石油和天然气公司如何在 API RP 14E 侵蚀速度模型中为其 "清洁服务 "管道推导出 C 因子

Livinus A
{"title":"石油和天然气公司如何在 API RP 14E 侵蚀速度模型中为其 \"清洁服务 \"管道推导出 C 因子","authors":"Livinus A","doi":"10.23880/ppej-16000364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In designing pipeline facilities for production and transportation of oil, hydrocarbon gases or non-hydrocarbon gases – CO2 and H2 , consideration is given to pipeline integrity, flow assurance, operation and health/safety issues. Erosion-corrosion of the inner pipeline wall and/or high-pressure losses is of great concern. For many years now, many oil and gas field operators have adopted the America Petroleum Institute recommended practice 14E (API RP 14E) equation to estimate the erosional velocity. Unfortunately, the C-factor (which is an empirical constant) in the API RP 14E equation has been generalized to all field conditions. In addition, there is no concrete scientific evidence behind the basis of its formulation, and various values have been adopted based on field and laboratory experiences. In this work, we present how oil and gas companies could formulate safer erosional velocity models for their sand free or ‘clean service’ pipelines, based on the velocities calculated for the equilibrium flow rate (that is, the intersection of vertical lift performance (VLP) and inflow performance relationship (IPR)). The developed erosional velocity models can be applied, and compared with in-house correlations, for erosional velocity predictions","PeriodicalId":282073,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Oil and Gas Companies can derive C-Factors in the API RP 14E Erosional Velocity Models for their ‘Clean Service’ Pipelines\",\"authors\":\"Livinus A\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/ppej-16000364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In designing pipeline facilities for production and transportation of oil, hydrocarbon gases or non-hydrocarbon gases – CO2 and H2 , consideration is given to pipeline integrity, flow assurance, operation and health/safety issues. Erosion-corrosion of the inner pipeline wall and/or high-pressure losses is of great concern. For many years now, many oil and gas field operators have adopted the America Petroleum Institute recommended practice 14E (API RP 14E) equation to estimate the erosional velocity. Unfortunately, the C-factor (which is an empirical constant) in the API RP 14E equation has been generalized to all field conditions. In addition, there is no concrete scientific evidence behind the basis of its formulation, and various values have been adopted based on field and laboratory experiences. In this work, we present how oil and gas companies could formulate safer erosional velocity models for their sand free or ‘clean service’ pipelines, based on the velocities calculated for the equilibrium flow rate (that is, the intersection of vertical lift performance (VLP) and inflow performance relationship (IPR)). The developed erosional velocity models can be applied, and compared with in-house correlations, for erosional velocity predictions\",\"PeriodicalId\":282073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/ppej-16000364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/ppej-16000364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在设计用于生产和运输石油、碳氢化合物气体或非碳氢化合物气体(二氧化碳和 H2)的管道设施时,需要考虑管道的完整性、流量保证、运行和健康/安全问题。管道内壁的腐蚀和/或高压损失是一个非常值得关注的问题。多年来,许多油气田运营商都采用美国石油学会推荐实践 14E (API RP 14E)方程来估算侵蚀速度。遗憾的是,API RP 14E 公式中的 C 因子(这是一个经验常数)已被普遍应用于所有油田条件。此外,其计算公式背后并没有具体的科学依据,人们根据现场和实验室经验采用了不同的数值。在这项工作中,我们介绍了油气公司如何根据平衡流速(即垂直提升性能(VLP)和流入性能关系(IPR)的交叉点)计算出的速度,为其无砂或 "清洁服务 "管道制定更安全的侵蚀速度模型。开发的侵蚀速度模型可用于侵蚀速度预测,并与内部相关数据进行比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Oil and Gas Companies can derive C-Factors in the API RP 14E Erosional Velocity Models for their ‘Clean Service’ Pipelines
In designing pipeline facilities for production and transportation of oil, hydrocarbon gases or non-hydrocarbon gases – CO2 and H2 , consideration is given to pipeline integrity, flow assurance, operation and health/safety issues. Erosion-corrosion of the inner pipeline wall and/or high-pressure losses is of great concern. For many years now, many oil and gas field operators have adopted the America Petroleum Institute recommended practice 14E (API RP 14E) equation to estimate the erosional velocity. Unfortunately, the C-factor (which is an empirical constant) in the API RP 14E equation has been generalized to all field conditions. In addition, there is no concrete scientific evidence behind the basis of its formulation, and various values have been adopted based on field and laboratory experiences. In this work, we present how oil and gas companies could formulate safer erosional velocity models for their sand free or ‘clean service’ pipelines, based on the velocities calculated for the equilibrium flow rate (that is, the intersection of vertical lift performance (VLP) and inflow performance relationship (IPR)). The developed erosional velocity models can be applied, and compared with in-house correlations, for erosional velocity predictions
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Absorption of Crude Oil from Water Surface Using Shells of Periwinkle, Thales (Ngolo) and Oyster Exploitation and Development of Oil/Gas Marginal Fields in Nigeria and Romania: Technology, Rising Market Development Challenges & Sustainable Energy Transition Development of a New Correlation for Predicting Initial Water Saturation in Carbonate Reservoirs Review of the Technical and Economic Evaluation of the Use of Means of Simultaneous Independent Operation for Solving Technical Problems Advancing Reservoir Performance Optimization through UserFriendly Excel VBA Software Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1