非妇科细胞学中液基细胞学与传统制剂的比较

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.4103/ijam.ijam_25_23
Archana Buch, Mangesh Londhe, Tushar Patil, Hetal Rathod, S. Dhaliwal, C. Gore
{"title":"非妇科细胞学中液基细胞学与传统制剂的比较","authors":"Archana Buch, Mangesh Londhe, Tushar Patil, Hetal Rathod, S. Dhaliwal, C. Gore","doi":"10.4103/ijam.ijam_25_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The liquid-based cytology (LBC) has shown significant advantages over conventional preparation in cervical cytology. The use of LBC in aspiration and exfoliative nongynecologic cytology has been on the rise since the last few years with relatively few studies being available depicting its role in fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) from other sites. The study aimed to determine the diagnostic efficacy of LBC in nongynecological exfoliative as well as FNAC samples and compare the conventional and LBC methods for cytomorphological differences. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional, analytical study that included the samples collected from two tertiary care centers over 8 months (January 2022 to August 2022). A total of 168 consecutive samples of aspiration and exfoliative nongynecological cytology were included. In each case, two passes were carried out one for a conventional smear (CS) and the other for LBC by Eziprep/Thin Prep (TP) method followed by smear staining with H and E stain and Leishman's stain. The slides were studied by two observers for cellularity, background (blood and necrotic cell debris), informative background (such as colloid, stromal fragments, etc.), presence of monolayer cells, and cell architecture with nuclear and cytoplasmic details by a semiquantitative scoring system. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test on the SPSS program and histopathology correlation was attempted wherever available by using OpenEpi software version 3. Results: The mean age was 40 years, with the majority being females (70%). The TP smears were qualitatively superior to CS with statistical differences observed in fluid cytology. There was no statistical difference observed at other sites; except TP being superior to CS with regard to the background in breast cytology. The arithmetic mean in TP was higher than CS in all the parameters. Conclusions: The cytology smears of TP were qualitatively superior to CS in aspiration and nongynecological cytology. Overall diagnostic accuracy was comparable in both techniques. The core competencies addressed in this article are: Medical knowledge, Procedural skills, Practice-based learning and improvement, and Professionalism.","PeriodicalId":36495,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Academic Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"126 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of liquid-based cytology and conventional preparations in nongynecological cytology\",\"authors\":\"Archana Buch, Mangesh Londhe, Tushar Patil, Hetal Rathod, S. Dhaliwal, C. Gore\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijam.ijam_25_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The liquid-based cytology (LBC) has shown significant advantages over conventional preparation in cervical cytology. The use of LBC in aspiration and exfoliative nongynecologic cytology has been on the rise since the last few years with relatively few studies being available depicting its role in fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) from other sites. The study aimed to determine the diagnostic efficacy of LBC in nongynecological exfoliative as well as FNAC samples and compare the conventional and LBC methods for cytomorphological differences. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional, analytical study that included the samples collected from two tertiary care centers over 8 months (January 2022 to August 2022). A total of 168 consecutive samples of aspiration and exfoliative nongynecological cytology were included. In each case, two passes were carried out one for a conventional smear (CS) and the other for LBC by Eziprep/Thin Prep (TP) method followed by smear staining with H and E stain and Leishman's stain. The slides were studied by two observers for cellularity, background (blood and necrotic cell debris), informative background (such as colloid, stromal fragments, etc.), presence of monolayer cells, and cell architecture with nuclear and cytoplasmic details by a semiquantitative scoring system. