从医护人员预先护理规划的自我效能中汲取的经验教训

V. Tripodoro, María Stella Di Gennaro, Julia Fila, Verónica Inés Veloso, Celeste Quiroga, Cristina Lasmarías Martínez
{"title":"从医护人员预先护理规划的自我效能中汲取的经验教训","authors":"V. Tripodoro, María Stella Di Gennaro, Julia Fila, Verónica Inés Veloso, Celeste Quiroga, Cristina Lasmarías Martínez","doi":"10.5603/pmpi.a2023.0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Advance care planning (ACP) is a reflective, deliberative, and structured process based on dialogue and free agreement between the person concerned and healthcare professionals. Argentina has no national ACP program or systematic approach for patients diagnosed with advanced chronic disease. Healthcare providers who treat these patients highlight some main obstacles in initiating the ACP process. Perceived self-efficacy is one of the main predictors of success in learning processes and promotes the acquisition of new behaviours and positive results in implementing ACP. We aimed to sensitise professionals and explore their self-efficacy for ACP before specific training. Participants and methods: This exploratory, prospective, descriptive study used the self-efficacy ACP-SEs scale already validated in Argentina. We surveyed 236 healthcare professionals (n 125 physicians/n 111 non-physicians) before specific training courses (2019–2021). Results: Participants’ experience, training needs, and practices. Most respondents were females (43 years old). Non-physicians (n 111) were 40 nurses, 32 psychologists, 16 social workers, 15 physiotherapists, and 8 other health backgrounds. Over 50% had 5–20 years of professional and primary care experience. When comparing professions, half of the physicians increased by up to 5.23 points higher on the self-efficacy scale than non-physicians. Most participants had no personal advance directives and neither helped a relative nor a patient sign a document. Half of the participants had previously undergone training. Half of the professionals who had done ACP significantly increased their value on the scale by up to 7.5 points more than those who did not. Differences between physicians and non-physicians revealed areas of improvement involving communication skills, roles and tasks, and legal issues. Conclusions: Healthcare providers' skills improve with experience and require training to increase self-efficacy. Our findings should encourage tailor-made training programs in the future. One of the goals of this study was to spark discussions before specific training courses and develop appropriate teaching methods based on perceived self-efficacy in Argentina.","PeriodicalId":19965,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine in Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons learned from self-efficacy of healthcare professionals for advance care planning\",\"authors\":\"V. Tripodoro, María Stella Di Gennaro, Julia Fila, Verónica Inés Veloso, Celeste Quiroga, Cristina Lasmarías Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/pmpi.a2023.0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Advance care planning (ACP) is a reflective, deliberative, and structured process based on dialogue and free agreement between the person concerned and healthcare professionals. Argentina has no national ACP program or systematic approach for patients diagnosed with advanced chronic disease. Healthcare providers who treat these patients highlight some main obstacles in initiating the ACP process. Perceived self-efficacy is one of the main predictors of success in learning processes and promotes the acquisition of new behaviours and positive results in implementing ACP. We aimed to sensitise professionals and explore their self-efficacy for ACP before specific training. Participants and methods: This exploratory, prospective, descriptive study used the self-efficacy ACP-SEs scale already validated in Argentina. We surveyed 236 healthcare professionals (n 125 physicians/n 111 non-physicians) before specific training courses (2019–2021). Results: Participants’ experience, training needs, and practices. Most respondents were females (43 years old). Non-physicians (n 111) were 40 nurses, 32 psychologists, 16 social workers, 15 physiotherapists, and 8 other health backgrounds. Over 50% had 5–20 years of professional and primary care experience. When comparing professions, half of the physicians increased by up to 5.23 points higher on the self-efficacy scale than non-physicians. Most participants had no personal advance directives and neither helped a relative nor a patient sign a document. Half of the participants had previously undergone training. Half of the professionals who had done ACP significantly increased their value on the scale by up to 7.5 points more than those who did not. Differences between physicians and non-physicians revealed areas of improvement involving communication skills, roles and tasks, and legal issues. Conclusions: Healthcare providers' skills improve with experience and require training to increase self-efficacy. Our findings should encourage tailor-made training programs in the future. One of the goals of this study was to spark discussions before specific training courses and develop appropriate teaching methods based on perceived self-efficacy in Argentina.