各种超声造影模式在头颈部淋巴结诊断中的准确性比较--一项前瞻性研究

IF 0.4 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_171_23
Subharina Mahapatra, Manjula Hebbale, AmitA Mhapuskar, R. Halli, J. Visshishta, Simran Singh
{"title":"各种超声造影模式在头颈部淋巴结诊断中的准确性比较--一项前瞻性研究","authors":"Subharina Mahapatra, Manjula Hebbale, AmitA Mhapuskar, R. Halli, J. Visshishta, Simran Singh","doi":"10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_171_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Imaging is crucial for diagnosing head and neck pathologies, particularly those involving lymph nodes (LNs). Ultrasound can detect nodes even smaller than 2 mm in diameter. Objectives: The objectives were to assess the accuracy of the ultrasonography (USG) findings in differentiating malignant and non-malignant LNs. Materials and Methods: Forty patients with clinically palpable LNs in the head and neck region were assigned to either of the two groups based on the inclusion criteria. All the patients were subjected to greyscale sonography, then USG Doppler and USG elastography, and finally, USG-guided FNAB. All the data were tabulated for statistical analysis. A Chi-square test was used. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated. Results: In this study, sensitivity for greyscale USG was 82.8%, whereas sensitivity for USG doppler and USG elastography was 72.2% and specificity for greyscale USG, doppler, and elastography was 88.8%. Conclusion: USG Doppler and USG elastography can be used in conjunction with greyscale USG with high sensitivity and specificity to diagnose soft tissue pathology, particularly in the LNs of the head and neck regions.","PeriodicalId":31366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology","volume":"26 1","pages":"378 - 382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative accuracy of various modes of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of lymph nodes in head and neck region—A prospective study\",\"authors\":\"Subharina Mahapatra, Manjula Hebbale, AmitA Mhapuskar, R. Halli, J. Visshishta, Simran Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_171_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Imaging is crucial for diagnosing head and neck pathologies, particularly those involving lymph nodes (LNs). Ultrasound can detect nodes even smaller than 2 mm in diameter. Objectives: The objectives were to assess the accuracy of the ultrasonography (USG) findings in differentiating malignant and non-malignant LNs. Materials and Methods: Forty patients with clinically palpable LNs in the head and neck region were assigned to either of the two groups based on the inclusion criteria. All the patients were subjected to greyscale sonography, then USG Doppler and USG elastography, and finally, USG-guided FNAB. All the data were tabulated for statistical analysis. A Chi-square test was used. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated. Results: In this study, sensitivity for greyscale USG was 82.8%, whereas sensitivity for USG doppler and USG elastography was 72.2% and specificity for greyscale USG, doppler, and elastography was 88.8%. Conclusion: USG Doppler and USG elastography can be used in conjunction with greyscale USG with high sensitivity and specificity to diagnose soft tissue pathology, particularly in the LNs of the head and neck regions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"378 - 382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_171_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_171_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:成像对于诊断头颈部病变至关重要,尤其是涉及淋巴结(LN)的病变。超声波甚至可以检测到直径小于 2 毫米的淋巴结。研究目的目的:评估超声波检查(USG)结果在区分恶性和非恶性淋巴结方面的准确性。材料和方法:根据纳入标准,将头颈部临床可触及 LN 的 40 名患者分为两组。所有患者先接受灰阶超声检查,然后接受 USG 多普勒和 USG 弹性成像检查,最后在 USG 引导下进行 FNAB。所有数据均以表格形式进行统计分析。采用卡方检验。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果本研究中,灰阶 USG 的敏感性为 82.8%,而 USG 多普勒和 USG 弹性成像的敏感性为 72.2%,灰阶 USG、多普勒和弹性成像的特异性为 88.8%。结论是USG 多普勒和 USG 弹性成像可与灰阶 USG 结合使用,在诊断软组织病变(尤其是头颈部的 LN)方面具有较高的灵敏度和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative accuracy of various modes of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of lymph nodes in head and neck region—A prospective study
Background: Imaging is crucial for diagnosing head and neck pathologies, particularly those involving lymph nodes (LNs). Ultrasound can detect nodes even smaller than 2 mm in diameter. Objectives: The objectives were to assess the accuracy of the ultrasonography (USG) findings in differentiating malignant and non-malignant LNs. Materials and Methods: Forty patients with clinically palpable LNs in the head and neck region were assigned to either of the two groups based on the inclusion criteria. All the patients were subjected to greyscale sonography, then USG Doppler and USG elastography, and finally, USG-guided FNAB. All the data were tabulated for statistical analysis. A Chi-square test was used. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated. Results: In this study, sensitivity for greyscale USG was 82.8%, whereas sensitivity for USG doppler and USG elastography was 72.2% and specificity for greyscale USG, doppler, and elastography was 88.8%. Conclusion: USG Doppler and USG elastography can be used in conjunction with greyscale USG with high sensitivity and specificity to diagnose soft tissue pathology, particularly in the LNs of the head and neck regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology
Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology (JIAOMR) (ISSN: Print - 0972-1363, Online - 0975-1572), an official publication of the Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology (IAOMR), is a peer-reviewed journal, published Quarterly , both in the form of hard copies (print version) as well as on the web (electronic version). The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.jiaomr.in. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.
期刊最新文献
A Retrospective Study of Condylar Morphology by Digital Panoramic Radiographs Using mobile multimedia platform for teaching radiographic diagnosis Diode laser-assisted excision of oral soft-tissue lesions: A case series Evaluation of autoantibodies in oral submucous fibrosis: A clinicopathological study Hyporesponsiveness of Nerves of the Dental Pulp in Type 2 Diabetes – An Enigmatic Oral Sign
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1