新加坡和韩国的多元文化教育与教师的多元文化教学能力研究

Q2 Arts and Humanities rEFLections Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.61508/refl.v30i3.268950
Changju Wu, Nannaphat Saenghong, Omsin Jatuporn
{"title":"新加坡和韩国的多元文化教育与教师的多元文化教学能力研究","authors":"Changju Wu, Nannaphat Saenghong, Omsin Jatuporn","doi":"10.61508/refl.v30i3.268950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines multicultural education policies in Singapore and South Korea, analyzing their approaches within their unique sociopolitical and sociocultural contexts. This study also discusses the implications of the approaches used in both nations’ policies on multicultural teaching competence. Using government policy documents related to multicultural education in Singapore and South Korea, the collected data was analyzed using critical discourse analysis (CDA) and interpreted with the theory of five approaches to multicultural education by Sleeter and Grant (1999). The five approaches include 1) Teaching the Exceptional and Culturally Different, 2) Human Relations, 3) Single-Group Studies, 4) Multicultural Education, and 5) Education that is Multicultural and Social Reconstructionist. The findings illuminate the two nations’ distinct national stances and trajectories in the realm of multicultural education while concurrently identifying a shared commitment to the Multicultural Education approach within the policy documents of both. In Singapore, a combination of Human Relations, Single-Group Studies, and Multicultural Education is deeply embedded throughout the nation’s policy discourses. Conversely, South Korea’s attempts at multicultural education present an evolving narrative, shifting from a conservative perspective rooted in Teaching the Exceptional and Culturally Different to a more liberal stance deeply grounded in the tenets of the Multicultural Education approach. This study emphasizes the importance of sociocultural and sociopolitical context in shaping a government’s approach to multicultural education.","PeriodicalId":36332,"journal":{"name":"rEFLections","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Study of Multicultural Education and Teachers’ Multicultural Teaching Competency in Singapore and South Korea\",\"authors\":\"Changju Wu, Nannaphat Saenghong, Omsin Jatuporn\",\"doi\":\"10.61508/refl.v30i3.268950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines multicultural education policies in Singapore and South Korea, analyzing their approaches within their unique sociopolitical and sociocultural contexts. This study also discusses the implications of the approaches used in both nations’ policies on multicultural teaching competence. Using government policy documents related to multicultural education in Singapore and South Korea, the collected data was analyzed using critical discourse analysis (CDA) and interpreted with the theory of five approaches to multicultural education by Sleeter and Grant (1999). The five approaches include 1) Teaching the Exceptional and Culturally Different, 2) Human Relations, 3) Single-Group Studies, 4) Multicultural Education, and 5) Education that is Multicultural and Social Reconstructionist. The findings illuminate the two nations’ distinct national stances and trajectories in the realm of multicultural education while concurrently identifying a shared commitment to the Multicultural Education approach within the policy documents of both. In Singapore, a combination of Human Relations, Single-Group Studies, and Multicultural Education is deeply embedded throughout the nation’s policy discourses. Conversely, South Korea’s attempts at multicultural education present an evolving narrative, shifting from a conservative perspective rooted in Teaching the Exceptional and Culturally Different to a more liberal stance deeply grounded in the tenets of the Multicultural Education approach. This study emphasizes the importance of sociocultural and sociopolitical context in shaping a government’s approach to multicultural education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"rEFLections\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"rEFLections\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v30i3.268950\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"rEFLections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v30i3.268950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了新加坡和韩国的多元文化教育政策,分析了它们在各自独特的社会政治和社会文化背景下所采取的方法。本研究还讨论了两国政策中使用的方法对多元文化教学能力的影响。利用新加坡和韩国与多元文化教育相关的政府政策文件,采用批判性话语分析(CDA)对收集到的数据进行分析,并根据 Sleeter 和 Grant(1999 年)提出的多元文化教育五种方法理论进行解释。这五种方法包括:1)特殊和文化差异教学;2)人际关系;3)单一群体研究;4)多元文化教育;5)多元文化和社会重建主义教育。研究结果阐明了两国在多元文化教育领域的不同国家立场和发展轨迹,同时也确定了两国政策文件中对多元文化教育方法的共同承诺。在新加坡,"人际关系"、"单一群体研究 "和 "多元文化教育 "三者的结合深深植根于国家的政策论述之中。相反,韩国在多元文化教育方面的尝试则呈现出一种不断发展的态势,从根植于 "特殊教育 "和 "文化差异教育 "的保守视角转变为以 "多元文化教育 "方法的信条为基础的更为自由的立场。本研究强调了社会文化和社会政治背景在塑造政府多元文化教育方法方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Study of Multicultural Education and Teachers’ Multicultural Teaching Competency in Singapore and South Korea
This study examines multicultural education policies in Singapore and South Korea, analyzing their approaches within their unique sociopolitical and sociocultural contexts. This study also discusses the implications of the approaches used in both nations’ policies on multicultural teaching competence. Using government policy documents related to multicultural education in Singapore and South Korea, the collected data was analyzed using critical discourse analysis (CDA) and interpreted with the theory of five approaches to multicultural education by Sleeter and Grant (1999). The five approaches include 1) Teaching the Exceptional and Culturally Different, 2) Human Relations, 3) Single-Group Studies, 4) Multicultural Education, and 5) Education that is Multicultural and Social Reconstructionist. The findings illuminate the two nations’ distinct national stances and trajectories in the realm of multicultural education while concurrently identifying a shared commitment to the Multicultural Education approach within the policy documents of both. In Singapore, a combination of Human Relations, Single-Group Studies, and Multicultural Education is deeply embedded throughout the nation’s policy discourses. Conversely, South Korea’s attempts at multicultural education present an evolving narrative, shifting from a conservative perspective rooted in Teaching the Exceptional and Culturally Different to a more liberal stance deeply grounded in the tenets of the Multicultural Education approach. This study emphasizes the importance of sociocultural and sociopolitical context in shaping a government’s approach to multicultural education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
rEFLections
rEFLections Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Verb Error Analysis of Thai EFL Generation Z and Generation Alpha Students in Thailand English-Medium Instruction in Higher Education A Bibliometric Analysis of Keywords of HyFlex Learning for the English Language Learning Skills of Teacher Students Vlogging: An Alternative to Role-play in Improving EFL Learners' Conversation Skills English for Business Communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1