冠状动脉内药物疗法(维拉帕米-肾上腺素-腺苷)用于预防 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗过程中出现无回流现象

A. Bendary, Mohamed Salem, Amr El-Sayed, Haitham Al-Kady, Ayman Khamis, Hany Ebaid
{"title":"冠状动脉内药物疗法(维拉帕米-肾上腺素-腺苷)用于预防 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗过程中出现无回流现象","authors":"A. Bendary, Mohamed Salem, Amr El-Sayed, Haitham Al-Kady, Ayman Khamis, Hany Ebaid","doi":"10.21608/bjas.2023.224991.1213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: When the TIMI flow is less than 3 or, in the instance of a flow of 3, when the MBG is 0 or 1, no reflow is detected (in the absence of evident vessel dissection, obstruction or distal vessel embolic cutoff). According to the TIMI flow count, the flow in the coronaries may be graded as 0 (no flow), 1 (penetration without perfusion), 2, or 3 (partial perfusion) (complete perfusion). Grade 0 indicates that there is no myocardial blush (or contrast density), while grade 1 indicates that there is continuing blush (staining) Grade 1 indicates the least amount of myocardial blush, grade 2 indicates significant myocardial blush (or contrast density), but less than that seen during angiography of a non-infarct-related coronary artery on the ipsilateral or contralateral side, and grade 3 indicates typical blush. Patients and Methods: This research included 128 individuals who had acute ST elevation myocardial infarction during the first 24 hours of experiencing symptoms and were treated at Wadi El-Nile and Ain Shams university hospitals between the years 2022 and 2023. In order to avoid STEMI patients from having no reflow during PPCI, the research compared the safety and effectiveness of intracoronary injections of epinephrine, verapamil, or adenosine against the control group. Aiming to evaluate TIMI flow grade, MBG, TIMI thrombus grade, ST segment resolution >70%, occurrence of no reflow, EF, LV diameters, and MACE status within 3 months, the study was conducted through 4 groups: group 1 received epinephrine, group 2 received adenosine, group 3 received verapamil, and group 4 did not receive pretreatment. Results: The epinephrine group, followed by the verapamil group, followed by the adenosine group, followed by the control group, had the best TIMI flow grade and MBG scores. After taking the medicines, there was no significant difference in the TIMI thrombus grade across the 4 groups. ST segment resolution varied quantitatively across the 4 groups, but there was no statistically significant difference. The three drugs—Epinephrine, Verapamil, and Adenosine—were all more successful than the control group when it came to preventing no reflow than they were individually. Between the 4 groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the EF and LV diameters. Within a 3-month period, there was no difference in the MACE status across the 4 groups. Conclusion: According to the available data, epinephrine, verapamil, and adenosine are safe and efficient in avoiding no-reflow in patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction during PPCI, with epinephrine performing best, followed by verapamil, then adenosine. To verify these results, more research with a bigger sample size and a longer follow-up period is needed.","PeriodicalId":8745,"journal":{"name":"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intracoronary Pharmacotherapy (Verapamil-Epinephrine-Adenosine) for Prevention of No Reflow during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction\",\"authors\":\"A. Bendary, Mohamed Salem, Amr El-Sayed, Haitham Al-Kady, Ayman Khamis, Hany Ebaid\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/bjas.2023.224991.1213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: When the TIMI flow is less than 3 or, in the instance of a flow of 3, when the MBG is 0 or 1, no reflow is detected (in the absence of evident vessel dissection, obstruction or distal vessel embolic cutoff). According to the TIMI flow count, the flow in the coronaries may be graded as 0 (no flow), 1 (penetration without perfusion), 2, or 3 (partial perfusion) (complete perfusion). Grade 0 indicates that there is no myocardial blush (or contrast density), while grade 1 indicates that there is continuing blush (staining) Grade 1 indicates the least amount of myocardial blush, grade 2 indicates significant myocardial blush (or contrast density), but less than that seen during angiography of a non-infarct-related coronary artery on the ipsilateral or contralateral side, and grade 3 indicates typical blush. Patients and Methods: This research included 128 individuals who had acute ST elevation myocardial infarction during the first 24 hours of experiencing symptoms and were treated at Wadi El-Nile and Ain Shams university hospitals between the years 2022 and 2023. In order to avoid STEMI patients from having no reflow during PPCI, the research compared the safety and effectiveness of intracoronary injections of epinephrine, verapamil, or adenosine against the control group. Aiming to evaluate TIMI flow grade, MBG, TIMI thrombus grade, ST segment resolution >70%, occurrence of no reflow, EF, LV diameters, and MACE status within 3 months, the study was conducted through 4 groups: group 1 received epinephrine, group 2 received adenosine, group 3 received verapamil, and group 4 did not receive pretreatment. Results: The epinephrine group, followed by the verapamil group, followed by the adenosine group, followed by the control group, had the best TIMI flow grade and MBG scores. After taking the