律师收入征税:改变法律规定的趋势

O.A. Borshchevsky
{"title":"律师收入征税:改变法律规定的趋势","authors":"O.A. Borshchevsky","doi":"10.15330/apiclu.62.1.36-1.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of taxation of advocacy is undergoing a new stage of discussion and debate. Today, the taxation of a lawyer’s income depends on whether the lawyer works individually, as a self-employed person, or as an employee under an employment contract in a law office or association.Working independently, a lawyer pays tax and other mandatory payments in the total amount of about 42% (personal income tax 18%, military levy 1.5%, single social contribution 22%), while persons who are on the simplified system taxation, pay a single tax (for example 5%) and a social contribution.Laws (bill) No. 2200, No. 2200-1, which provide for the right of lawyers, as self-employed persons, to be on the simplified taxation system for the main type of their activity (activity in the field of law) introduce novelty in this matter.The issue of the lawyer’s right to choose the taxation system, in particular, the simplified taxation system, which is applied to individual entrepreneurs, remains debatable in the context of guarantees of the stability and independence of the lawyer’s activity, provided for by the interests of the state and the lawyer. The importance of transparency of tax relations and the validity of simplifying state control over tax assessment and payment are discussed.At the theoretical level, the effectiveness and efficiency of tax payment and the increase of budget revenues from advocacy activities in the case of the legislative granting of the right to a simplified taxation system to an attorney are ascertained. It is indicated that such an approach corresponds to the principle of fairness and impartiality to the lawyer’s activity in terms of its taxation.The article reveals the problem of discrimination of self-employed persons and entrepreneurs in the field of taxation. The material presents an analysis of draft laws and their rationale. Tendencies to changes in the legal regulation of tax relations of self-employed persons are outlined. A comparison of the features of advocacy and entrepreneurial activity was carried out. Attention is focused on the issue of taxation of the lawyer’s income. The regulatory and legal regulation of tax collection from advocacy activities is characterized. The judicial practice and legal positions of the Supreme Court have been elaborated and their influence on the formation of the object of taxation from advocacy activities has been outlined. Arguments were searched for the need to legislate for the lawyer the right to choose between the general and simplified taxation systems. The conclusion is made about the need to regulate the lawyer’s right to choose the taxation system, which is a constituent element of guaranteeing the lawyer’s independence.","PeriodicalId":196689,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","volume":"381 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taxation of the lawyer’s income: trends to change the legal regulation\",\"authors\":\"O.A. Borshchevsky\",\"doi\":\"10.15330/apiclu.62.1.36-1.52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The issue of taxation of advocacy is undergoing a new stage of discussion and debate. Today, the taxation of a lawyer’s income depends on whether the lawyer works individually, as a self-employed person, or as an employee under an employment contract in a law office or association.Working independently, a lawyer pays tax and other mandatory payments in the total amount of about 42% (personal income tax 18%, military levy 1.5%, single social contribution 22%), while persons who are on the simplified system taxation, pay a single tax (for example 5%) and a social contribution.Laws (bill) No. 2200, No. 2200-1, which provide for the right of lawyers, as self-employed persons, to be on the simplified taxation system for the main type of their activity (activity in the field of law) introduce novelty in this matter.The issue of the lawyer’s right to choose the taxation system, in particular, the simplified taxation system, which is applied to individual entrepreneurs, remains debatable in the context of guarantees of the stability and independence of the lawyer’s activity, provided for by the interests of the state and the lawyer. The importance of transparency of tax relations and the validity of simplifying state control over tax assessment and payment are discussed.At the theoretical level, the effectiveness and efficiency of tax payment and the increase of budget revenues from advocacy activities in the case of the legislative granting of the right to a simplified taxation system to an attorney are ascertained. It is indicated that such an approach corresponds to the principle of fairness and impartiality to the lawyer’s activity in terms of its taxation.The article reveals the problem of discrimination of self-employed persons and entrepreneurs in the field of taxation. The material presents an analysis of draft laws and their rationale. Tendencies to changes in the legal regulation