乌克兰受保护地区的状况:全面入侵造成的损失的中期最新情况

Q1 Environmental Science Parks Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.2305/wuer4443
Hannah Timmins, Olesya Petrovych, Anastasiia Drapaliuk, Kateryna Polianska, Oleksii Vasyliuk, Jody Bragger, Anna Kuzemko, Denis Vishnevsky
{"title":"乌克兰受保护地区的状况:全面入侵造成的损失的中期最新情况","authors":"Hannah Timmins, Olesya Petrovych, Anastasiia Drapaliuk, Kateryna Polianska, Oleksii Vasyliuk, Jody Bragger, Anna Kuzemko, Denis Vishnevsky","doi":"10.2305/wuer4443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Russian Federation’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has become a humanitarian and political crisis. Since the very start of the invasion, it has also been an ecological disaster, with Russian troops utilising protected areas both in an attempt to access strategic Ukrainian settlements, but also as locations in which to conduct active warfare. The frontline has now crossed and retreated from many protected areas, many are still occupied and many are still the sites of active hostilities. This study found the most common damages to protected areas are: physical destruction of habitats and wildlife and wildlife behavioural changes from explosions; chemical and physical pollution from explosive materials; fires caused by shelling; damages to soil and plant cover from heavy military vehicles, equipment and defence infrastructure; and military exploitation of natural resources. Given the occupation, combat and mining with explosives, it will be years before Ukraine can account for the full extent of damage to its protected area system. This paper provides an interim assessment of the damages to protected areas so far and urges the conservation and policy communities to monitor the situation moving forward.","PeriodicalId":37571,"journal":{"name":"Parks","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The State of Ukraine's Protected Areas: an interim update on damages from the full-scale invasion\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Timmins, Olesya Petrovych, Anastasiia Drapaliuk, Kateryna Polianska, Oleksii Vasyliuk, Jody Bragger, Anna Kuzemko, Denis Vishnevsky\",\"doi\":\"10.2305/wuer4443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Russian Federation’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has become a humanitarian and political crisis. Since the very start of the invasion, it has also been an ecological disaster, with Russian troops utilising protected areas both in an attempt to access strategic Ukrainian settlements, but also as locations in which to conduct active warfare. The frontline has now crossed and retreated from many protected areas, many are still occupied and many are still the sites of active hostilities. This study found the most common damages to protected areas are: physical destruction of habitats and wildlife and wildlife behavioural changes from explosions; chemical and physical pollution from explosive materials; fires caused by shelling; damages to soil and plant cover from heavy military vehicles, equipment and defence infrastructure; and military exploitation of natural resources. Given the occupation, combat and mining with explosives, it will be years before Ukraine can account for the full extent of damage to its protected area system. This paper provides an interim assessment of the damages to protected areas so far and urges the conservation and policy communities to monitor the situation moving forward.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parks\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2305/wuer4443\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2305/wuer4443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

俄罗斯联邦对乌克兰的全面入侵已成为一场人道主义和政治危机。自入侵伊始,这也是一场生态灾难,俄罗斯军队不仅利用保护区试图进入乌克兰的战略定居点,而且还将其作为开展积极战争的地点。前线现已越过许多保护区并从那里撤退,但许多保护区仍被占领,许多保护区仍是正在发生敌对行动的地点。这项研究发现,对保护区最常见的破坏包括:爆炸对栖息地和野生动物造成的物理破坏以及野生动物行为的改变;爆炸材料造成的化学和物理污染;炮击引起的火灾;重型军用车辆、装备和国防基础设施对土壤和植物植被造成的破坏;以及对自然资源的军事开采。考虑到占领、战斗和使用爆炸物采矿,乌克兰需要数年时间才能对其保护区系统遭受的全部破坏程度做出说明。本文件对迄今为止保护区遭受的破坏进行了临时评估,并敦促保护和政策界对未来的形势进行监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The State of Ukraine's Protected Areas: an interim update on damages from the full-scale invasion
The Russian Federation’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has become a humanitarian and political crisis. Since the very start of the invasion, it has also been an ecological disaster, with Russian troops utilising protected areas both in an attempt to access strategic Ukrainian settlements, but also as locations in which to conduct active warfare. The frontline has now crossed and retreated from many protected areas, many are still occupied and many are still the sites of active hostilities. This study found the most common damages to protected areas are: physical destruction of habitats and wildlife and wildlife behavioural changes from explosions; chemical and physical pollution from explosive materials; fires caused by shelling; damages to soil and plant cover from heavy military vehicles, equipment and defence infrastructure; and military exploitation of natural resources. Given the occupation, combat and mining with explosives, it will be years before Ukraine can account for the full extent of damage to its protected area system. This paper provides an interim assessment of the damages to protected areas so far and urges the conservation and policy communities to monitor the situation moving forward.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Parks
Parks Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: We aim for PARKS to be a rigorous, challenging publication with high academic credibility and standing. But at the same time the journal is and should remain primarily a resource for people actively involved in establishing and managing protected areas, under any management category or governance type. We aim for the majority of papers accepted to include practical management information. We also work hard to include authors who are involved in management but do not usually find the time to report the results of their research and experience to a wider audience. We welcome submissions from people whose written English is imperfect as long as they have interesting research to report, backed up by firm evidence, and are happy to work with authors to develop papers for the journal. PARKS is published with the aim of strengthening international collaboration in protected area development and management by: • promoting understanding of the values and benefits derived from protected areas to governments, communities, visitors, business etc; • ensuring that protected areas fulfil their primary role in nature conservation while addressing critical issues such as ecologically sustainable development, social justice and climate change adaptation and mitigation; • serving as a leading global forum for the exchange of information on issues relating to protected areas, especially learning from case studies of applied ideas; • publishing articles reporting on recent applied research that is relevant to protected area management; • changing and improving protected area management, policy environment and socio-economic benefits through use of information provided in the journal; and • promoting IUCN’s work on protected areas.
期刊最新文献
Clarifying ‘long-term’ for protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs): why only 25 years of ‘intent’ does not qualify The World Heritage Convention, Protected Areas and Rivers: Challenges for Representation and Implications for International Water Cooperation A crisis of moral ecology: Magar agro-pastoralism in Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve, Nepal The benefits of the IUCN Green List in implementing effective park management in Queensland, Australia Nudging to glory: the World Heritage Convention’s influence in conflict-prone Global South natural sites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1