medicines, there was no significant difference in the TIMI thrombus grade across the 4 groups. ST segment resolution varied quantitatively across the 4 groups, but there was no statistically significant difference. The three drugs—Epinephrine, Verapamil, and Adenosine—were all more successful than the control group when it came to preventing no reflow than they were individually. Between the 4 groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the EF and LV diameters. Within a 3-month period, there was no difference in the MACE status across the 4 groups. Conclusion: According to the available data, epinephrine, verapamil, and adenosine are safe and efficient in avoiding no-reflow in patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction during PPCI, with epinephrine performing best, followed by verapamil, then adenosine. To verify these results, more research with a bigger sample size and a longer follow-up period is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/bjas.2023.224991.1213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bjas.2023.224991.1213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当 TIMI 血流小于 3 时,或当血流为 3 时,MBG 为 0 或 1 时,未检测到回流(在没有明显的血管夹层、阻塞或远端血管栓塞截断的情况下)。根据 TIMI 血流计数,冠状动脉的血流可分为 0(无血流)、1(无灌注的穿透)、2 或 3(部分灌注)(完全灌注)。0 级表示没有心肌淤血(或造影剂密度),1 级表示有持续的淤血(染色),1 级表示心肌淤血量最少,2 级表示有明显的心肌淤血(或造影剂密度),但少于同侧或对侧非梗死相关冠状动脉血管造影时的心肌淤血量,3 级表示典型的淤血。患者和方法:研究对象包括在 2022 年至 2023 年期间,在出现症状后 24 小时内发生急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死,并在 Wadi El-Nile 和 Ain Shams 大学医院接受治疗的 128 名患者。为了避免 STEMI 患者在冠状动脉造影术(PPCI)中出现无回流的情况,研究比较了冠状动脉内注射肾上腺素、维拉帕米或腺苷与对照组的安全性和有效性。研究分为四组,第一组接受肾上腺素治疗,第二组接受腺苷治疗,第三组接受维拉帕米治疗,第四组不接受预处理,旨在评估 TIMI 血流分级、MBG、TIMI 血栓分级、ST 段血流分辨率 >70%、无回流发生率、EF、左心室直径以及 3 个月内的 MACE 状况。结果如下肾上腺素组、维拉帕米组、腺苷组和对照组的 TIMI 血流分级和 MBG 评分最高。服药后,4 组的 TIMI 血栓等级无明显差异。4 组的 ST 节段分辨率在数量上有所不同,但在统计学上没有显著差异。三种药物--肾上腺素、维拉帕米和腺苷--在防止无回流方面都比对照组更成功。在四组之间,EF 和左心室直径的差异没有统计学意义。在 3 个月的时间内,4 组患者的 MACE 状况没有差异。结论根据现有数据,肾上腺素、维拉帕米和腺苷能安全有效地避免 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者在 PPCI 过程中出现无回流,其中肾上腺素的效果最好,其次是维拉帕米,然后是腺苷。要验证这些结果,还需要更多样本量更大、随访时间更长的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intracoronary Pharmacotherapy (Verapamil-Epinephrine-Adenosine) for Prevention of No Reflow during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Background: When the TIMI flow is less than 3 or, in the instance of a flow of 3, when the MBG is 0 or 1, no reflow is detected (in the absence of evident vessel dissection, obstruction or distal vessel embolic cutoff). According to the TIMI flow count, the flow in the coronaries may be graded as 0 (no flow), 1 (penetration without perfusion), 2, or 3 (partial perfusion) (complete perfusion). Grade 0 indicates that there is no myocardial blush (or contrast density), while grade 1 indicates that there is continuing blush (staining) Grade 1 indicates the least amount of myocardial blush, grade 2 indicates significant myocardial blush (or contrast density), but less than that seen during angiography of a non-infarct-related coronary artery on the ipsilateral or contralateral side, and grade 3 indicates typical blush. Patients and Methods: This research included 128 individuals who had acute ST elevation myocardial infarction during the first 24 hours of experiencing symptoms and were treated at Wadi El-Nile and Ain Shams university hospitals between the years 2022 and 2023. In order to avoid STEMI patients from having no reflow during PPCI, the research compared the safety and effectiveness of intracoronary injections of epinephrine, verapamil, or adenosine against the control group. Aiming to evaluate TIMI flow grade, MBG, TIMI thrombus grade, ST segment resolution >70%, occurrence of no reflow, EF, LV diameters, and MACE status within 3 months, the study was conducted through 4 groups: group 1 received epinephrine, group 2 received adenosine, group 3 received verapamil, and group 4 did not receive pretreatment. Results: The epinephrine group, followed by the verapamil group, followed by the adenosine group, followed by the control group, had the best TIMI flow grade and MBG scores. After taking the medicines, there was no significant difference in the TIMI thrombus grade across the 4 groups. ST segment resolution varied quantitatively across the 4 groups, but there was no statistically significant difference. The three drugs—Epinephrine, Verapamil, and Adenosine—were all more successful than the control group when it came to preventing no reflow than they were individually. Between the 4 groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the EF and LV diameters. Within a 3-month period, there was no difference in the MACE status across the 4 groups. Conclusion: According to the available data, epinephrine, verapamil, and adenosine are safe and efficient in avoiding no-reflow in patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction during PPCI, with epinephrine performing best, followed by verapamil, then adenosine. To verify these results, more research with a bigger sample size and a longer follow-up period is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of Cardiac Injury In Post COVID Children Etiopathogenesis of Acne Vulgaris Effect of Paternalistic Leadership Educational Program For Head Nurses on Staff Nurses’ psychological Empowerment Quality of Life among Patients with Helicobacter Pylori Infection Enhancing Nursing Personnel- physicians' Communication and Collaboration: Its Effect on Nursing Productivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1