减少腐败的公共采购与社会的关系:印度尼西亚的经验教训

Satria Unggul Wicaksana Prakasa, A. Hariri, Hilman Syahrial Haq, Adhy Riadhy Arafah, Muallimin Mochammad Sahid
{"title":"减少腐败的公共采购与社会的关系:印度尼西亚的经验教训","authors":"Satria Unggul Wicaksana Prakasa, A. Hariri, Hilman Syahrial Haq, Adhy Riadhy Arafah, Muallimin Mochammad Sahid","doi":"10.15294/lesrev.v7i2.72630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study addresses the susceptibility to corruption within Indonesia's National Budget (APBN) in the Procurement of Goods and Services, emphasizing the potential for misallocation across regions. Significant scholarly contributions, particularly from researchers in Indonesia and international, set the stage for an in-depth exploration of preventive measures against public procurement corruption. Employing a Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach, this study integrates community solidarity into the corruption prevention model. Hybrid data collection methods, including questionnaires, interviews, and focus group discussions (FGDs), were employed. Emphasizing the critical role of e-procurement, the study advocates for its transparent and accountable application to deter corruption. To fortify prevention, the study recommends mandatory declarations from tender participants, coupled with an enhanced auction rebuttal mechanism throughout the procurement stages. This preventative framework also underscores the importance of civilian, academic, and journalistic supervision to anticipate corruption and conflicts of interest. Recognizing the nuanced nature of fraud patterns at the provincial level, the study suggests a region-specific approach to maximizing e-procurement. This regional focus aligns with the study's emphasis on the involvement of relevant agencies operating at the local level. In essence, this research contributes a targeted analysis to complement existing literature, aiming to curb corruption in public procurement through strategic preventive measures.","PeriodicalId":292299,"journal":{"name":"Lex Scientia Law Review","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Procurement Nexus Social for Mitigate the Corruption: Lesson from Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Satria Unggul Wicaksana Prakasa, A. Hariri, Hilman Syahrial Haq, Adhy Riadhy Arafah, Muallimin Mochammad Sahid\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/lesrev.v7i2.72630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study addresses the susceptibility to corruption within Indonesia's National Budget (APBN) in the Procurement of Goods and Services, emphasizing the potential for misallocation across regions. Significant scholarly contributions, particularly from researchers in Indonesia and international, set the stage for an in-depth exploration of preventive measures against public procurement corruption. Employing a Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach, this study integrates community solidarity into the corruption prevention model. Hybrid data collection methods, including questionnaires, interviews, and focus group discussions (FGDs), were employed. Emphasizing the critical role of e-procurement, the study advocates for its transparent and accountable application to deter corruption. To fortify prevention, the study recommends mandatory declarations from tender participants, coupled with an enhanced auction rebuttal mechanism throughout the procurement stages. This preventative framework also underscores the importance of civilian, academic, and journalistic supervision to anticipate corruption and conflicts of interest. Recognizing the nuanced nature of fraud patterns at the provincial level, the study suggests a region-specific approach to maximizing e-procurement. This regional focus aligns with the study's emphasis on the involvement of relevant agencies operating at the local level. In essence, this research contributes a targeted analysis to complement existing literature, aiming to curb corruption in public procurement through strategic preventive measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lex Scientia Law Review\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lex Scientia Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i2.72630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Scientia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i2.72630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了印度尼西亚国家预算(APBN)在货物和服务采购中容易出现的腐败问题,强调了跨地区错误分配的可能性。特别是来自印尼和国际研究人员的重要学术贡献,为深入探讨预防公共采购腐败的措施奠定了基础。本研究采用参与式行动研究(PAR)方法,将社区团结融入腐败预防模式。研究采用了混合数据收集方法,包括问卷调查、访谈和焦点小组讨论 (FGD)。本研究强调了电子采购的关键作用,主张以透明、负责任的方式应用电子采购来遏制腐败。为加强预防,研究建议强制要求投标参与者申报,并在整个采购阶段加强拍卖反驳机制。这一预防框架还强调了民间、学术和新闻监督对预测腐败和利益冲突的重要性。认识到省级欺诈模式的细微差别,研究建议采用针对特定地区的方法,最大限度地利用电子采购。这一地区重点与本研究强调地方一级相关机构的参与相一致。从本质上讲,本研究为补充现有文献提供了有针对性的分析,旨在通过战略性预防措施遏制公共采购中的腐败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Public Procurement Nexus Social for Mitigate the Corruption: Lesson from Indonesia
This study addresses the susceptibility to corruption within Indonesia's National Budget (APBN) in the Procurement of Goods and Services, emphasizing the potential for misallocation across regions. Significant scholarly contributions, particularly from researchers in Indonesia and international, set the stage for an in-depth exploration of preventive measures against public procurement corruption. Employing a Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach, this study integrates community solidarity into the corruption prevention model. Hybrid data collection methods, including questionnaires, interviews, and focus group discussions (FGDs), were employed. Emphasizing the critical role of e-procurement, the study advocates for its transparent and accountable application to deter corruption. To fortify prevention, the study recommends mandatory declarations from tender participants, coupled with an enhanced auction rebuttal mechanism throughout the procurement stages. This preventative framework also underscores the importance of civilian, academic, and journalistic supervision to anticipate corruption and conflicts of interest. Recognizing the nuanced nature of fraud patterns at the provincial level, the study suggests a region-specific approach to maximizing e-procurement. This regional focus aligns with the study's emphasis on the involvement of relevant agencies operating at the local level. In essence, this research contributes a targeted analysis to complement existing literature, aiming to curb corruption in public procurement through strategic preventive measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Positivization of Fatwas of the National Sharia Council of the Indonesian Ulema Council in the Sharia Banking Law: Problems and Challenges Land Subsidence Policy in the Context of Good Governance Principles (Comparing Indonesia and Japan) Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Vietnam’s New Generation Free Trade Agreements – Challenges and Recommendations Rejection of Former Shia Community in Sampang Perspective on Human Rights Law: Discourse of Religious Rights and Freedom in Indonesia Comparative Analysis Between Employees Provident Fund (EPF) & Private Retirement Scheme (PRS) in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1