根据土耳其地震规范设计的钢筋混凝土高层建筑的渐进式坍塌评估

Munyaradzı Gondobwe, Aydın Demir
{"title":"根据土耳其地震规范设计的钢筋混凝土高层建筑的渐进式坍塌评估","authors":"Munyaradzı Gondobwe, Aydın Demir","doi":"10.16984/saufenbilder.1292075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, a numerical progressive collapse response evaluation was performed on a 40-story high-rise building designed according to the Turkish Earthquake Code of 2018 (TEC 2018). The alternate path method specified in the General Services Administration of 2016 (GSA-2016) and the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC 4-023-03) was used for the evaluation. A total of 18 scenarios were investigated for column and shear wall removals. In the cases where hinges were observed, the extent of damage was evaluated using the performance criteria given in the Turkish Seismic Code and the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 41-17. In this study, the most damage was observed when the corner column was removed at the bottom floor, while the least damage was observed on the shear walls close to the center and core of the building. For all the scenarios evaluated, no collapse was observed. The study showed that the high-rise buildings designed according to TEC-2018 have sufficient resistance to progressive collapse.","PeriodicalId":21468,"journal":{"name":"Sakarya University Journal of Science","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Progressive Collapse Evaluation of a Reinforced Concrete High-rise Building Designed According to Turkish Earthquake Code\",\"authors\":\"Munyaradzı Gondobwe, Aydın Demir\",\"doi\":\"10.16984/saufenbilder.1292075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, a numerical progressive collapse response evaluation was performed on a 40-story high-rise building designed according to the Turkish Earthquake Code of 2018 (TEC 2018). The alternate path method specified in the General Services Administration of 2016 (GSA-2016) and the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC 4-023-03) was used for the evaluation. A total of 18 scenarios were investigated for column and shear wall removals. In the cases where hinges were observed, the extent of damage was evaluated using the performance criteria given in the Turkish Seismic Code and the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 41-17. In this study, the most damage was observed when the corner column was removed at the bottom floor, while the least damage was observed on the shear walls close to the center and core of the building. For all the scenarios evaluated, no collapse was observed. The study showed that the high-rise buildings designed according to TEC-2018 have sufficient resistance to progressive collapse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sakarya University Journal of Science\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sakarya University Journal of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1292075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sakarya University Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1292075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,对一栋根据 2018 年土耳其地震规范(TEC 2018)设计的 40 层高层建筑进行了渐进式坍塌响应数值评估。评估采用了 2016 年总务管理局(GSA-2016)和统一设施标准(UFC 4-023-03)中规定的备用路径法。共调查了 18 种柱子和剪力墙拆除情况。在观察到铰链的情况下,使用土耳其抗震规范和美国土木工程师学会 (ASCE) 41-17 中给出的性能标准对损坏程度进行了评估。在这项研究中,当底层的角柱被移除时,观察到的损坏程度最大,而在靠近建筑物中心和核心的剪力墙上观察到的损坏程度最小。在评估的所有情况下,均未观察到倒塌现象。研究表明,根据 TEC-2018 设计的高层建筑具有足够的抗渐进式倒塌能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Progressive Collapse Evaluation of a Reinforced Concrete High-rise Building Designed According to Turkish Earthquake Code
In this study, a numerical progressive collapse response evaluation was performed on a 40-story high-rise building designed according to the Turkish Earthquake Code of 2018 (TEC 2018). The alternate path method specified in the General Services Administration of 2016 (GSA-2016) and the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC 4-023-03) was used for the evaluation. A total of 18 scenarios were investigated for column and shear wall removals. In the cases where hinges were observed, the extent of damage was evaluated using the performance criteria given in the Turkish Seismic Code and the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 41-17. In this study, the most damage was observed when the corner column was removed at the bottom floor, while the least damage was observed on the shear walls close to the center and core of the building. For all the scenarios evaluated, no collapse was observed. The study showed that the high-rise buildings designed according to TEC-2018 have sufficient resistance to progressive collapse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Detailed Comparison of Two New Heuristic Algorithms Based on Gazelles Behavior Determination of Pesticide Residues in Water Using Extraction Method Developing an optimization model for minimizing solid waste collection costs Fractal Approach to Dielectric Properties of Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes Reinforced Polymer Composites Evaluation of the Antigenotoxic Effect of Quercetin Against Antiepileptic Drug Genotoxicity by Comet Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1