of tax relations of self-employed persons are outlined. A comparison of the features of advocacy and entrepreneurial activity was carried out. Attention is focused on the issue of taxation of the lawyer’s income. The regulatory and legal regulation of tax collection from advocacy activities is characterized. The judicial practice and legal positions of the Supreme Court have been elaborated and their influence on the formation of the object of taxation from advocacy activities has been outlined. Arguments were searched for the need to legislate for the lawyer the right to choose between the general and simplified taxation systems. The conclusion is made about the need to regulate the lawyer’s right to choose the taxation system, which is a constituent element of guaranteeing the lawyer’s independence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine\",\"volume\":\"381 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15330/apiclu.62.1.36-1.52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15330/apiclu.62.1.36-1.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

辩护税问题正处于讨论和辩论的新阶段。如今,律师收入的征税取决于律师是以个人身份、自营职业者的身份,还是以律师事务所或协会雇用合同规定的雇员的身份工作。律师独立工作时,要缴纳税款和其他强制性付款,总额约为 42%(个人所得税 18%、军事税 1.5%、单一社会分摊金 22%),而按简化税制纳税的人只需缴纳单一税款(例如 5%)和社会分摊金。第 2200 号法律(法案)和第 2200-1 号法律(法案)规定,律师作为自营职业者,有权对其主要活动类型(法律领域的活动)适用简易税制,这给这一问题带来了新颖性。讨论了税务关系透明度的重要性以及简化国家对纳税评估和缴税控制的有效性。在理论层面上,确定了在立法赋予律师简化税制权利的情况下,纳税的有效性和效率以及宣传活动预算收入的增加。文章揭示了在税收领域对个体经营者和企业家的歧视问题。材料对法律草案及其依据进行了分析。文章概述了自营职业者税务关系法律规定的变化趋势。对宣传活动和创业活动的特点进行了比较。重点关注了律师收入征税问题。介绍了从辩护活动中征税的监管和法律规定。对最高法院的司法实践和法律立场进行了阐述,并概述了其对辩护活动征税对象形成的影响。论证了立法赋予律师在一般税制和简化税制之间进行选择的权利的必要性。结论是有必要规范律师选择税制的权利,这是保障律师独立性的一个组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Taxation of the lawyer’s income: trends to change the legal regulation
The issue of taxation of advocacy is undergoing a new stage of discussion and debate. Today, the taxation of a lawyer’s income depends on whether the lawyer works individually, as a self-employed person, or as an employee under an employment contract in a law office or association.Working independently, a lawyer pays tax and other mandatory payments in the total amount of about 42% (personal income tax 18%, military levy 1.5%, single social contribution 22%), while persons who are on the simplified system taxation, pay a single tax (for example 5%) and a social contribution.Laws (bill) No. 2200, No. 2200-1, which provide for the right of lawyers, as self-employed persons, to be on the simplified taxation system for the main type of their activity (activity in the field of law) introduce novelty in this matter.The issue of the lawyer’s right to choose the taxation system, in particular, the simplified taxation system, which is applied to individual entrepreneurs, remains debatable in the context of guarantees of the stability and independence of the lawyer’s activity, provided for by the interests of the state and the lawyer. The importance of transparency of tax relations and the validity of simplifying state control over tax assessment and payment are discussed.At the theoretical level, the effectiveness and efficiency of tax payment and the increase of budget revenues from advocacy activities in the case of the legislative granting of the right to a simplified taxation system to an attorney are ascertained. It is indicated that such an approach corresponds to the principle of fairness and impartiality to the lawyer’s activity in terms of its taxation.The article reveals the problem of discrimination of self-employed persons and entrepreneurs in the field of taxation. The material presents an analysis of draft laws and their rationale. Tendencies to changes in the legal regulation of tax relations of self-employed persons are outlined. A comparison of the features of advocacy and entrepreneurial activity was carried out. Attention is focused on the issue of taxation of the lawyer’s income. The regulatory and legal regulation of tax collection from advocacy activities is characterized. The judicial practice and legal positions of the Supreme Court have been elaborated and their influence on the formation of the object of taxation from advocacy activities has been outlined. Arguments were searched for the need to legislate for the lawyer the right to choose between the general and simplified taxation systems. The conclusion is made about the need to regulate the lawyer’s right to choose the taxation system, which is a constituent element of guaranteeing the lawyer’s independence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidential activity of the court in civil and administrative proceedings: a comparative legal analysis The influence of jurisprudence of international treaty bodies on the interpretation of international treaties Administrative and legal mechanisms for ensuring the safety of the educational process in the conditions of martial law in Ukraine Simplified proceedings in the civil procedure of Poland Consideration of family cases by the court according to the rules of simplified litigation: a review of judicial practice and trends of change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1