评估基于社区的健康促进的经济方面的局限性和潜力:批判性评论》。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI:10.1007/s40258-023-00864-y
Philipp Weber, Leonie Birkholz, Riccarda Straub, Simone Kohler, Natalie Helsper, Lea Dippon, Klaus Pfeifer, Alfred Rütten, Jana Semrau
{"title":"评估基于社区的健康促进的经济方面的局限性和潜力:批判性评论》。","authors":"Philipp Weber,&nbsp;Leonie Birkholz,&nbsp;Riccarda Straub,&nbsp;Simone Kohler,&nbsp;Natalie Helsper,&nbsp;Lea Dippon,&nbsp;Klaus Pfeifer,&nbsp;Alfred Rütten,&nbsp;Jana Semrau","doi":"10.1007/s40258-023-00864-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Community-based health promotion (CBHP) interventions are promising approaches to address public health problems; however, their economic evaluation presents unique challenges. This review aims to explore the opportunities and limitations of evaluating economic aspects of CBHP, focusing on the assessment of intervention costs and outcomes, and the consideration of political-level changes and health equity. A systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science and PsycInfo databases identified 24 CBHP interventions, the majority of which targeted disadvantaged communities. Only five interventions included a detailed cost/resource assessment. Outcomes at the operational level were mainly quantitative, related to sociodemographics and environment or health status, while outcomes at the political level were often qualitative, related to public policy, capacity building or networks/collaboration. The study highlights the limitations of traditional health economic evaluation methods in capturing the complexity of CBHP interventions. It proposes the use of cost-consequence analysis (CCA) as a more comprehensive approach, offering a flexible and multifaceted assessment of costs and outcomes. However, challenges remain in the measurement and valuation of outcomes, equity considerations, intersectoral costs and attribution of effects. While CCA is a promising starting point, further research and methodological advancements are needed to refine its application and improve decision making in CBHP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":"22 2","pages":"165 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10864521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Limitations and Potentials of Evaluating Economic Aspects of Community-Based Health Promotion: A Critical Review\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Weber,&nbsp;Leonie Birkholz,&nbsp;Riccarda Straub,&nbsp;Simone Kohler,&nbsp;Natalie Helsper,&nbsp;Lea Dippon,&nbsp;Klaus Pfeifer,&nbsp;Alfred Rütten,&nbsp;Jana Semrau\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40258-023-00864-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Community-based health promotion (CBHP) interventions are promising approaches to address public health problems; however, their economic evaluation presents unique challenges. This review aims to explore the opportunities and limitations of evaluating economic aspects of CBHP, focusing on the assessment of intervention costs and outcomes, and the consideration of political-level changes and health equity. A systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science and PsycInfo databases identified 24 CBHP interventions, the majority of which targeted disadvantaged communities. Only five interventions included a detailed cost/resource assessment. Outcomes at the operational level were mainly quantitative, related to sociodemographics and environment or health status, while outcomes at the political level were often qualitative, related to public policy, capacity building or networks/collaboration. The study highlights the limitations of traditional health economic evaluation methods in capturing the complexity of CBHP interventions. It proposes the use of cost-consequence analysis (CCA) as a more comprehensive approach, offering a flexible and multifaceted assessment of costs and outcomes. However, challenges remain in the measurement and valuation of outcomes, equity considerations, intersectoral costs and attribution of effects. While CCA is a promising starting point, further research and methodological advancements are needed to refine its application and improve decision making in CBHP.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"165 - 179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10864521/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40258-023-00864-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40258-023-00864-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于社区的健康促进(CBHP)干预措施是解决公共卫生问题的有效方法;然而,对其进行经济评估却面临着独特的挑战。本综述旨在探讨评估 CBHP 经济方面的机会和局限性,重点是评估干预成本和结果,以及考虑政治层面的变化和健康公平。通过对 PubMed、Web of Science 和 PsycInfo 数据库的系统搜索,确定了 24 项社区保健计划干预措施,其中大部分针对的是弱势群体。只有五项干预措施包括详细的成本/资源评估。业务层面的成果主要是定量的,与社会人口和环境或健康状况有关,而政治层面的成果往往是定性的,与公共政策、能力建设或网络/合作有关。该研究强调了传统卫生经济评估方法在把握社区保健计划干预措施的复杂性方面存在的局限性。它建议使用成本-后果分析(CCA)作为一种更全面的方法,对成本和结果进行灵活、多方面的评估。然而,在成果的衡量和估价、公平考虑、部门间成本和效果归属方面仍存在挑战。虽然共同国家评估是一个很有希望的起点,但还需要进一步研究和改进方法,以完善其应用并改进 CBHP 的决策制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Limitations and Potentials of Evaluating Economic Aspects of Community-Based Health Promotion: A Critical Review

Community-based health promotion (CBHP) interventions are promising approaches to address public health problems; however, their economic evaluation presents unique challenges. This review aims to explore the opportunities and limitations of evaluating economic aspects of CBHP, focusing on the assessment of intervention costs and outcomes, and the consideration of political-level changes and health equity. A systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science and PsycInfo databases identified 24 CBHP interventions, the majority of which targeted disadvantaged communities. Only five interventions included a detailed cost/resource assessment. Outcomes at the operational level were mainly quantitative, related to sociodemographics and environment or health status, while outcomes at the political level were often qualitative, related to public policy, capacity building or networks/collaboration. The study highlights the limitations of traditional health economic evaluation methods in capturing the complexity of CBHP interventions. It proposes the use of cost-consequence analysis (CCA) as a more comprehensive approach, offering a flexible and multifaceted assessment of costs and outcomes. However, challenges remain in the measurement and valuation of outcomes, equity considerations, intersectoral costs and attribution of effects. While CCA is a promising starting point, further research and methodological advancements are needed to refine its application and improve decision making in CBHP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy provides timely publication of cutting-edge research and expert opinion from this increasingly important field, making it a vital resource for payers, providers and researchers alike. The journal includes high quality economic research and reviews of all aspects of healthcare from various perspectives and countries, designed to communicate the latest applied information in health economics and health policy. While emphasis is placed on information with practical applications, a strong basis of underlying scientific rigor is maintained.
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effective and Sustainable Drug Use in Hospitals: A Systematic and Practice-Based Approach. Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy Norms Based on the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 for China. Value is Gendered: The Need for Sex and Gender Considerations in Health Economic Evaluations. Assessing the Direct Impact of Death on Discrete Choice Experiment Utilities. Acknowledgement to Referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1