脓毒性休克患者的累积体液平衡与临床预后之间的关系:一项回顾性观察研究

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.4103/ijam.ijam_27_23
A. Dash, Sunil Jena, Pritam Chhotray, S. Panda, Shakti Mishra, Biswajit Nayak
{"title":"脓毒性休克患者的累积体液平衡与临床预后之间的关系:一项回顾性观察研究","authors":"A. Dash, Sunil Jena, Pritam Chhotray, S. Panda, Shakti Mishra, Biswajit Nayak","doi":"10.4103/ijam.ijam_27_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Aggressive fluid replacement is done in septic shock to compensate for the decreased stressed volume in view of peripheral vasodilatation. However, excessive fluid administration may lead to fluid overload, edema formation, and organ damage such as renal congestion and acute kidney injury. Hence, this study was conducted to estimate the effect of fluid balance in the 1st week of septic shock on mortality. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the use of intravenous fluids and cumulative fluid balance (CFB) during the first 7 days of septic shock in a 25-bed multidisciplinary intensive care unit (ICU) in Northern India at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Results: Based on the CFB, we classified patients as low CFB when CFB is <20 mL/kg and high CFB when it is >20 mL/kg. The 28-day mortality in the low CFB group was 4.7% and in the high CFB group 26.15%, which was statistically significant. With an odds ratio of 7.17, CFB in septic shock was a predictor of ICU mortality (confidence interval of 3.87–13). The length of stay between the two groups was also found to be statistically significant (11.7 ± 3.2 vs. 12.6 ± 3.8; P = 0.02). Conclusions: In patients with septic shock, a higher CFB on day 7 of ICU admission is independently associated with an increased risk of mortality and a longer ICU stay. The following core competencies are addressed in this article: Practice-based learning and improvement, Medical knowledge.","PeriodicalId":36495,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Academic Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"121 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between cumulative fluid balance and clinical outcome in patients with septic shock: A retrospective observational study\",\"authors\":\"A. Dash, Sunil Jena, Pritam Chhotray, S. Panda, Shakti Mishra, Biswajit Nayak\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijam.ijam_27_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Aggressive fluid replacement is done in septic shock to compensate for the decreased stressed volume in view of peripheral vasodilatation. However, excessive fluid administration may lead to fluid overload, edema formation, and organ damage such as renal congestion and acute kidney injury. Hence, this study was conducted to estimate the effect of fluid balance in the 1st week of septic shock on mortality. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the use of intravenous fluids and cumulative fluid balance (CFB) during the first 7 days of septic shock in a 25-bed multidisciplinary intensive care unit (ICU) in Northern India at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Results: Based on the CFB, we classified patients as low CFB when CFB is <20 mL/kg and high CFB when it is >20 mL/kg. The 28-day mortality in the low CFB group was 4.7% and in the high CFB group 26.15%, which was statistically significant. With an odds ratio of 7.17, CFB in septic shock was a predictor of ICU mortality (confidence interval of 3.87–13). The length of stay between the two groups was also found to be statistically significant (11.7 ± 3.2 vs. 12.6 ± 3.8; P = 0.02). Conclusions: In patients with septic shock, a higher CFB on day 7 of ICU admission is independently associated with an increased risk of mortality and a longer ICU stay. The following core competencies are addressed in this article: Practice-based learning and improvement, Medical knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"121 - 125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijam.ijam_27_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijam.ijam_27_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介鉴于外周血管扩张,脓毒性休克患者会积极补充液体,以补偿受压容量的减少。然而,过量输液可能导致液体超负荷、水肿形成和器官损伤,如肾充血和急性肾损伤。因此,本研究旨在估算脓毒性休克第一周的体液平衡对死亡率的影响。材料和方法:我们对印度北部一家三级教学医院拥有 25 张床位的多学科重症监护病房(ICU)中脓毒性休克最初 7 天内静脉输液的使用情况和累积体液平衡(CFB)进行了回顾性分析。结果根据CFB,当CFB为20 mL/kg时,我们将患者划分为低CFB。低 CFB 组的 28 天死亡率为 4.7%,高 CFB 组为 26.15%,具有显著的统计学意义。脓毒性休克患者 CFB 预测 ICU 死亡率的几率为 7.17(置信区间为 3.87-13)。两组患者的住院时间也有统计学意义(11.7 ± 3.2 vs. 12.6 ± 3.8; P = 0.02)。结论在脓毒性休克患者中,入住重症监护室第 7 天的 CFB 越高,死亡风险越高,重症监护室住院时间越长。本文涉及以下核心能力:基于实践的学习和改进、医学知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between cumulative fluid balance and clinical outcome in patients with septic shock: A retrospective observational study
Introduction: Aggressive fluid replacement is done in septic shock to compensate for the decreased stressed volume in view of peripheral vasodilatation. However, excessive fluid administration may lead to fluid overload, edema formation, and organ damage such as renal congestion and acute kidney injury. Hence, this study was conducted to estimate the effect of fluid balance in the 1st week of septic shock on mortality. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the use of intravenous fluids and cumulative fluid balance (CFB) during the first 7 days of septic shock in a 25-bed multidisciplinary intensive care unit (ICU) in Northern India at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Results: Based on the CFB, we classified patients as low CFB when CFB is <20 mL/kg and high CFB when it is >20 mL/kg. The 28-day mortality in the low CFB group was 4.7% and in the high CFB group 26.15%, which was statistically significant. With an odds ratio of 7.17, CFB in septic shock was a predictor of ICU mortality (confidence interval of 3.87–13). The length of stay between the two groups was also found to be statistically significant (11.7 ± 3.2 vs. 12.6 ± 3.8; P = 0.02). Conclusions: In patients with septic shock, a higher CFB on day 7 of ICU admission is independently associated with an increased risk of mortality and a longer ICU stay. The following core competencies are addressed in this article: Practice-based learning and improvement, Medical knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Academic Medicine
International Journal of Academic Medicine Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Postoperative urinary retention in colorectal surgery patients on an enhanced surgical recovery pathway Pap smear changes and cervical inflammation in women with infertility in correlation to clinical and microbiological findings Investigating molecular features that influence blood − brain barrier permeability of compounds Association between cumulative fluid balance and clinical outcome in patients with septic shock: A retrospective observational study Comparison of liquid-based cytology and conventional preparations in nongynecological cytology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1