnancy had titer was undetectable by standard tube technique.Non anti-D alloantibodies can potentially affect fetus, asserting equal attention as anti-D. IAT should not be missed in pregnancy as it is common to investigations for compatibility as well as for fetal wellbeing assessment.","PeriodicalId":13288,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significance of red cell alloantibodies other than anti-D during pregnancy and their effect on the newborn: A case series\",\"authors\":\"Sweta Nayak\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijogr.2023.100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contrary to well-established guidelines in developed countries, awareness regarding red cell alloantibodies in antenatal period are lacking in India. Investigating for indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) is mostly limited to the Rh D negative antenatal cases. This case series revisits this vital aspect of maternal and fetal safety. Instances of alloantibody other than anti-D are reported.Study was done in Transfusion Medicine department of a tertiary care hospital in North India during 2019-2020. IAT was performed not during the 1st or 2nd trimesters of pregnancy but as a routine compatibility test during delivery. Patients with positive IAT were further evaluated for the detection of alloantibody by using identification panel red cells. Result: Eight antenatal cases with irregular antibodies other than anti-D during 2019-2020 are described. Antibodies detected per patient were single (three cases of anti-E, one of anti-Fya, one of anti-M) or multiple (two cases of anti-E plus anti-c, one of anti-E plus anti-K). Direct antiglobulin test of four babies born to these mothers was found to be positive, one of whom was still born and rest recovered with medical management. Two other babies had DAT negative and two mothers presented late after still birth. Alloantibody titer indicated in patient with anti-E during mid-pregnancy had titer was undetectable by standard tube technique.Non anti-D alloantibodies can potentially affect fetus, asserting equal attention as anti-D. IAT should not be missed in pregnancy as it is common to investigations for compatibility as well as for fetal wellbeing assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2023.100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2023.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与发达国家完善的指导方针相反,印度对产前红细胞异体抗体缺乏认识。对间接抗球蛋白试验(IAT)的调查大多仅限于 Rh D 阴性的产前病例。本系列病例重新审视了母体和胎儿安全的这一重要方面。研究于 2019-2020 年期间在北印度一家三级医院的输血医学科进行。IAT 并非在妊娠的前三个月或后三个月进行,而是作为分娩时的常规相容性检测。对 IAT 呈阳性的患者进行了进一步评估,以使用鉴定板红细胞检测异体抗体。结果本报告描述了 2019-2020 年期间出现抗 D 以外不规则抗体的 8 例产前病例。每位患者检测到的抗体均为单一抗体(3 例抗-E、1 例抗-Fya、1 例抗-M)或多重抗体(2 例抗-E 加抗、1 例抗-E 加抗-K)。这些母亲所生的四名婴儿的直接抗球蛋白试验呈阳性,其中一名婴儿仍在出生,其余婴儿经药物治疗后痊愈。另外两名婴儿的直接抗球蛋白试验呈阴性,两名母亲在死产后很晚才出现症状。非抗 D 型异体抗体可能会影响胎儿,因此需要与抗 D 型异体抗体同等重视。妊娠期不应该错过 IAT,因为它是检查相容性和评估胎儿健康的常用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Significance of red cell alloantibodies other than anti-D during pregnancy and their effect on the newborn: A case series
Contrary to well-established guidelines in developed countries, awareness regarding red cell alloantibodies in antenatal period are lacking in India. Investigating for indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) is mostly limited to the Rh D negative antenatal cases. This case series revisits this vital aspect of maternal and fetal safety. Instances of alloantibody other than anti-D are reported.Study was done in Transfusion Medicine department of a tertiary care hospital in North India during 2019-2020. IAT was performed not during the 1st or 2nd trimesters of pregnancy but as a routine compatibility test during delivery. Patients with positive IAT were further evaluated for the detection of alloantibody by using identification panel red cells. Result: Eight antenatal cases with irregular antibodies other than anti-D during 2019-2020 are described. Antibodies detected per patient were single (three cases of anti-E, one of anti-Fya, one of anti-M) or multiple (two cases of anti-E plus anti-c, one of anti-E plus anti-K). Direct antiglobulin test of four babies born to these mothers was found to be positive, one of whom was still born and rest recovered with medical management. Two other babies had DAT negative and two mothers presented late after still birth. Alloantibody titer indicated in patient with anti-E during mid-pregnancy had titer was undetectable by standard tube technique.Non anti-D alloantibodies can potentially affect fetus, asserting equal attention as anti-D. IAT should not be missed in pregnancy as it is common to investigations for compatibility as well as for fetal wellbeing assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The sequence of acrania–exencephaly–anencephaly (AEAS)- An infrequent case report Complications of placenta previa: A retrospective observational study at tertiary care hospital A comparative study between dinoprostone pessary and dinoprostone gel for induction of labor and neonatal outcome Behind the veil of anemia: Assessment of iron, folic acid, and vitamin B12 deficiencies and their association with red cell indices in anemic and non-anemic women Management of iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy in India: A review of current practices and challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1