{"title":"基于概率思维水平的概率学习障碍","authors":"Atika Defita Sari, Didi Suryadi, D. Dasari","doi":"10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp207-226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine students learning obstacles in probability material based on their probabilistic thinking (PT) level using the theory of didactical situation (TDS) perspective. This is qualitative research with the case study method. The subject consisted of 23 grade 9 students in junior high school who had studied the material and had taken the test. The test results were used to classify students depending on their PT level using the framework developed by Graha A. Jones. Furthermore, interviews were performed with three representative students from each PT level. The interviews indicated that students in each PT level continue to face learning obstacles, which include instrumental ontogenic and epistemological obstacles. The lowest PT level demonstrated a more complex and comprehensive learning obstacle in all constructs of PT. From the TDS perspective, all students who are at various levels of PT have reached an action situation. Only 33% of the students at the subjective level and 83% of the students at the transition level reached the formulation situation. Still, students at that level needed help to reach the other two situations. Unlike the two previous levels, students at the level of quantitative informal thinking can achieve situations of validation and institutionalization.","PeriodicalId":37090,"journal":{"name":"Journal on Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning obstacle of probability learning based on the probabilistic thinking level\",\"authors\":\"Atika Defita Sari, Didi Suryadi, D. Dasari\",\"doi\":\"10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp207-226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine students learning obstacles in probability material based on their probabilistic thinking (PT) level using the theory of didactical situation (TDS) perspective. This is qualitative research with the case study method. The subject consisted of 23 grade 9 students in junior high school who had studied the material and had taken the test. The test results were used to classify students depending on their PT level using the framework developed by Graha A. Jones. Furthermore, interviews were performed with three representative students from each PT level. The interviews indicated that students in each PT level continue to face learning obstacles, which include instrumental ontogenic and epistemological obstacles. The lowest PT level demonstrated a more complex and comprehensive learning obstacle in all constructs of PT. From the TDS perspective, all students who are at various levels of PT have reached an action situation. Only 33% of the students at the subjective level and 83% of the students at the transition level reached the formulation situation. Still, students at that level needed help to reach the other two situations. Unlike the two previous levels, students at the level of quantitative informal thinking can achieve situations of validation and institutionalization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal on Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal on Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp207-226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp207-226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在从教学情境理论(TDS)的角度,根据学生的概率思维(PT)水平,确定学生在概率教材中的学习障碍。本研究采用个案研究法进行定性研究。研究对象包括 23 名初中九年级学生,他们学习了教材并参加了测试。根据测试结果,采用 Graha A. Jones 开发的框架对学生的能力倾向水平进行了分类。此外,还对每个教学能力水平中的三名有代表性的学生进行了访谈。访谈结果表明,每个学习策略水平的学生仍然面临学习障碍,其中包括工具性本体障碍和认识论障碍。最低 PT 水平的学生在 PT 的所有建构方面都表现出更复杂和更全面的学习障碍。从 TDS 的角度看,所有处于不同水平的学生都达到了行动状态。只有 33%的主观水平学生和 83%的过渡水平学生达到了表述情境。尽管如此,该层次的学生仍需要帮助才能达到其他两种情境。与前两个层次不同,定量非正式思维层次的学生可以达到验证和制度化的情境。
Learning obstacle of probability learning based on the probabilistic thinking level
This study aims to determine students learning obstacles in probability material based on their probabilistic thinking (PT) level using the theory of didactical situation (TDS) perspective. This is qualitative research with the case study method. The subject consisted of 23 grade 9 students in junior high school who had studied the material and had taken the test. The test results were used to classify students depending on their PT level using the framework developed by Graha A. Jones. Furthermore, interviews were performed with three representative students from each PT level. The interviews indicated that students in each PT level continue to face learning obstacles, which include instrumental ontogenic and epistemological obstacles. The lowest PT level demonstrated a more complex and comprehensive learning obstacle in all constructs of PT. From the TDS perspective, all students who are at various levels of PT have reached an action situation. Only 33% of the students at the subjective level and 83% of the students at the transition level reached the formulation situation. Still, students at that level needed help to reach the other two situations. Unlike the two previous levels, students at the level of quantitative informal thinking can achieve situations of validation and institutionalization.