延长孕期筛查(EFTS)在筛查非整倍体和预测先兆子痫中的作用

Anima Anjani, Gunjan Rai, Gargi Vikas Sharma, Shivani Rajouraya, Sunil Kumar Chaudhary
{"title":"延长孕期筛查(EFTS)在筛查非整倍体和预测先兆子痫中的作用","authors":"Anima Anjani, Gunjan Rai, Gargi Vikas Sharma, Shivani Rajouraya, Sunil Kumar Chaudhary","doi":"10.18231/j.ijogr.2023.085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": To assess the role of extended first trimester screening (EFTS) in early detection and management of preeclampsia.: A total of 501 parturients (aged 18-49 years; GA 11-13 weeks) underwent ETFS quadruple test that included age, sonographic data (CRL, Nuchal Tube (NT), ductus venosus PI) and biochemical tests (b-hCG, Alpha-fetoprotein, PLGF and PAPP-A for Trisomy 21, 18 and 13) levels. All the women were followed up for preeclampsia. Role of independent as well as combined ETFS predictors was assessed for prediction of preeclampsia employing independent samples ‘t’- and Fisher exact tests. ROC analysis was performed for continuous predictors significantly associated with preeclampsia risk. Results have been depicted in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of different ETFS risk predictors.Meanage of women was 28.07±4.77 years. Quadruple test was negative in 422 (84.2%). It was positive for Down’s syndrome/T21 in 23 (4.6%), T21 with increased PLGF in 8 (1.6%) and increased PLGF only in 48 (9.6%) cases. A total of 14 (2.8%) women developed preeclampsia. Older age, T21 risk, PLGF risk and any quadruple test abnormality were significantly associated with preeclampsia (p<0.05). On ROC analysis, the area under the curve value of age for prediction of preeclampsia was 0.940. Among different EFTS risks, age had maximum sensitivity (100%) and specificity (88.3%). Overall quadruple test was 71.4% sensitive and 85.8% specific in prediction of preeclampsia.: EFTS was a useful strategy for reducing the burden of preeclampsia.","PeriodicalId":13288,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of extended first trimester screening (EFTS) in screening of aneuploidy and prediction of pre-eclampsia\",\"authors\":\"Anima Anjani, Gunjan Rai, Gargi Vikas Sharma, Shivani Rajouraya, Sunil Kumar Chaudhary\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijogr.2023.085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": To assess the role of extended first trimester screening (EFTS) in early detection and management of preeclampsia.: A total of 501 parturients (aged 18-49 years; GA 11-13 weeks) underwent ETFS quadruple test that included age, sonographic data (CRL, Nuchal Tube (NT), ductus venosus PI) and biochemical tests (b-hCG, Alpha-fetoprotein, PLGF and PAPP-A for Trisomy 21, 18 and 13) levels. All the women were followed up for preeclampsia. Role of independent as well as combined ETFS predictors was assessed for prediction of preeclampsia employing independent samples ‘t’- and Fisher exact tests. ROC analysis was performed for continuous predictors significantly associated with preeclampsia risk. Results have been depicted in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of different ETFS risk predictors.Meanage of women was 28.07±4.77 years. Quadruple test was negative in 422 (84.2%). It was positive for Down’s syndrome/T21 in 23 (4.6%), T21 with increased PLGF in 8 (1.6%) and increased PLGF only in 48 (9.6%) cases. A total of 14 (2.8%) women developed preeclampsia. Older age, T21 risk, PLGF risk and any quadruple test abnormality were significantly associated with preeclampsia (p<0.05). On ROC analysis, the area under the curve value of age for prediction of preeclampsia was 0.940. Among different EFTS risks, age had maximum sensitivity (100%) and specificity (88.3%). Overall quadruple test was 71.4% sensitive and 85.8% specific in prediction of preeclampsia.: EFTS was a useful strategy for reducing the burden of preeclampsia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2023.085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2023.085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:目的:评估延长孕期筛查(EFTS)在早期发现和管理子痫前期中的作用。 方法:对 501 名产妇(年龄在 18-49 岁之间;孕期 11-13 周)进行 ETFS 四项检查,包括年龄、超声波数据(CRL、颈管(NT)、静脉导管 PI)和生化检查(b-hCG、甲胎蛋白、PLGF 和 PAPP-A,以检测 21、18 和 13 三体综合征)水平。所有妇女都接受了子痫前期随访。通过独立样本 "t "检验和费舍尔精确检验,评估了独立和综合 ETFS 预测因子在预测子痫前期方面的作用。对与子痫前期风险显著相关的连续预测因子进行了 ROC 分析。结果显示了不同 ETFS 风险预测指标的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值。422人(84.2%)的四项检测结果为阴性。23例(4.6%)唐氏综合征/T21阳性,8例(1.6%)T21和PLGF增高阳性,48例(9.6%)仅PLGF增高阳性。共有 14 名(2.8%)妇女出现子痫前期。高龄、T21 风险、PLGF 风险和任何四项检测异常都与子痫前期显著相关(P<0.05)。根据 ROC 分析,年龄预测子痫前期的曲线下面积值为 0.940。在不同的 EFTS 风险中,年龄的灵敏度(100%)和特异性(88.3%)最高。总体而言,四重检测对子痫前期预测的敏感度为 71.4%,特异度为 85.8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role of extended first trimester screening (EFTS) in screening of aneuploidy and prediction of pre-eclampsia
: To assess the role of extended first trimester screening (EFTS) in early detection and management of preeclampsia.: A total of 501 parturients (aged 18-49 years; GA 11-13 weeks) underwent ETFS quadruple test that included age, sonographic data (CRL, Nuchal Tube (NT), ductus venosus PI) and biochemical tests (b-hCG, Alpha-fetoprotein, PLGF and PAPP-A for Trisomy 21, 18 and 13) levels. All the women were followed up for preeclampsia. Role of independent as well as combined ETFS predictors was assessed for prediction of preeclampsia employing independent samples ‘t’- and Fisher exact tests. ROC analysis was performed for continuous predictors significantly associated with preeclampsia risk. Results have been depicted in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of different ETFS risk predictors.Meanage of women was 28.07±4.77 years. Quadruple test was negative in 422 (84.2%). It was positive for Down’s syndrome/T21 in 23 (4.6%), T21 with increased PLGF in 8 (1.6%) and increased PLGF only in 48 (9.6%) cases. A total of 14 (2.8%) women developed preeclampsia. Older age, T21 risk, PLGF risk and any quadruple test abnormality were significantly associated with preeclampsia (p<0.05). On ROC analysis, the area under the curve value of age for prediction of preeclampsia was 0.940. Among different EFTS risks, age had maximum sensitivity (100%) and specificity (88.3%). Overall quadruple test was 71.4% sensitive and 85.8% specific in prediction of preeclampsia.: EFTS was a useful strategy for reducing the burden of preeclampsia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The sequence of acrania–exencephaly–anencephaly (AEAS)- An infrequent case report Complications of placenta previa: A retrospective observational study at tertiary care hospital A comparative study between dinoprostone pessary and dinoprostone gel for induction of labor and neonatal outcome Behind the veil of anemia: Assessment of iron, folic acid, and vitamin B12 deficiencies and their association with red cell indices in anemic and non-anemic women Management of iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy in India: A review of current practices and challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1