不造成伤害:人道主义援助和中立在延长内战中的作用

IF 0.9 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Civil Wars Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/13698249.2023.2253101
Anisa Abeytia, Esther Brito Ruiz, John Sunday Ojo, Taha Alloosh
{"title":"不造成伤害:人道主义援助和中立在延长内战中的作用","authors":"Anisa Abeytia, Esther Brito Ruiz, John Sunday Ojo, Taha Alloosh","doi":"10.1080/13698249.2023.2253101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We review the impact of humanitarian actors in civil war through the examination of the concepts of neutrality and impartiality – embedded within the ‘do no harm’ principle. We argue that despite the rationale of principles seeking to detach international action from the embodied dynamics of conflict, these governing tenets have effectively served to reinforce power discrepancies between authoritarian regimes, opposition forces, and civilians in civil wars. Because humanitarian practices have so often been co-opted to strengthen the position of authoritarian regimes and inflict harm, we trace their impact in conflict networks and assess whether they serve to further protract and unbalance civil war.","PeriodicalId":51785,"journal":{"name":"Civil Wars","volume":"116 1","pages":"341 - 366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do No Harm: The Role of Humanitarian Aid and Neutrality in Protracting Civil Wars\",\"authors\":\"Anisa Abeytia, Esther Brito Ruiz, John Sunday Ojo, Taha Alloosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13698249.2023.2253101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT We review the impact of humanitarian actors in civil war through the examination of the concepts of neutrality and impartiality – embedded within the ‘do no harm’ principle. We argue that despite the rationale of principles seeking to detach international action from the embodied dynamics of conflict, these governing tenets have effectively served to reinforce power discrepancies between authoritarian regimes, opposition forces, and civilians in civil wars. Because humanitarian practices have so often been co-opted to strengthen the position of authoritarian regimes and inflict harm, we trace their impact in conflict networks and assess whether they serve to further protract and unbalance civil war.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Civil Wars\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"341 - 366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Civil Wars\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2023.2253101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Wars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2023.2253101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ABSTRACT 我们通过研究 "不造成伤害 "原则中所包含的中立和公正概念,回顾了人道主义行动者在内战中的影响。我们认为,尽管这些原则旨在使国际行动脱离冲突的具体动态,但在内战中,这些管理原则却有效地加强了专制政权、反对派力量和平民之间的权力差异。由于人道主义实践经常被利用来加强专制政权的地位并造成伤害,我们将追踪它们在冲突网络中的影响,并评估它们是否进一步延长了内战并使其失去平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do No Harm: The Role of Humanitarian Aid and Neutrality in Protracting Civil Wars
ABSTRACT We review the impact of humanitarian actors in civil war through the examination of the concepts of neutrality and impartiality – embedded within the ‘do no harm’ principle. We argue that despite the rationale of principles seeking to detach international action from the embodied dynamics of conflict, these governing tenets have effectively served to reinforce power discrepancies between authoritarian regimes, opposition forces, and civilians in civil wars. Because humanitarian practices have so often been co-opted to strengthen the position of authoritarian regimes and inflict harm, we trace their impact in conflict networks and assess whether they serve to further protract and unbalance civil war.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Civil Wars
Civil Wars POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
The Clashing Legacies of EPLF Rebel Governance in Post-Independent Eritrea Farming to Fighting: How Shifting Agricultural Incomes Only Impact the Most Powerful Rebel Group Beans, Bullets and Bandages? Gendered and Racialised Othering in the Depiction of Military Support Work Child Responsive Conflict Early Warning: Prioritizing Children in Peace and Security Forced Fallow Fields: Making Meaningful Life in the Myanmar Spring Revolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1