外国直接投资与定向技术进步偏差的演变:韩国对外投资的新证据

IF 0.4 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS Journal of Korea Trade Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.35611/jkt.2023.27.5.1
M. m
{"title":"外国直接投资与定向技术进步偏差的演变:韩国对外投资的新证据","authors":"M. m","doi":"10.35611/jkt.2023.27.5.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - Southeast Asia has been the focus of Korea's foreign investment. Korea has been helping developing countries in Southeast Asia achieve economic growth and win-win cooperation through capital exports. FDI is an important channel for technology diffusion. However, the impact of FDI on the bias of technological progress in the host country is dependent on the host country's own endowment structure and capital-labor factor substitution elasticity. Therefore, the central issue of this paper is to accurately evaluate the impact of Korea's FDI to the four Southeast Asian countries in various industries on their bias of technological progress. Design/methodology - The paper uses macroeconomic data for Korea and four East Asian countries to estimate capital-labor factor elasticities of substitution using nonlinear, seemingly uncorrelated regressions (NLSUR). Then, the biased technological change index (BTCI) is calculated for each country. Finally, panel data analysis is used to explore the impact of Korean FDI in various industries in the four Southeast Asian countries on their own directed technological progress, and a robustness test is conducted. Findings - There is a substitution relationship between capital and labor factors based on their elasticity in Korea, Singapore and the Philippines. There is a complementary relationship between capital and labor factors in Indonesia and Malaysia. According to the BTCI, there is a trend toward labor-biased technological progress in all countries. Korean investments in manufacturing, wholesale and retail trade in the host country trigger capital-biased technological change in the host country; investments in the finance, insurance and information and communication sectors trigger labor- biased technological change. In addition, this paper also confirms that directed technological progress can enable cross-country transmission. Originality/value - The innovation of this paper lies in three aspects. First, we estimate the BTCI for five countries and explore the trend and situation of directed technological progress in each country from each country's own perspective. Second, we explore the impact of Korean FDI in the host country on the bias to its technological progress at the industry level. Second, we explore the impact of Korean FDI in various industries in the four Southeast Asian countries on the four countries' own directed technological progress from a national perspective. Finally, we propose corresponding countermea- sures for technological progress from the perspective of inverse factor endowment. These innovative points not only expand the understanding of technological progress and cross-country technology transfer in East Asia but also provide practical references for policy-makers and business operators.","PeriodicalId":37797,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korea Trade","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FDI and the Evolution of Directed Technological Progress Bias: New Evidence from Korean Outward Investment\",\"authors\":\"M. m\",\"doi\":\"10.35611/jkt.2023.27.5.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose - Southeast Asia has been the focus of Korea's foreign investment. Korea has been helping developing countries in Southeast Asia achieve economic growth and win-win cooperation through capital exports. FDI is an important channel for technology diffusion. However, the impact of FDI on the bias of technological progress in the host country is dependent on the host country's own endowment structure and capital-labor factor substitution elasticity. Therefore, the central issue of this paper is to accurately evaluate the impact of Korea's FDI to the four Southeast Asian countries in various industries on their bias of technological progress. Design/methodology - The paper uses macroeconomic data for Korea and four East Asian countries to estimate capital-labor factor elasticities of substitution using nonlinear, seemingly uncorrelated regressions (NLSUR). Then, the biased technological change index (BTCI) is calculated for each country. Finally, panel data analysis is used to explore the impact of Korean FDI in various industries in the four Southeast Asian countries on their own directed technological progress, and a robustness test is conducted. Findings - There is a substitution relationship between capital and labor factors based on their elasticity in Korea, Singapore and the Philippines. There is a complementary relationship between capital and labor factors in Indonesia and Malaysia. According to the BTCI, there is a trend toward labor-biased technological progress in all countries. Korean investments in manufacturing, wholesale and retail trade in the host country trigger capital-biased technological change in the host country; investments in the finance, insurance and information and communication sectors trigger labor- biased technological change. In addition, this paper also confirms that directed technological progress can enable cross-country transmission. Originality/value - The innovation of this paper lies in three aspects. First, we estimate the BTCI for five countries and explore the trend and situation of directed technological progress in each country from each country's own perspective. Second, we explore the impact of Korean FDI in the host country on the bias to its technological progress at the industry level. Second, we explore the impact of Korean FDI in various industries in the four Southeast Asian countries on the four countries' own directed technological progress from a national perspective. Finally, we propose corresponding countermea- sures for technological progress from the perspective of inverse factor endowment. These innovative points not only expand the understanding of technological progress and cross-country technology transfer in East Asia but also provide practical references for policy-makers and business operators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korea Trade\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korea Trade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35611/jkt.2023.27.5.