从战争罪到危害人类罪和种族灭绝罪:第一次世界大战后土耳其的责任

Q3 Social Sciences Genocide Studies International Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.3138/gsi-2022-0020
E. Gzoyan
{"title":"从战争罪到危害人类罪和种族灭绝罪:第一次世界大战后土耳其的责任","authors":"E. Gzoyan","doi":"10.3138/gsi-2022-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:On 24 May 1915, the Triple Entente powers of Britain, France, and Russia issued a joint declaration that qualified the massacres, imprisonments and violence inflicted on the peaceful Armenian population as \"crimes against humanity and civilization.\" The concept of crimes against humanity was further developed and explained by the Commission on the Responsibility of the Authors of the War and on Enforcement of Penalties (hereinafter: Commission), which was formed during the Paris Peace Conference to investigate violations of the laws and customs of war and prosecute war criminals. This article traces the evolution of discussions held within the Commission regarding the atrocities committed by the Ottoman Turkish government against its Armenian population, which technically fell outside the jurisdiction of the crimes specified in these talks, as the atrocities were committed not against the population of a belligerent state but, rather, against their own nationals. These discussions played a major part in the development of international criminal law; particularly of the concept of crimes against humanity. The Armenian Memorandum and the list of perpetrators of the Armenian atrocities were also presented to the Commission, which (together with other data and information collected) identified the crimes committed against the Armenian population by the Ottoman authorities, thus defining the concept of crimes against humanity and the acts that fell within its scope. Although post-World War I efforts for justice are generally assessed as a failed effort, crimes against humanity first materialized as a term in international law during this period and its development was based on the Armenian atrocities, which provided a critical basis for the International Military Tribunal's later convictions and contributed to the concept's evolution into its present-day significance.","PeriodicalId":40844,"journal":{"name":"Genocide Studies International","volume":"24 1","pages":"79 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From War Crimes to Crimes against Humanity and Genocide: Turkish Responsibility after World War I\",\"authors\":\"E. Gzoyan\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/gsi-2022-0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:On 24 May 1915, the Triple Entente powers of Britain, France, and Russia issued a joint declaration that qualified the massacres, imprisonments and violence inflicted on the peaceful Armenian population as \\\"crimes against humanity and civilization.\\\" The concept of crimes against humanity was further developed and explained by the Commission on the Responsibility of the Authors of the War and on Enforcement of Penalties (hereinafter: Commission), which was formed during the Paris Peace Conference to investigate violations of the laws and customs of war and prosecute war criminals. This article traces the evolution of discussions held within the Commission regarding the atrocities committed by the Ottoman Turkish government against its Armenian population, which technically fell outside the jurisdiction of the crimes specified in these talks, as the atrocities were committed not against the population of a belligerent state but, rather, against their own nationals. These discussions played a major part in the development of international criminal law; particularly of the concept of crimes against humanity. The Armenian Memorandum and the list of perpetrators of the Armenian atrocities were also presented to the Commission, which (together with other data and information collected) identified the crimes committed against the Armenian population by the Ottoman authorities, thus defining the concept of crimes against humanity and the acts that fell within its scope. Although post-World War I efforts for justice are generally assessed as a failed effort, crimes against humanity first materialized as a term in international law during this period and its development was based on the Armenian atrocities, which provided a critical basis for the International Military Tribunal's later convictions and contributed to the concept's evolution into its present-day significance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genocide Studies International\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"79 - 98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genocide Studies International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/gsi-2022-0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genocide Studies International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/gsi-2022-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:1915 年 5 月 24 日,英、法、俄三国协约国发表联合声明,将屠杀、囚禁和平的亚美尼 亚人并对其施以暴力的行为定性为 "反人类罪和反文明罪"。巴黎和会期间成立的战争发动者责任与刑罚执行委员会(以下简称:委员会)进一步发展和解释了反人类罪的概念,该委员会的任务是调查违反战争法规和惯例的行为并起诉战争罪犯。这篇文章追溯了委员会内部就奥斯曼土耳其政府对其亚美尼亚人口所犯暴行进行讨论的演变过程,从技术上讲,这些暴行不属于这些会谈中规定的罪行的管辖范围,因为这些暴行不是针对交战国的人口,而是针对其本国国民。这些讨论对国际刑法的发展,特别是危害人类罪概念的发展起到了重要作用。亚美尼亚备忘录》和亚美尼亚暴行犯罪人名单也提交给了委员会,委员会(连同收集到的其他数据和信息)确定了奥斯曼当局对亚美尼亚人民犯下的罪行,从而界定了危害人类罪的概念及其范围内的行为。虽然人们普遍认为第一次世界大战后的司法努力是失败的,但危害人类罪在这一时期首次成为国际法中的一个术语,其发展是以亚美尼亚暴行为基础的,这为国际军事法庭后来的定罪提供了重要依据,并促进了这一概念的演变,使其具有今天的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From War Crimes to Crimes against Humanity and Genocide: Turkish Responsibility after World War I
Abstract:On 24 May 1915, the Triple Entente powers of Britain, France, and Russia issued a joint declaration that qualified the massacres, imprisonments and violence inflicted on the peaceful Armenian population as "crimes against humanity and civilization." The concept of crimes against humanity was further developed and explained by the Commission on the Responsibility of the Authors of the War and on Enforcement of Penalties (hereinafter: Commission), which was formed during the Paris Peace Conference to investigate violations of the laws and customs of war and prosecute war criminals. This article traces the evolution of discussions held within the Commission regarding the atrocities committed by the Ottoman Turkish government against its Armenian population, which technically fell outside the jurisdiction of the crimes specified in these talks, as the atrocities were committed not against the population of a belligerent state but, rather, against their own nationals. These discussions played a major part in the development of international criminal law; particularly of the concept of crimes against humanity. The Armenian Memorandum and the list of perpetrators of the Armenian atrocities were also presented to the Commission, which (together with other data and information collected) identified the crimes committed against the Armenian population by the Ottoman authorities, thus defining the concept of crimes against humanity and the acts that fell within its scope. Although post-World War I efforts for justice are generally assessed as a failed effort, crimes against humanity first materialized as a term in international law during this period and its development was based on the Armenian atrocities, which provided a critical basis for the International Military Tribunal's later convictions and contributed to the concept's evolution into its present-day significance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genocide Studies International
Genocide Studies International POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Armenian Genocide Studies: Development as a Field, Historiographic Appraisal, and the Road Ahead Penal Battalions and Genocidal Warfare: History's Warnings, Wagner's Global Footprint, and Ukraine What Obligation Does the Global Community Have to Prevent Genocide, and What Form(s) Should these Prevention Efforts Take? Quality Genocide Education in American Schools: An Armenian Lens for Hope From War Crimes to Crimes against Humanity and Genocide: Turkish Responsibility after World War I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1