增值税中性与企业现金持有--基于未抵扣增值税退税政策的研究

Yanxiang Xie, Jiaqi Qin, Zhen Jin, Mingyang Geng
{"title":"增值税中性与企业现金持有--基于未抵扣增值税退税政策的研究","authors":"Yanxiang Xie, Jiaqi Qin, Zhen Jin, Mingyang Geng","doi":"10.1515/cfer-2023-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper regards the uncredited value-added tax (VAT) refund policy promulgated in 2018 as an exogenous shock to improve the neutrality for VAT. Based on the statistics of listed companies in the non-financial sectors from 2013 to 2020, this paper applies the difference-in-differences (DID) approach to study the impact of the uncredited VAT refund policy on corporate cash holdings. The study finds that the policy has eased the impact of non-tax-neutral impact of non-refundable tax credits and lowered the level of corporate cash holdings. Furthermore, the analysis of capital sources verified that the policy has optimized the corporate capital conditions. These findings have proved to be robust after a series of tests. At the level of cross-sectional differences, the uncredited VAT refund policy exerts both “resource effect” and “signal effect”, enabling companies to reduce cash holdings in the dimensions of both tax endowment and market expectation. At the level of policy effects, the policy improved the corporate behavior of high cash holdings for the production and operation cycle, with more notable impact on enterprises with higher tax credit rating. At the level of economic consequences, the adjustment of corporate cash holdings induced by uncredited VAT refund policy has significantly improved operating performance and reduced performance volatility, with a greater impact on enterprises with high capital intensity. The research findings evaluate the uncredited VAT refund policy from the perspective of tax neutrality, laying a theoretical foundation for further optimizing the uncredited VAT refund policy and the modern fiscal, tax and financial systems.","PeriodicalId":505490,"journal":{"name":"China Finance and Economic Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VAT Neutrality and Corporate Cash Holdings —Based on the Research of Uncredited VAT Refund Policy\",\"authors\":\"Yanxiang Xie, Jiaqi Qin, Zhen Jin, Mingyang Geng\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cfer-2023-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper regards the uncredited value-added tax (VAT) refund policy promulgated in 2018 as an exogenous shock to improve the neutrality for VAT. Based on the statistics of listed companies in the non-financial sectors from 2013 to 2020, this paper applies the difference-in-differences (DID) approach to study the impact of the uncredited VAT refund policy on corporate cash holdings. The study finds that the policy has eased the impact of non-tax-neutral impact of non-refundable tax credits and lowered the level of corporate cash holdings. Furthermore, the analysis of capital sources verified that the policy has optimized the corporate capital conditions. These findings have proved to be robust after a series of tests. At the level of cross-sectional differences, the uncredited VAT refund policy exerts both “resource effect” and “signal effect”, enabling companies to reduce cash holdings in the dimensions of both tax endowment and market expectation. At the level of policy effects, the policy improved the corporate behavior of high cash holdings for the production and operation cycle, with more notable impact on enterprises with higher tax credit rating. At the level of economic consequences, the adjustment of corporate cash holdings induced by uncredited VAT refund policy has significantly improved operating performance and reduced performance volatility, with a greater impact on enterprises with high capital intensity. The research findings evaluate the uncredited VAT refund policy from the perspective of tax neutrality, laying a theoretical foundation for further optimizing the uncredited VAT refund policy and the modern fiscal, tax and financial systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Finance and Economic Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Finance and Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cfer-2023-0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Finance and Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cfer-2023-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 本文将2018年颁布的增值税不抵扣退税政策视为提高增值税中性的外生冲击。本文基于2013-2020年非金融行业上市公司的统计数据,运用差分法(DID)研究未抵扣增值税退税政策对企业现金持有的影响。研究发现,该政策缓解了不可抵扣退税的非税收中性影响,降低了企业现金持有水平。此外,对资本来源的分析验证了该政策优化了企业资本条件。经过一系列检验,这些结论被证明是稳健的。在横截面差异层面,未抵扣增值税退税政策同时发挥了 "资源效应 "和 "信号效应",使企业在税收禀赋和市场预期两个维度上减少了现金持有量。在政策效应层面,该政策改善了企业在生产经营周期中的高现金持有行为,对纳税信用等级较高的企业影响更为显著。在经济后果层面,未抵扣增值税退税政策引发的企业现金持有量调整显著改善了经营绩效,降低了绩效波动性,对资本密集度高的企业影响更大。研究成果从税收中性的角度对未抵扣增值税退税政策进行了评价,为进一步优化未抵扣增值税退税政策和现代财政、税收、金融制度奠定了理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
VAT Neutrality and Corporate Cash Holdings —Based on the Research of Uncredited VAT Refund Policy
Abstract This paper regards the uncredited value-added tax (VAT) refund policy promulgated in 2018 as an exogenous shock to improve the neutrality for VAT. Based on the statistics of listed companies in the non-financial sectors from 2013 to 2020, this paper applies the difference-in-differences (DID) approach to study the impact of the uncredited VAT refund policy on corporate cash holdings. The study finds that the policy has eased the impact of non-tax-neutral impact of non-refundable tax credits and lowered the level of corporate cash holdings. Furthermore, the analysis of capital sources verified that the policy has optimized the corporate capital conditions. These findings have proved to be robust after a series of tests. At the level of cross-sectional differences, the uncredited VAT refund policy exerts both “resource effect” and “signal effect”, enabling companies to reduce cash holdings in the dimensions of both tax endowment and market expectation. At the level of policy effects, the policy improved the corporate behavior of high cash holdings for the production and operation cycle, with more notable impact on enterprises with higher tax credit rating. At the level of economic consequences, the adjustment of corporate cash holdings induced by uncredited VAT refund policy has significantly improved operating performance and reduced performance volatility, with a greater impact on enterprises with high capital intensity. The research findings evaluate the uncredited VAT refund policy from the perspective of tax neutrality, laying a theoretical foundation for further optimizing the uncredited VAT refund policy and the modern fiscal, tax and financial systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Common Prosperity and Reshaping China’s Economic Cycle: Theoretical Logic and Empirical Evidence from a Political Economic Perspective Fiscal Pressure, Inter-Industrial Allocation of Land and Agglomerations Effects Digital Trade Rules and the Position of Chinese Enterprises in the Global Value Chain Digital Transformation, Information Search, and Women’s High-Quality Employment Analysis on Trade Gains from the Economic Dual Circulation in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1