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korea Trade","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35611/jkt.2023.27.5.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的--东南亚一直是韩国对外投资的重点。韩国一直通过资本输出帮助东南亚发展中国家实现经济增长和合作共赢。外国直接投资是技术扩散的重要渠道。然而,外国直接投资对东道国技术进步偏差的影响取决于东道国自身的禀赋结构和资本-劳动要素替代弹性。因此,本文的核心问题是准确评估韩国对东南亚四国各行业的外国直接投资对其技术进步偏差的影响。 设计/方法 - 本文利用韩国和东亚四国的宏观经济数据,采用非线性、看似不相关的回归方法(NLSUR)估算资本-劳动要素替代弹性。然后,计算每个国家的偏向技术变化指数(BTCI)。最后,利用面板数据分析探讨韩国在东南亚四国各行业的外国直接投资对其自身定向技术进步的影响,并进行稳健性检验。 研究结果 - 在韩国、新加坡和菲律宾,资本要素和劳动要素之间存在基于弹性的替代关系。在印度尼西亚和马来西亚,资本和劳动要素之间存在互补关系。根据 BTCI,所有国家都存在偏重劳动力的技术进步趋势。韩国对东道国制造业、批发和零售业的投资引发了东道国资本偏向的技术变革;对金融、保险和信息通信部门的投资引发了劳动力偏向的技术变革。此外,本文还证实,定向技术进步可以实现跨国传播。 原创性/价值--本文的创新之处在于三个方面。首先,我们估算了五个国家的 BTCI,并从各国自身的角度探讨了各国定向技术进步的趋势和情况。其次,我们探讨了韩国在东道国的外国直接投资对其产业层面技术进步偏向的影响。其次,我们从国家角度探讨韩国在东南亚四国各行业的外国直接投资对四国自身技术进步导向的影响。最后,我们从反向要素禀赋的角度提出了相应的技术进步反证。这些创新观点不仅拓展了对东亚技术进步和跨国技术转移的理解,也为政策制定者和企业经营者提供了切实可行的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FDI and the Evolution of Directed Technological Progress Bias: New Evidence from Korean Outward Investment
Purpose - Southeast Asia has been the focus of Korea's foreign investment. Korea has been helping developing countries in Southeast Asia achieve economic growth and win-win cooperation through capital exports. FDI is an important channel for technology diffusion. However, the impact of FDI on the bias of technological progress in the host country is dependent on the host country's own endowment structure and capital-labor factor substitution elasticity. Therefore, the central issue of this paper is to accurately evaluate the impact of Korea's FDI to the four Southeast Asian countries in various industries on their bias of technological progress. Design/methodology - The paper uses macroeconomic data for Korea and four East Asian countries to estimate capital-labor factor elasticities of substitution using nonlinear, seemingly uncorrelated regressions (NLSUR). Then, the biased technological change index (BTCI) is calculated for each country. Finally, panel data analysis is used to explore the impact of Korean FDI in various industries in the four Southeast Asian countries on their own directed technological progress, and a robustness test is conducted. Findings - There is a substitution relationship between capital and labor factors based on their elasticity in Korea, Singapore and the Philippines. There is a complementary relationship between capital and labor factors in Indonesia and Malaysia. According to the BTCI, there is a trend toward labor-biased technological progress in all countries. Korean investments in manufacturing, wholesale and retail trade in the host country trigger capital-biased technological change in the host country; investments in the finance, insurance and information and communication sectors trigger labor- biased technological change. In addition, this paper also confirms that directed technological progress can enable cross-country transmission. Originality/value - The innovation of this paper lies in three aspects. First, we estimate the BTCI for five countries and explore the trend and situation of directed technological progress in each country from each country's own perspective. Second, we explore the impact of Korean FDI in the host country on the bias to its technological progress at the industry level. Second, we explore the impact of Korean FDI in various industries in the four Southeast Asian countries on the four countries' own directed technological progress from a national perspective. Finally, we propose corresponding countermea- sures for technological progress from the perspective of inverse factor endowment. These innovative points not only expand the understanding of technological progress and cross-country technology transfer in East Asia but also provide practical references for policy-makers and business operators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Korea Trade
Journal of Korea Trade Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Korea Trade purports to support and encourage researches in the area of international economics, international business and foreign trade practices & laws. The Journal welcomes theoretical and empirical papers in the broadly-defined international trade issues and policy implications in the context of Korea Trade.
期刊最新文献
Legal Implications of U.S. CVD on Tires and Undervalued Currency in the WTO's SCM The Effect of Economic and Infrastructure Factors on the Formation of Electric Vehicle Supply Chain and Optimal Location Selection: Korea-US FDI Localized Knowledge Spillovers and Organizational Capabilities: Evidence from the Canadian Manufacturing Sector A Study on Co-movements and Information Spillover Effects Between the International Commodity Futures Markets and the South Korean Stock Markets: Comparison of the COVID-19 and 2008 Financial Crises Revisiting the Role of Imported Inputs in Asian Economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1