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Medicine in Practice\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Medicine in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/pmpi.a2023.0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/pmpi.a2023.0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预先护理计划(ACP)是一个反思、审议和结构化的过程,基于当事人与医疗保健专业人员之间的对话和自由协议。阿根廷没有针对晚期慢性病患者的全国性 ACP 计划或系统方法。为这些患者提供治疗的医护人员强调了启动 ACP 过程的一些主要障碍。自我效能感是预测学习过程成功与否的主要因素之一,它能促进新行为的获得,并在实施 ACP 过程中取得积极成果。我们的目的是在具体培训之前提高专业人员的认识,并探索他们对 ACP 的自我效能感。参与者和方法:这项探索性、前瞻性和描述性研究使用了已在阿根廷验证的 ACP-SEs 自我效能量表。我们在特定培训课程(2019-2021 年)之前对 236 名医疗保健专业人员(n 125 名医生/n 111 名非医生)进行了调查。调查结果显示参与者的经验、培训需求和实践。大多数受访者为女性(43 岁)。非医生(n 111)包括 40 名护士、32 名心理学家、16 名社会工作者、15 名物理治疗师和 8 名其他健康背景的人员。超过 50%的人拥有 5-20 年的专业和初级医疗经验。在进行职业比较时,半数医生的自我效能感比非医生高出 5.23 分。大多数参与者没有个人预嘱,既没有帮助亲属也没有帮助病人签署文件。半数参与者以前接受过培训。半数接受过 ACP 培训的专业人士比未接受过培训的专业人士在量表上的分值显著提高了 7.5 分。医生和非医生之间的差异表明,他们在沟通技巧、角色和任务以及法律问题方面都有所改进。结论:医疗服务提供者的技能会随着经验的积累而提高,需要通过培训来增强自我效能感。我们的研究结果应鼓励今后开展量身定制的培训计划。本研究的目标之一是在具体培训课程前引发讨论,并根据阿根廷人的自我效能感制定适当的教学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lessons learned from self-efficacy of healthcare professionals for advance care planning
Background: Advance care planning (ACP) is a reflective, deliberative, and structured process based on dialogue and free agreement between the person concerned and healthcare professionals. Argentina has no national ACP program or systematic approach for patients diagnosed with advanced chronic disease. Healthcare providers who treat these patients highlight some main obstacles in initiating the ACP process. Perceived self-efficacy is one of the main predictors of success in learning processes and promotes the acquisition of new behaviours and positive results in implementing ACP. We aimed to sensitise professionals and explore their self-efficacy for ACP before specific training. Participants and methods: This exploratory, prospective, descriptive study used the self-efficacy ACP-SEs scale already validated in Argentina. We surveyed 236 healthcare professionals (n 125 physicians/n 111 non-physicians) before specific training courses (2019–2021). Results: Participants’ experience, training needs, and practices. Most respondents were females (43 years old). Non-physicians (n 111) were 40 nurses, 32 psychologists, 16 social workers, 15 physiotherapists, and 8 other health backgrounds. Over 50% had 5–20 years of professional and primary care experience. When comparing professions, half of the physicians increased by up to 5.23 points higher on the self-efficacy scale than non-physicians. Most participants had no personal advance directives and neither helped a relative nor a patient sign a document. Half of the participants had previously undergone training. Half of the professionals who had done ACP significantly increased their value on the scale by up to 7.5 points more than those who did not. Differences between physicians and non-physicians revealed areas of improvement involving communication skills, roles and tasks, and legal issues. Conclusions: Healthcare providers' skills improve with experience and require training to increase self-efficacy. Our findings should encourage tailor-made training programs in the future. One of the goals of this study was to spark discussions before specific training courses and develop appropriate teaching methods based on perceived self-efficacy in Argentina.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine in Practice
Palliative Medicine in Practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and experiences about medical cannabis in palliative care patients and caregivers in Thailand: a qualitative study Effectiveness of an online educational intervention for pressure injury prevention in caregivers: a pre-test post-test study Anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) in a Palliative care setting Unravelling the landscape of image-guided radiotherapy: a comprehensive overview Gastrostomies and clinical outcomes: a cohort of different enteral feeding techniques in advanced cancer palliative care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1