连带效应:美国经济和全球股市是否容易受到第一共和银行倒闭的影响?

IF 0.4 Q4 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.21833/ijaas.2023.11.008
Abdullah Bin Omar, H. Akeel, H. Khoj
{"title":"连带效应:美国经济和全球股市是否容易受到第一共和银行倒闭的影响?","authors":"Abdullah Bin Omar, H. Akeel, H. Khoj","doi":"10.21833/ijaas.2023.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, First Republic Bank collapsed and is considered the second-largest bank failure in U.S. history. These bank runs can have a cascading or contagion effect on other large banks, and U.S. banking crises can flare up again. We examine the effect of the First Republic bank run on top U.S. banks, U.S. stock indices, and global stock indices using standard event study methodology. We report abnormal returns and cumulative abnormal returns for the event day (t = May 01, 2023) and the 10-day event window (t-5 to t+5), respectively, using data from the 120-day estimation window. The results indicate that on the event day, only JP Morgan Bank's returns were negative, while other banks acted as safe havens for investors. No significant change in returns on the event day is observed for U.S. sector indices (except for the healthcare sector) and global stock exchanges, except for the European and Chinese markets. During the event window, the occurrence of the event significantly affects bank returns after the event date, but no significant effect is found before the event date. Similarly, the healthcare and transportation sectors are more affected than other sectors, while the U.S. and Canadian stock markets seem to be more susceptible to the bank run. Overall, the results suggest that the U.S. government should take decisive initiatives to stop the ripple effect and protect the entire financial system.","PeriodicalId":46663,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cascade effect: Are the U.S. economy and global stock markets vulnerable to the collapse of First Republic Bank?\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Bin Omar, H. Akeel, H. Khoj\",\"doi\":\"10.21833/ijaas.2023.11.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, First Republic Bank collapsed and is considered the second-largest bank failure in U.S. history. These bank runs can have a cascading or contagion effect on other large banks, and U.S. banking crises can flare up again. We examine the effect of the First Republic bank run on top U.S. banks, U.S. stock indices, and global stock indices using standard event study methodology. We report abnormal returns and cumulative abnormal returns for the event day (t = May 01, 2023) and the 10-day event window (t-5 to t+5), respectively, using data from the 120-day estimation window. The results indicate that on the event day, only JP Morgan Bank's returns were negative, while other banks acted as safe havens for investors. No significant change in returns on the event day is observed for U.S. sector indices (except for the healthcare sector) and global stock exchanges, except for the European and Chinese markets. During the event window, the occurrence of the event significantly affects bank returns after the event date, but no significant effect is found before the event date. Similarly, the healthcare and transportation sectors are more affected than other sectors, while the U.S. and Canadian stock markets seem to be more susceptible to the bank run. Overall, the results suggest that the U.S. government should take decisive initiatives to stop the ripple effect and protect the entire financial system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.11.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.11.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

继硅谷银行和 Signature 银行倒闭之后,第一共和银行也倒闭了,被认为是美国历史上第二大倒闭银行。这些银行挤兑会对其他大型银行产生连带或传染效应,美国银行业危机可能再次爆发。我们采用标准的事件研究方法,研究了第一共和国银行挤兑对美国顶级银行、美国股票指数和全球股票指数的影响。我们使用 120 天估计窗口的数据,分别报告了事件日(t = 2023 年 5 月 1 日)和 10 天事件窗口(t-5 至 t+5)的异常回报和累计异常回报。结果表明,在事件发生日,只有摩根大通银行的收益率为负,而其他银行则成为投资者的避风港。在事件日,美国行业指数(医疗保健行业除外)和全球证券交易所(欧洲和中国市场除外)的收益率均无明显变化。在事件窗口期,事件的发生对事件发生日之后的银行回报率有显著影响,但对事件发生日之前的回报率没有显著影响。同样,与其他行业相比,医疗保健和运输行业受到的影响更大,而美国和加拿大股市似乎更容易受到银行挤兑的影响。总之,研究结果表明,美国政府应采取果断措施阻止连锁反应,保护整个金融体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The cascade effect: Are the U.S. economy and global stock markets vulnerable to the collapse of First Republic Bank?
Following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, First Republic Bank collapsed and is considered the second-largest bank failure in U.S. history. These bank runs can have a cascading or contagion effect on other large banks, and U.S. banking crises can flare up again. We examine the effect of the First Republic bank run on top U.S. banks, U.S. stock indices, and global stock indices using standard event study methodology. We report abnormal returns and cumulative abnormal returns for the event day (t = May 01, 2023) and the 10-day event window (t-5 to t+5), respectively, using data from the 120-day estimation window. The results indicate that on the event day, only JP Morgan Bank's returns were negative, while other banks acted as safe havens for investors. No significant change in returns on the event day is observed for U.S. sector indices (except for the healthcare sector) and global stock exchanges, except for the European and Chinese markets. During the event window, the occurrence of the event significantly affects bank returns after the event date, but no significant effect is found before the event date. Similarly, the healthcare and transportation sectors are more affected than other sectors, while the U.S. and Canadian stock markets seem to be more susceptible to the bank run. Overall, the results suggest that the U.S. government should take decisive initiatives to stop the ripple effect and protect the entire financial system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
234
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the views of nurses and supervisors on leadership competencies for enhanced primary healthcare services Morphophonemic parser: A study of teachers and students Nurturing brilliance: A cross-cultural exploration of supporting gifted children The cascade effect: Are the U.S. economy and global stock markets vulnerable to the collapse of First Republic Bank? Evolution and future perspectives of scientific journals in Peruvian public universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1