{"title":"文本学与文本批评：唐纳德-奥斯特洛夫斯基与将文本归于伊凡四世和安德烈-库布尔斯基","authors":"Charles J. Halperin","doi":"10.1353/see.2023.a912469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The texts attributed to Prince Andrei Kurbskii, notably his correspondence with Ivan IV and his History of the Grand Prince of Moscow , and to Ivan himself, first and foremost letters responding to Kurbskii, have long been central to historical analyses of Ivan’s rule and reign, providing unequalled evidence of Ivan’s political ideology in particular. Karamzin’s conceptualization of the two periods of Ivan’s reign, the ‘good’ Ivan of the reforms (1547–64) and the ‘bad’ Ivan’s reign of terror, the oprichnina (1565–72)","PeriodicalId":45292,"journal":{"name":"SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW","volume":"2 1","pages":"515 - 539"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Textology versus Textual Criticism: Donald Ostrowski and Attributing Texts to Ivan IV and Andrei Kurbskii\",\"authors\":\"Charles J. Halperin\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/see.2023.a912469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The texts attributed to Prince Andrei Kurbskii, notably his correspondence with Ivan IV and his History of the Grand Prince of Moscow , and to Ivan himself, first and foremost letters responding to Kurbskii, have long been central to historical analyses of Ivan’s rule and reign, providing unequalled evidence of Ivan’s political ideology in particular. Karamzin’s conceptualization of the two periods of Ivan’s reign, the ‘good’ Ivan of the reforms (1547–64) and the ‘bad’ Ivan’s reign of terror, the oprichnina (1565–72)\",\"PeriodicalId\":45292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"515 - 539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/see.2023.a912469\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/see.2023.a912469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Textology versus Textual Criticism: Donald Ostrowski and Attributing Texts to Ivan IV and Andrei Kurbskii
The texts attributed to Prince Andrei Kurbskii, notably his correspondence with Ivan IV and his History of the Grand Prince of Moscow , and to Ivan himself, first and foremost letters responding to Kurbskii, have long been central to historical analyses of Ivan’s rule and reign, providing unequalled evidence of Ivan’s political ideology in particular. Karamzin’s conceptualization of the two periods of Ivan’s reign, the ‘good’ Ivan of the reforms (1547–64) and the ‘bad’ Ivan’s reign of terror, the oprichnina (1565–72)
期刊介绍：
The Review is the oldest British journal in the field, having been in existence since 1922. Edited and managed by the School of Slavonic and East European Studies, it covers not only the modern and medieval languages and literatures of the Slavonic and East European area, but also history, culture, and political studies. It is published in January, April, July, and October of each year.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
