永远的领域:研究全球北方的知识实践:来自全球南方的观点

Nithila Kanagasabai
{"title":"永远的领域:研究全球北方的知识实践:来自全球南方的观点","authors":"Nithila Kanagasabai","doi":"10.1080/13552074.2023.2261765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT While there is a multitude of academic work with respect to cross-border collaborations between South Asian countries and the US, almost all of it is produced by scholars located in US universities, either as tenured faculty or as doctoral students. Much of this work is predicated upon the access these scholars have to stakeholders in both countries, which is dependent on the predominantly one-way flow of gaze/theory from the global North. Based on in-depth interviews with Indian doctoral scholars enrolled in Women’s Studies and allied disciplines in universities in the US, but whose research fields are in India, this paper examines the ways in which coloniality structures the knowledges thus produced. Particularly, it examines how the construction of the ‘field’ is contingent upon complex processes such as visa regimes, funding opportunities to travel, and disciplinary framings. It argues that despite the increased focus on a globalised academia and movement of scholars and students around the world, material inequities continue to frame certain locations as ‘forever fields’. Finally, unpacking the politics of mapping a field, it poses the possibility of activating a disruption in the ways in which the category ‘field’ is perceived.","PeriodicalId":12515,"journal":{"name":"Gender & Development","volume":"47 1","pages":"399 - 416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forever fields: studying knowledge practices in the global North: a view from the global South\",\"authors\":\"Nithila Kanagasabai\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13552074.2023.2261765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT While there is a multitude of academic work with respect to cross-border collaborations between South Asian countries and the US, almost all of it is produced by scholars located in US universities, either as tenured faculty or as doctoral students. Much of this work is predicated upon the access these scholars have to stakeholders in both countries, which is dependent on the predominantly one-way flow of gaze/theory from the global North. Based on in-depth interviews with Indian doctoral scholars enrolled in Women’s Studies and allied disciplines in universities in the US, but whose research fields are in India, this paper examines the ways in which coloniality structures the knowledges thus produced. Particularly, it examines how the construction of the ‘field’ is contingent upon complex processes such as visa regimes, funding opportunities to travel, and disciplinary framings. It argues that despite the increased focus on a globalised academia and movement of scholars and students around the world, material inequities continue to frame certain locations as ‘forever fields’. Finally, unpacking the politics of mapping a field, it poses the possibility of activating a disruption in the ways in which the category ‘field’ is perceived.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender & Development\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"399 - 416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2023.2261765\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2023.2261765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ABSTRACT 虽然有关南亚国家与美国之间跨境合作的学术著作很多,但几乎所有这些著作都是由美国大学的学者撰写的,他们或是终身教职员工,或是博士生。这些研究成果的大部分取决于这些学者能否接触到两国的利益相关者,而这种接触又主要依赖于来自全球北方的目光/理论的单向流动。本文基于对在美国大学就读妇女研究及相关学科、但研究领域在印度的印度博士生的深入访谈,探讨了殖民主义如何构建由此产生的知识。特别是,本文探讨了 "领域 "的构建如何取决于签证制度、旅行资助机会和学科框架等复杂过程。它认为,尽管人们越来越关注全球化的学术界以及学者和学生在世界各地的流动,但物质上的不平等继续将某些地方框定为 "永远的领域"。最后,在解读绘制 "领域 "图的政治意义时,它提出了对 "领域 "这一概念的认知方式进行颠覆的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Forever fields: studying knowledge practices in the global North: a view from the global South
ABSTRACT While there is a multitude of academic work with respect to cross-border collaborations between South Asian countries and the US, almost all of it is produced by scholars located in US universities, either as tenured faculty or as doctoral students. Much of this work is predicated upon the access these scholars have to stakeholders in both countries, which is dependent on the predominantly one-way flow of gaze/theory from the global North. Based on in-depth interviews with Indian doctoral scholars enrolled in Women’s Studies and allied disciplines in universities in the US, but whose research fields are in India, this paper examines the ways in which coloniality structures the knowledges thus produced. Particularly, it examines how the construction of the ‘field’ is contingent upon complex processes such as visa regimes, funding opportunities to travel, and disciplinary framings. It argues that despite the increased focus on a globalised academia and movement of scholars and students around the world, material inequities continue to frame certain locations as ‘forever fields’. Finally, unpacking the politics of mapping a field, it poses the possibility of activating a disruption in the ways in which the category ‘field’ is perceived.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deaf cultures: towards decolonisation of body, disability, and deafness* The messy coloniality of gender and development in Indigenous Wixárika communities Perpetually Lost in Translation Who knows, who writes, and who decolonises? Dialogues about collaborative partnerships of a rural education initiative in post-accord Colombia Decolonising Southern knowledge(s) in Aidland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1