对破坏或浪费银行财产行为的刑事定罪:在必要与过度入罪之间

Ludmila Negritu
{"title":"对破坏或浪费银行财产行为的刑事定罪:在必要与过度入罪之间","authors":"Ludmila Negritu","doi":"10.52277/1857-2405.2023.3(66).03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this scientific research, we are interested in the analysis of the criminal norms whose regulatory object is the acts of intentional destruction or waste of the bank’s property by the bank’s administrator, in the administration process, approach carried out through the chain of systematic, critical and comparative interpretation of the relevant provisions. The purpose of the action undertaken is to reveal the need to criminalize the named offenses as a result of the finding of a parallel framework for their criminalization, consequently revealing an excess of criminal regulation due to the “ambiguities” that characterize the incriminating precept, recorded in paragraph (3) art. 197 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova, located in Chapter VI of the Special Part of the Criminal Code, entitled “Offenses against patrimony”.","PeriodicalId":254422,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criminalization of destroying or wasting bank property: between necessity and excess of incrimination\",\"authors\":\"Ludmila Negritu\",\"doi\":\"10.52277/1857-2405.2023.3(66).03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this scientific research, we are interested in the analysis of the criminal norms whose regulatory object is the acts of intentional destruction or waste of the bank’s property by the bank’s administrator, in the administration process, approach carried out through the chain of systematic, critical and comparative interpretation of the relevant provisions. The purpose of the action undertaken is to reveal the need to criminalize the named offenses as a result of the finding of a parallel framework for their criminalization, consequently revealing an excess of criminal regulation due to the “ambiguities” that characterize the incriminating precept, recorded in paragraph (3) art. 197 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova, located in Chapter VI of the Special Part of the Criminal Code, entitled “Offenses against patrimony”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2023.3(66).03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2023.3(66).03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项科学研究中,我们感兴趣的是通过对相关规定进行系统、批判性和比较性解释,分析以银行管理者在管理过程中故意破坏或浪费银行财产的行为为监管对象的刑事规范。所采取的行动的目的是揭示是否有必要将所列举的罪行定为刑事犯罪,因为发现了将这些罪行定为刑事犯罪的并行框架,从而揭示了由于《刑法典》第 197 条第(3)款所记录的定罪戒律的 "模糊性 "而导致的刑事监管过度。摩尔多瓦共和国刑法典》特别部分第六章 "侵犯财产罪 "中的第 197 条第(3)款规定了 "模棱两可 "的定罪戒律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Criminalization of destroying or wasting bank property: between necessity and excess of incrimination
In this scientific research, we are interested in the analysis of the criminal norms whose regulatory object is the acts of intentional destruction or waste of the bank’s property by the bank’s administrator, in the administration process, approach carried out through the chain of systematic, critical and comparative interpretation of the relevant provisions. The purpose of the action undertaken is to reveal the need to criminalize the named offenses as a result of the finding of a parallel framework for their criminalization, consequently revealing an excess of criminal regulation due to the “ambiguities” that characterize the incriminating precept, recorded in paragraph (3) art. 197 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova, located in Chapter VI of the Special Part of the Criminal Code, entitled “Offenses against patrimony”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of informational technologies in the education of drtainees: foreign experience and legal regulation Criminological specificity of war crimes, their difference from crimes against humanity and genocide Applicability of the ECHR case law within the judicial higher Court remedy examination Presumption of innocence in the doctrinal and regulatory sources of Western Europe (XIX-XX centuries) The presumption of lack of sexual consent in the case of a minor victim: a model of inspiration for the Moldovan legislator?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1