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test on the SPSS program and histopathology correlation was attempted wherever available by using OpenEpi software version 3. Results: The mean age was 40 years, with the majority being females (70%). The TP smears were qualitatively superior to CS with statistical differences observed in fluid cytology. There was no statistical difference observed at other sites; except TP being superior to CS with regard to the background in breast cytology. The arithmetic mean in TP was higher than CS in all the parameters. Conclusions: The cytology smears of TP were qualitatively superior to CS in aspiration and nongynecological cytology. Overall diagnostic accuracy was comparable in both techniques. The core competencies addressed in this article are: Medical knowledge, Procedural skills, Practice-based learning and improvement, and Professionalism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"126 - 131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijam.ijam_25_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijam.ijam_25_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介在宫颈细胞学检查中,液基细胞学(LBC)与传统制备方法相比具有显著优势。自过去几年以来,液基细胞学在非妇科抽吸和脱落细胞学中的应用不断增加,但描述其在其他部位的细针抽吸细胞学(FNAC)中的作用的研究相对较少。本研究旨在确定 LBC 在非妇科脱落细胞学样本和 FNAC 样本中的诊断效果,并比较传统方法和 LBC 方法的细胞形态学差异。材料与方法:这是一项横断面分析研究,包括从两个三级医疗中心收集的样本,历时 8 个月(2022 年 1 月至 2022 年 8 月)。共纳入 168 份连续的非妇科细胞学抽吸样本和脱落细胞学样本。每个病例都进行了两次检查,一次是常规涂片(CS),另一次是采用 Eziprep/Thin Prep(TP)方法进行 LBC,然后用 H 和 E 染色法和莱什曼氏染色法进行涂片染色。切片由两名观察员通过半定量评分系统对细胞度、背景(血液和坏死细胞碎片)、信息背景(如胶体、基质碎片等)、是否存在单层细胞以及细胞结构(包括核和胞质细节)进行研究。统计分析使用 SPSS 程序的 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行,并使用 OpenEpi 软件版本 3 尝试进行组织病理学相关性分析。结果平均年龄为 40 岁,女性占大多数(70%)。TP 涂片在质量上优于 CS 涂片,在液体细胞学方面观察到统计学差异。除 TP 在乳腺细胞学背景方面优于 CS 外,其他部位无统计学差异。在所有参数中,TP 的算术平均值均高于 CS。结论在抽吸细胞学和非妇科细胞学方面,TP 的细胞学涂片在质量上优于 CS。两种技术的总体诊断准确性相当。本文涉及的核心能力包括医学知识、操作技能、基于实践的学习和改进以及专业精神。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of liquid-based cytology and conventional preparations in nongynecological cytology
Introduction: The liquid-based cytology (LBC) has shown significant advantages over conventional preparation in cervical cytology. The use of LBC in aspiration and exfoliative nongynecologic cytology has been on the rise since the last few years with relatively few studies being available depicting its role in fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) from other sites. The study aimed to determine the diagnostic efficacy of LBC in nongynecological exfoliative as well as FNAC samples and compare the conventional and LBC methods for cytomorphological differences. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional, analytical study that included the samples collected from two tertiary care centers over 8 months (January 2022 to August 2022). A total of 168 consecutive samples of aspiration and exfoliative nongynecological cytology were included. In each case, two passes were carried out one for a conventional smear (CS) and the other for LBC by Eziprep/Thin Prep (TP) method followed by smear staining with H and E stain and Leishman's stain. The slides were studied by two observers for cellularity, background (blood and necrotic cell debris), informative background (such as colloid, stromal fragments, etc.), presence of monolayer cells, and cell architecture with nuclear and cytoplasmic details by a semiquantitative scoring system. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test on the SPSS program and histopathology correlation was attempted wherever available by using OpenEpi software version 3. Results: The mean age was 40 years, with the majority being females (70%). The TP smears were qualitatively superior to CS with statistical differences observed in fluid cytology. There was no statistical difference observed at other sites; except TP being superior to CS with regard to the background in breast cytology. The arithmetic mean in TP was higher than CS in all the parameters. Conclusions: The cytology smears of TP were qualitatively superior to CS in aspiration and nongynecological cytology. Overall diagnostic accuracy was comparable in both techniques. The core competencies addressed in this article are: Medical knowledge, Procedural skills, Practice-based learning and improvement, and Professionalism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Academic Medicine
International Journal of Academic Medicine Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Postoperative urinary retention in colorectal surgery patients on an enhanced surgical recovery pathway Pap smear changes and cervical inflammation in women with infertility in correlation to clinical and microbiological findings Investigating molecular features that influence blood − brain barrier permeability of compounds Association between cumulative fluid balance and clinical outcome in patients with septic shock: A retrospective observational study Comparison of liquid-based cytology and conventional preparations in nongynecological cytology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1