400 与 200 毫克/千克/天葡萄糖酸钙预防新生儿低钙血症的疗效对比

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS Paediatrica Indonesiana Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.14238/pi63.5.2023.346-52
Liza Apsera, P. Sianturi, S. Nafianti
{"title":"400 与 200 毫克/千克/天葡萄糖酸钙预防新生儿低钙血症的疗效对比","authors":"Liza Apsera, P. Sianturi, S. Nafianti","doi":"10.14238/pi63.5.2023.346-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Serum calcium is at its lowest level within 24–48 hours after birth, rendering the neonate vulnerable to hypocalcemia. In our center, despite prophylactic administration of 200 mg/kg/day calcium gluconate, the prevalence of neonatal hypocalcemia remains high. Aim To determine the prophylactic efficacy of 400 vs. 200 mg/kg/day calcium gluconate in preventing neonatal hypocalcemia. Methods A randomized clinical trial with a pre- and post-test experimental design was done on neonates who fasted or received only minimal enteral feeding. Subjects were randomized to receive either 400 mg/kg/day (intervention group) or 200 mg/kg/day (control group) of intravenous calcium gluconate. We compared serum ionized calcium levels on the first day of admission before calcium gluconate administration and on the third day of hospitalization between the intervention and control groups. Results The median ionized calcium levels in the intervention vs. control group before calcium gluconate administration was 1.16 (range 0.4-2.4) mmol/L vs. 1.15 (range 0.6-4.5) mmol/L , respectively (P=0.561). After three days of calcium gluconate administration, the median ionized calcium level was 1.19 (range 0.7-1.45) mmol/L vs. 1.19 (range 0.68-4.6) mmol/L in the intervention vs. control group, respectively (P=0.828). The difference in pre- vs. post-administration ionized calcium levels was significant within the intervention group (P=0.032), but not within the control group (P=0.128). Conclusion Prophylactic intravenous calcium gluconate at 400 mg/kg/day was not more effective in preventing neonatal hypocalcemia than 200 mg/kg/day.","PeriodicalId":19660,"journal":{"name":"Paediatrica Indonesiana","volume":"818 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prophylactic efficacy of 400 vs. 200 mg/kg /day calcium gluconate to prevent neonatal hypocalcemia\",\"authors\":\"Liza Apsera, P. Sianturi, S. Nafianti\",\"doi\":\"10.14238/pi63.5.2023.346-52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Serum calcium is at its lowest level within 24–48 hours after birth, rendering the neonate vulnerable to hypocalcemia. In our center, despite prophylactic administration of 200 mg/kg/day calcium gluconate, the prevalence of neonatal hypocalcemia remains high. Aim To determine the prophylactic efficacy of 400 vs. 200 mg/kg/day calcium gluconate in preventing neonatal hypocalcemia. Methods A randomized clinical trial with a pre- and post-test experimental design was done on neonates who fasted or received only minimal enteral feeding. Subjects were randomized to receive either 400 mg/kg/day (intervention group) or 200 mg/kg/day (control group) of intravenous calcium gluconate. We compared serum ionized calcium levels on the first day of admission before calcium gluconate administration and on the third day of hospitalization between the intervention and control groups. Results The median ionized calcium levels in the intervention vs. control group before calcium gluconate administration was 1.16 (range 0.4-2.4) mmol/L vs. 1.15 (range 0.6-4.5) mmol/L , respectively (P=0.561). After three days of calcium gluconate administration, the median ionized calcium level was 1.19 (range 0.7-1.45) mmol/L vs. 1.19 (range 0.68-4.6) mmol/L in the intervention vs. control group, respectively (P=0.828). The difference in pre- vs. post-administration ionized calcium levels was significant within the intervention group (P=0.032), but not within the control group (P=0.128). Conclusion Prophylactic intravenous calcium gluconate at 400 mg/kg/day was not more effective in preventing neonatal hypocalcemia than 200 mg/kg/day.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paediatrica Indonesiana\",\"volume\":\"818 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paediatrica Indonesiana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14238/pi63.5.2023.346-52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatrica Indonesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14238/pi63.5.2023.346-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 新生儿出生后 24-48 小时内血清钙处于最低水平,容易发生低钙血症。在我们中心,尽管每天预防性服用 200 毫克/千克葡萄糖酸钙,但新生儿低钙血症的发病率仍然很高。 目的 确定 400 毫克/公斤/天葡萄糖酸钙与 200 毫克/公斤/天葡萄糖酸钙在预防新生儿低钙血症方面的预防性疗效。 方法 对禁食或仅接受少量肠内喂养的新生儿进行了一项随机临床试验,试验设计分为试验前和试验后两个阶段。受试者被随机分配到静脉注射葡萄糖酸钙400毫克/千克/天(干预组)或200毫克/千克/天(对照组)。我们比较了干预组和对照组患者入院第一天和住院第三天服用葡萄糖酸钙前的血清离子钙水平。 结果 在服用葡萄糖酸钙前,干预组与对照组的离子钙水平中位数分别为 1.16(范围 0.4-2.4)mmol/L 与 1.15(范围 0.6-4.5)mmol/L(P=0.561)。服用葡萄糖酸钙三天后,干预组与对照组的离子钙水平中位数分别为 1.19(范围 0.7-1.45)毫摩尔/升与 1.19(范围 0.68-4.6)毫摩尔/升(P=0.828)。干预组用药前与用药后的离子钙水平差异显著(P=0.032),而对照组差异不显著(P=0.128)。 结论 预防性静脉注射葡萄糖酸钙 400 毫克/千克/天并不比 200 毫克/千克/天更有效地预防新生儿低钙血症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prophylactic efficacy of 400 vs. 200 mg/kg /day calcium gluconate to prevent neonatal hypocalcemia
Background Serum calcium is at its lowest level within 24–48 hours after birth, rendering the neonate vulnerable to hypocalcemia. In our center, despite prophylactic administration of 200 mg/kg/day calcium gluconate, the prevalence of neonatal hypocalcemia remains high. Aim To determine the prophylactic efficacy of 400 vs. 200 mg/kg/day calcium gluconate in preventing neonatal hypocalcemia. Methods A randomized clinical trial with a pre- and post-test experimental design was done on neonates who fasted or received only minimal enteral feeding. Subjects were randomized to receive either 400 mg/kg/day (intervention group) or 200 mg/kg/day (control group) of intravenous calcium gluconate. We compared serum ionized calcium levels on the first day of admission before calcium gluconate administration and on the third day of hospitalization between the intervention and control groups. Results The median ionized calcium levels in the intervention vs. control group before calcium gluconate administration was 1.16 (range 0.4-2.4) mmol/L vs. 1.15 (range 0.6-4.5) mmol/L , respectively (P=0.561). After three days of calcium gluconate administration, the median ionized calcium level was 1.19 (range 0.7-1.45) mmol/L vs. 1.19 (range 0.68-4.6) mmol/L in the intervention vs. control group, respectively (P=0.828). The difference in pre- vs. post-administration ionized calcium levels was significant within the intervention group (P=0.032), but not within the control group (P=0.128). Conclusion Prophylactic intravenous calcium gluconate at 400 mg/kg/day was not more effective in preventing neonatal hypocalcemia than 200 mg/kg/day.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Quality of life of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia Fetus in fetu - the included twin/entrapped twin: a case report Optic nerve sheath diameter and severity of central nervous infection Quality of life in children with chronic kidney disease Preoperative hypoalbuminemia and severe acute malnutrition as prognostic factors for postoperative complications in major abdominal surgery: A single-center retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1