Mahmoud Mohamed El-Misady, Ahmed Saied Abd El-Rahman, Ismail Abd El-Latif Shabayek
{"title":"对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者进行超声引导下腹横肌平面(Tap)阻滞与局部麻醉浸润的比较","authors":"Mahmoud Mohamed El-Misady, Ahmed Saied Abd El-Rahman, Ismail Abd El-Latif Shabayek","doi":"10.21608/amj.2023.326881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Post-laparoscopy analgesia of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still a challenge. Many studies have been carried out to find the effect of different analgesic techniques in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy including ultrasonic guided TAP block &wound infiltration of local anesthetic. Objective: To assess degree of pain control, duration of action, duration of postoperative analgesia, the effect on postoperative analgesic requirements in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and compare between Transversus abdominis plane block and local wound infiltration. Methods: 60 cases were enrolled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were divided randomly into two groups: TAP group: (n=30) patients of this group received TAP block performed by ultrasound guidance and LWI group (n=30) patients of this group received local anesthetic (ropivacaine).After surgery, Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was recorded at 1, 2,4,6,12,18 &24 hours. Requirement of rescue analgesia when VAS score ≥4, total dose of morphine received in 24 h were noted in both groups postoperatively. Results: The overall VAS during the first postoperative 24 hours was significantly lower in TAP group (P <0.001at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after surgery) and total analgesic consumption (morphine in mg) was lower in TAP group (8.2 mg) compared to LWI (12.2 mg). Conclusion: TAP block provides better postoperative pain control & reduce postoperative opioid requirement in comparison with local wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.","PeriodicalId":7627,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Medical Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON BETWEEN ULTRASOUND GUIDED TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS PLANE (TAP) BLOCK AND LOCAL ANESTHETIC INFILTRATION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Mohamed El-Misady, Ahmed Saied Abd El-Rahman, Ismail Abd El-Latif Shabayek\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/amj.2023.326881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Post-laparoscopy analgesia of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still a challenge. Many studies have been carried out to find the effect of different analgesic techniques in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy including ultrasonic guided TAP block &wound infiltration of local anesthetic. Objective: To assess degree of pain control, duration of action, duration of postoperative analgesia, the effect on postoperative analgesic requirements in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and compare between Transversus abdominis plane block and local wound infiltration. Methods: 60 cases were enrolled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were divided randomly into two groups: TAP group: (n=30) patients of this group received TAP block performed by ultrasound guidance and LWI group (n=30) patients of this group received local anesthetic (ropivacaine).After surgery, Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was recorded at 1, 2,4,6,12,18 &24 hours. Requirement of rescue analgesia when VAS score ≥4, total dose of morphine received in 24 h were noted in both groups postoperatively. Results: The overall VAS during the first postoperative 24 hours was significantly lower in TAP group (P <0.001at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after surgery) and total analgesic consumption (morphine in mg) was lower in TAP group (8.2 mg) compared to LWI (12.2 mg). Conclusion: TAP block provides better postoperative pain control & reduce postoperative opioid requirement in comparison with local wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Azhar Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Azhar Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/amj.2023.326881\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/amj.2023.326881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后镇痛仍是一项挑战。许多研究都在寻找不同镇痛技术对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的影响,包括超声引导下的 TAP 阻滞和伤口浸润局麻药。目的评估腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的疼痛控制程度、作用持续时间、术后镇痛持续时间、对术后镇痛需求的影响,并比较腹横肌平面阻滞和局部伤口浸润。方法:60 例腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者被随机分为两组:术后 1、2、4、6、12、18 和 24 小时记录视觉模拟评分(VAS)。记录两组患者术后 1、2、4、6、12、18 和 24 小时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、VAS 评分≥4 时的镇痛抢救需求、24 小时内接受的吗啡总剂量。结果与 LWI(12.2 毫克)相比,TAP 组术后 24 小时内的总体 VAS 显著降低(术后 6、12、18 和 24 小时的 P <0.001),镇痛剂总用量(以毫克为单位的吗啡)也较低(8.2 毫克)。结论与局部伤口浸润相比,TAP阻滞能更好地控制腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的术后疼痛,并减少术后阿片类药物的用量。
COMPARISON BETWEEN ULTRASOUND GUIDED TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS PLANE (TAP) BLOCK AND LOCAL ANESTHETIC INFILTRATION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
Background: Post-laparoscopy analgesia of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still a challenge. Many studies have been carried out to find the effect of different analgesic techniques in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy including ultrasonic guided TAP block &wound infiltration of local anesthetic. Objective: To assess degree of pain control, duration of action, duration of postoperative analgesia, the effect on postoperative analgesic requirements in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and compare between Transversus abdominis plane block and local wound infiltration. Methods: 60 cases were enrolled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were divided randomly into two groups: TAP group: (n=30) patients of this group received TAP block performed by ultrasound guidance and LWI group (n=30) patients of this group received local anesthetic (ropivacaine).After surgery, Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was recorded at 1, 2,4,6,12,18 &24 hours. Requirement of rescue analgesia when VAS score ≥4, total dose of morphine received in 24 h were noted in both groups postoperatively. Results: The overall VAS during the first postoperative 24 hours was significantly lower in TAP group (P <0.001at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after surgery) and total analgesic consumption (morphine in mg) was lower in TAP group (8.2 mg) compared to LWI (12.2 mg). Conclusion: TAP block provides better postoperative pain control & reduce postoperative opioid requirement in comparison with local wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.