Chaitali Desai, Rosalie Wang, Maureen Pakosh, Brian Chan
{"title":"学生竞赛(卫生服务、经济学和政策变化)ID 1977283","authors":"Chaitali Desai, Rosalie Wang, Maureen Pakosh, Brian Chan","doi":"10.46292/sci23-1977283s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assistive technologies (AT) span a large range of products from mobility aides such as canes to electronic systems that provide reminders. These technologies are important in facilitating independence, recovery and improved quality of life for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, clinical and economic outcomes for AT evaluated in the scientific literature is unclear. Thus, the aim of this study is to review the clinical and economic evidence for AT in the SCI population. Scientific literature databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE and CINAHL will be searched using terms identified in collaboration with a Medical Librarian. In the first stage, the titles and abstracts of clinical studies and economic analyses of AT focused in SCI will be screened by two reviewers. This will be followed by a second stage full-text screening for inclusion in the review by the same reviewers. The types of ATs evaluated will be identified along with the outcomes measured. Where applicable, study results will be presented using summary statistics. Work is currently underway to identify the citations. Two reviewers will then screen the titles and abstracts. It is anticipated that a large majority of the citations will be screened out with a small number of studies remaining. Most studies are also expected to be for the clinical evaluation of AT with variable outcomes. The results of this scoping review will provide valuable insight on the types of AT where clinical and economic evidence is available and identify where the current research gaps are.","PeriodicalId":46769,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student Competition (Health Services, Economics and Policy Change) ID 1977283\",\"authors\":\"Chaitali Desai, Rosalie Wang, Maureen Pakosh, Brian Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.46292/sci23-1977283s\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Assistive technologies (AT) span a large range of products from mobility aides such as canes to electronic systems that provide reminders. These technologies are important in facilitating independence, recovery and improved quality of life for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, clinical and economic outcomes for AT evaluated in the scientific literature is unclear. Thus, the aim of this study is to review the clinical and economic evidence for AT in the SCI population. Scientific literature databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE and CINAHL will be searched using terms identified in collaboration with a Medical Librarian. In the first stage, the titles and abstracts of clinical studies and economic analyses of AT focused in SCI will be screened by two reviewers. This will be followed by a second stage full-text screening for inclusion in the review by the same reviewers. The types of ATs evaluated will be identified along with the outcomes measured. Where applicable, study results will be presented using summary statistics. Work is currently underway to identify the citations. Two reviewers will then screen the titles and abstracts. It is anticipated that a large majority of the citations will be screened out with a small number of studies remaining. Most studies are also expected to be for the clinical evaluation of AT with variable outcomes. The results of this scoping review will provide valuable insight on the types of AT where clinical and economic evidence is available and identify where the current research gaps are.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46292/sci23-1977283s\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46292/sci23-1977283s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
辅助技术(AT)产品种类繁多,从拐杖等助行器具到提供提醒功能的电子系统,不一而足。这些技术对于促进脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的独立、康复和提高生活质量非常重要。然而,科学文献对辅助器具的临床和经济效果评估尚不明确。因此,本研究的目的是回顾脊髓损伤人群使用辅助呼吸技术的临床和经济证据。 本研究将与医学图书管理员合作,使用确定的术语对包括 EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 CINAHL 在内的科学文献数据库进行检索。在第一阶段,将由两名审稿人筛选以 SCI 为重点的 AT 临床研究和经济分析的标题和摘要。随后,同一审稿人将进行第二阶段的全文筛选,以便纳入综述。将确定所评估的 AT 类型以及所衡量的结果。在适用的情况下,研究结果将采用汇总统计的方式呈现。 目前正在开展确定引文的工作。然后,两名审稿人将对标题和摘要进行筛选。预计大部分引文将被筛选掉,剩下少量研究。此外,预计大多数研究都是针对AT的临床评估,结果不尽相同。 此次范围界定审查的结果将为我们提供关于已有临床和经济学证据的 AT 类型的宝贵见解,并确定目前的研究缺口在哪里。
Student Competition (Health Services, Economics and Policy Change) ID 1977283
Assistive technologies (AT) span a large range of products from mobility aides such as canes to electronic systems that provide reminders. These technologies are important in facilitating independence, recovery and improved quality of life for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, clinical and economic outcomes for AT evaluated in the scientific literature is unclear. Thus, the aim of this study is to review the clinical and economic evidence for AT in the SCI population. Scientific literature databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE and CINAHL will be searched using terms identified in collaboration with a Medical Librarian. In the first stage, the titles and abstracts of clinical studies and economic analyses of AT focused in SCI will be screened by two reviewers. This will be followed by a second stage full-text screening for inclusion in the review by the same reviewers. The types of ATs evaluated will be identified along with the outcomes measured. Where applicable, study results will be presented using summary statistics. Work is currently underway to identify the citations. Two reviewers will then screen the titles and abstracts. It is anticipated that a large majority of the citations will be screened out with a small number of studies remaining. Most studies are also expected to be for the clinical evaluation of AT with variable outcomes. The results of this scoping review will provide valuable insight on the types of AT where clinical and economic evidence is available and identify where the current research gaps are.
期刊介绍:
Now in our 22nd year as the leading interdisciplinary journal of SCI rehabilitation techniques and care. TSCIR is peer-reviewed, practical, and features one key topic per issue. Published topics include: mobility, sexuality, genitourinary, functional assessment, skin care, psychosocial, high tetraplegia, physical activity, pediatric, FES, sci/tbi, electronic medicine, orthotics, secondary conditions, research, aging, legal issues, women & sci, pain, environmental effects, life care planning