讨价还价中的道德偏好

IF 1.2 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Economic Theory Pub Date : 2024-01-06 DOI:10.1007/s00199-023-01544-7
Pau Juan-Bartroli, Emin Karagözoğlu
{"title":"讨价还价中的道德偏好","authors":"Pau Juan-Bartroli, Emin Karagözoğlu","doi":"10.1007/s00199-023-01544-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We analyze the equilibrium of a bilateral bargaining game (Nash, 1953, Econometrica, 21: 128–140). where at least one of the individuals has a preference for morality (<i>homo moralis</i>). We show that the equilibrium set crucially depends on these moral preferences. Furthermore, our comparative static analyses provide insights into the distributional implications of individuals’ moral concerns and the composition of society. A comparison of the set of equilibria in our model with those under selfish preferences, Kantian equilibrium, fairness preferences, altruistic preferences, and inequality averse preferences reveals important differences.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":47982,"journal":{"name":"Economic Theory","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral preferences in bargaining\",\"authors\":\"Pau Juan-Bartroli, Emin Karagözoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00199-023-01544-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We analyze the equilibrium of a bilateral bargaining game (Nash, 1953, Econometrica, 21: 128–140). where at least one of the individuals has a preference for morality (<i>homo moralis</i>). We show that the equilibrium set crucially depends on these moral preferences. Furthermore, our comparative static analyses provide insights into the distributional implications of individuals’ moral concerns and the composition of society. A comparison of the set of equilibria in our model with those under selfish preferences, Kantian equilibrium, fairness preferences, altruistic preferences, and inequality averse preferences reveals important differences.\\n</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Theory\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-023-01544-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Theory","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-023-01544-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们分析了双边讨价还价博弈(纳什,1953 年,《经济计量学》,21:128-140)的均衡。我们的研究表明,均衡集在很大程度上取决于这些道德偏好。此外,我们的静态比较分析还让我们深入了解了个人的道德关切和社会构成对分配的影响。将我们模型中的均衡集与自私偏好、康德均衡、公平偏好、利他偏好和厌恶不平等偏好下的均衡集进行比较,可以发现两者之间的重要差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moral preferences in bargaining

We analyze the equilibrium of a bilateral bargaining game (Nash, 1953, Econometrica, 21: 128–140). where at least one of the individuals has a preference for morality (homo moralis). We show that the equilibrium set crucially depends on these moral preferences. Furthermore, our comparative static analyses provide insights into the distributional implications of individuals’ moral concerns and the composition of society. A comparison of the set of equilibria in our model with those under selfish preferences, Kantian equilibrium, fairness preferences, altruistic preferences, and inequality averse preferences reveals important differences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Theory
Economic Theory ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The purpose of Economic Theory is to provide an outlet for research - in all areas of economics based on rigorous theoretical reasoning, and - on specific topics in mathematics which is motivated by the analysis of economic problems. Economic Theory''s scope encompasses - but is not limited to - the following fields. - classical and modern equilibrium theory - cooperative and non-cooperative game theory - macroeconomics - social choice and welfare - uncertainty and information, intertemporal economics (including dynamical systems) - public economics - international and developmental economics - financial economics, money and banking - industrial organization Economic Theory also publishes surveys if they clearly picture the basic ideas at work in some areas, the essential technical apparatus which is used and the central questions which remain open. The development of a productive dialectic between stylized facts and abstract formulations requires that economic relevance be at the forefront. Thus, correct, and innovative, mathematical analysis is not enough; it must be motivated by - and contribute to - the understanding of substantive economic problems. Officially cited as: Econ Theory
期刊最新文献
Information design for weighted voting Beyond Hawks and Doves: Can inequality ease coordination? Everybody’s talkin’ at me: levels of majority language acquisition by minority language speakers Central bank communication and stabilization policies under firms’ motivated beliefs Transfers in climate action teams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1