自闭症儿童与对照组儿童智力比较试验研究:瑞文渐进矩阵和韦氏智力量表-III

IF 0.2 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Annals of Indian Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.4103/aip.aip_34_22
Priyanka Jog, S. Shelke, Ashish Chepure, A. Subramanyam, Mansi P. Somaiya, Surabhi Rathi, A. Kondekar
{"title":"自闭症儿童与对照组儿童智力比较试验研究:瑞文渐进矩阵和韦氏智力量表-III","authors":"Priyanka Jog, S. Shelke, Ashish Chepure, A. Subramanyam, Mansi P. Somaiya, Surabhi Rathi, A. Kondekar","doi":"10.4103/aip.aip_34_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Intelligence in children with autism has been a challenge for long. Previous studies have reported an uneven performance on intelligence tests. Better performance on Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) as compared to Wechsler's intelligence scale for children III (WISC-III) has been found in some studies. RPM is quick and easy to administer. Hence, there is a need to understand if RPM is a comparable test to tap the intelligence in children with autism. Aims and Objectives: To find the percentile intelligence quotient (IQ) scores of children with autism and neurotypical children using RPM and WISC III and to compare the performance of these two groups on IQ tests. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study including 15 children with autism and normal (neurotypical) children was done after institutional ethics committee approval. The subjects were subjected to WISC-III and RPM. Results: The study shows that neurotypical children perform better on intelligence tests than children with autism. Both tests can be used to measure intelligence in children with autism fairly owing to their correlation. However, RPM showed better scores than WISC-III, for children with autism. Conclusions: RPM can be used as an alternative and an even better test to measure intelligence in children with autism just as the standard WISC-III. Further studies in a larger population of children with autism are warranted to validate our findings.","PeriodicalId":52916,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Indian Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pilot study on comparison of intelligence in children with autism and controls: Raven's progressive matrices and wechsler intelligence scale-III\",\"authors\":\"Priyanka Jog, S. Shelke, Ashish Chepure, A. Subramanyam, Mansi P. Somaiya, Surabhi Rathi, A. Kondekar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aip.aip_34_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Intelligence in children with autism has been a challenge for long. Previous studies have reported an uneven performance on intelligence tests. Better performance on Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) as compared to Wechsler's intelligence scale for children III (WISC-III) has been found in some studies. RPM is quick and easy to administer. Hence, there is a need to understand if RPM is a comparable test to tap the intelligence in children with autism. Aims and Objectives: To find the percentile intelligence quotient (IQ) scores of children with autism and neurotypical children using RPM and WISC III and to compare the performance of these two groups on IQ tests. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study including 15 children with autism and normal (neurotypical) children was done after institutional ethics committee approval. The subjects were subjected to WISC-III and RPM. Results: The study shows that neurotypical children perform better on intelligence tests than children with autism. Both tests can be used to measure intelligence in children with autism fairly owing to their correlation. However, RPM showed better scores than WISC-III, for children with autism. Conclusions: RPM can be used as an alternative and an even better test to measure intelligence in children with autism just as the standard WISC-III. Further studies in a larger population of children with autism are warranted to validate our findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Indian Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Indian Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aip.aip_34_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Indian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aip.aip_34_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言长期以来,自闭症儿童的智力一直是一个难题。以往的研究报告显示,自闭症儿童在智力测验中的表现参差不齐。一些研究发现,与韦氏儿童智力量表 III(WISC-III)相比,瑞文渐进矩阵(RPM)的表现更好。RPM 施测快速、简便。因此,有必要了解 RPM 是否是一种可比的自闭症儿童智力测试。目的和目标:使用 RPM 和 WISC III 测试自闭症儿童和神经正常儿童的百分位数智商 (IQ) 分数,并比较这两组儿童在 IQ 测试中的表现。材料和方法:经机构伦理委员会批准,对 15 名自闭症儿童和正常(神经畸形)儿童进行了横断面研究。受试者接受了 WISC-III 和 RPM 测试。研究结果研究表明,神经畸形儿童在智力测验中的表现优于自闭症儿童。由于两者之间存在相关性,因此这两项测试都可以用来公平地测量自闭症儿童的智力。然而,对于自闭症儿童而言,RPM 的得分要高于 WISC-III 的得分。结论:RPM 与标准的 WISC-III 一样,可以作为测量自闭症儿童智力的替代测试,甚至是更好的测试。我们有必要在更多的自闭症儿童中开展进一步研究,以验证我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A pilot study on comparison of intelligence in children with autism and controls: Raven's progressive matrices and wechsler intelligence scale-III
Introduction: Intelligence in children with autism has been a challenge for long. Previous studies have reported an uneven performance on intelligence tests. Better performance on Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) as compared to Wechsler's intelligence scale for children III (WISC-III) has been found in some studies. RPM is quick and easy to administer. Hence, there is a need to understand if RPM is a comparable test to tap the intelligence in children with autism. Aims and Objectives: To find the percentile intelligence quotient (IQ) scores of children with autism and neurotypical children using RPM and WISC III and to compare the performance of these two groups on IQ tests. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study including 15 children with autism and normal (neurotypical) children was done after institutional ethics committee approval. The subjects were subjected to WISC-III and RPM. Results: The study shows that neurotypical children perform better on intelligence tests than children with autism. Both tests can be used to measure intelligence in children with autism fairly owing to their correlation. However, RPM showed better scores than WISC-III, for children with autism. Conclusions: RPM can be used as an alternative and an even better test to measure intelligence in children with autism just as the standard WISC-III. Further studies in a larger population of children with autism are warranted to validate our findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness in Different Sociodemographic Strata: Partial Validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in an Indian Sample Mindfulness in Different Sociodemographic Strata: Partial Validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in an Indian Sample Association of Ultrasound Abdomen Findings with Liver Function Test and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Scores in Cases of Alcohol Use Disorder Assessment of Anxiety Levels in Patients Scheduled to Undergo Magnetic Resonance Imaging An Observational Study to Assess Smartphone Usage in Patients of Anxiety and Depression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1