重症监护胸腔积液引流的疗效和安全性:ESODICE 随机对照试验研究方案

E. Fysh, Bhaumik V. Mevavala, Charlotte Wigston, Dana Hince, Isuru Sirisinghe, A. Regli, Edward Litton, Brad Wibrow
{"title":"重症监护胸腔积液引流的疗效和安全性:ESODICE 随机对照试验研究方案","authors":"E. Fysh, Bhaumik V. Mevavala, Charlotte Wigston, Dana Hince, Isuru Sirisinghe, A. Regli, Edward Litton, Brad Wibrow","doi":"10.1097/md9.0000000000000301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pleural effusions are common in intensive care patients. Without strong evidence to guide management, clinicians variably undertake either intervention with drainage procedures, or expectant management, that is, observation, whilst treating the underlying cause. Early drainage may be associated with improved diagnostic accuracy and oxygenation, without increased complications. However, randomized evidence is needed to confirm these observations. In patients diagnosed with a safely drainable pleural effusion while admitted to the intensive care units (ICU) and in whom there is no absolute indication for immediate drainage, intervention with early pleural drainage compared with initial expectant management: improves oxygenation and is safe. To undertake a phase II multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of early pleural effusion drainage compared with expectant management in the intensive care setting. Population – patients admitted in intensive care units and diagnosed with a safely drainable pleural effusion in whom there is no absolute indication for immediate drainage. Co-primary endpoints – ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio at 48 hours after randomization and number of Pleural Effusion Related Serious Adverse Events at 90 days. Inclusion criteria – admitted to intensive care, age > 18 years, pleural effusion safely drainable, and no absolute indication for immediate drainage. Exclusion criteria – in the opinion of treating clinician trial not in patient’s best interests, inability to gain consent from patient or responsible decision-maker, and patient requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Randomization – open-label, 1:1 patient ratio using permuted block randomization. Intervention and comparator – drainage of pleural effusion as opposed to expectant management. Outcomes – physiological data including ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen and/or ratio of oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio will be collected at randomization and 6 hourly until 72 hours or ICU discharge (whichever sooner). Adverse event and clinical data will be recorded daily to ICU discharge, hospital discharge and death up to 90 days after randomization.","PeriodicalId":325445,"journal":{"name":"Medicine: Case Reports and Study Protocols","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety outcomes of drainage of intensive care pleural effusions: Study protocol for the ESODICE randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"E. Fysh, Bhaumik V. Mevavala, Charlotte Wigston, Dana Hince, Isuru Sirisinghe, A. Regli, Edward Litton, Brad Wibrow\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/md9.0000000000000301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pleural effusions are common in intensive care patients. Without strong evidence to guide management, clinicians variably undertake either intervention with drainage procedures, or expectant management, that is, observation, whilst treating the underlying cause. Early drainage may be associated with improved diagnostic accuracy and oxygenation, without increased complications. However, randomized evidence is needed to confirm these observations. In patients diagnosed with a safely drainable pleural effusion while admitted to the intensive care units (ICU) and in whom there is no absolute indication for immediate drainage, intervention with early pleural drainage compared with initial expectant management: improves oxygenation and is safe. To undertake a phase II multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of early pleural effusion drainage compared with expectant management in the intensive care setting. Population – patients admitted in intensive care units and diagnosed with a safely drainable pleural effusion in whom there is no absolute indication for immediate drainage. Co-primary endpoints – ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio at 48 hours after randomization and number of Pleural Effusion Related Serious Adverse Events at 90 days. Inclusion criteria – admitted to intensive care, age > 18 years, pleural effusion safely drainable, and no absolute indication for immediate drainage. Exclusion criteria – in the opinion of treating clinician trial not in patient’s best interests, inability to gain consent from patient or responsible decision-maker, and patient requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Randomization – open-label, 1:1 patient ratio using permuted block randomization. Intervention and comparator – drainage of pleural effusion as opposed to expectant management. Outcomes – physiological data including ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen and/or ratio of oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio will be collected at randomization and 6 hourly until 72 hours or ICU discharge (whichever sooner). Adverse event and clinical data will be recorded daily to ICU discharge, hospital discharge and death up to 90 days after randomization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine: Case Reports and Study Protocols\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine: Case Reports and Study Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/md9.0000000000000301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine: Case Reports and Study Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/md9.0000000000000301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胸腔积液是重症监护患者的常见病。由于缺乏有力的证据来指导处理方法,临床医生要么采取引流术进行干预,要么进行预期处理,即在治疗潜在病因的同时进行观察。早期引流可能会提高诊断准确性和氧合,但不会增加并发症。不过,还需要随机证据来证实这些观察结果。 对于在重症监护病房(ICU)住院期间诊断出胸腔积液可安全引流,且没有立即引流的绝对指征的患者,与最初的预期治疗相比,早期胸腔积液引流术可改善氧合,且安全。 开展一项 II 期多中心随机对照试验,评估在重症监护环境中早期胸腔积液引流与期待疗法相比的安全性和有效性。 研究对象 - 入住重症监护病房并被诊断为胸腔积液可安全引流且无绝对指征立即引流的患者。共同主要终点--随机分配后 48 小时内动脉血氧分压与吸入氧分压的比率,以及 90 天内胸腔积液相关严重不良事件的数量。纳入标准 - 入住重症监护室、年龄大于 18 岁、胸腔积液可安全引流、无立即引流的绝对指征。排除标准--主治临床医生认为试验不符合患者的最佳利益、无法获得患者或负责决策者的同意、患者需要体外膜氧合。随机化--开放标签、1:1 的患者比例,采用排列组合随机化。干预措施和参照物--胸腔积液引流,而非期待疗法。结果--将在随机化时收集生理数据,包括动脉血氧分压与吸入氧分压的比率和/或脉搏血氧仪测量的血氧饱和度与吸入氧分压的比率,每6小时收集一次,直至72小时或ICU出院(以较早者为准)。将每天记录不良事件和临床数据,直至 ICU 出院、出院和随机化后 90 天内死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety outcomes of drainage of intensive care pleural effusions: Study protocol for the ESODICE randomized controlled trial
Pleural effusions are common in intensive care patients. Without strong evidence to guide management, clinicians variably undertake either intervention with drainage procedures, or expectant management, that is, observation, whilst treating the underlying cause. Early drainage may be associated with improved diagnostic accuracy and oxygenation, without increased complications. However, randomized evidence is needed to confirm these observations. In patients diagnosed with a safely drainable pleural effusion while admitted to the intensive care units (ICU) and in whom there is no absolute indication for immediate drainage, intervention with early pleural drainage compared with initial expectant management: improves oxygenation and is safe. To undertake a phase II multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of early pleural effusion drainage compared with expectant management in the intensive care setting. Population – patients admitted in intensive care units and diagnosed with a safely drainable pleural effusion in whom there is no absolute indication for immediate drainage. Co-primary endpoints – ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio at 48 hours after randomization and number of Pleural Effusion Related Serious Adverse Events at 90 days. Inclusion criteria – admitted to intensive care, age > 18 years, pleural effusion safely drainable, and no absolute indication for immediate drainage. Exclusion criteria – in the opinion of treating clinician trial not in patient’s best interests, inability to gain consent from patient or responsible decision-maker, and patient requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Randomization – open-label, 1:1 patient ratio using permuted block randomization. Intervention and comparator – drainage of pleural effusion as opposed to expectant management. Outcomes – physiological data including ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen and/or ratio of oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio will be collected at randomization and 6 hourly until 72 hours or ICU discharge (whichever sooner). Adverse event and clinical data will be recorded daily to ICU discharge, hospital discharge and death up to 90 days after randomization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rapid alleviation of perioperative airway obstruction through positional adjustments in a patient with a giant anterior mediastinal mass: A case report Effectiveness of Zhuang medicine medicated thread moxibustion on human xanthelasma – a case series Just the tip of the iceberg: Extensive flexor tenosynovitis due to Candida parapsilosis, a case report Cefuroxime induced agranulocytosis during heart transplant period: A case report Successful second kidney transplantation following cured metastatic rectal cancer after first kidney transplantation, 20-year history: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1