运动诱发的疼痛与膝关节骨性关节炎患者静息时的疼痛或身体功能无关。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY European Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI:10.1002/ejp.2236
José Antonio Lozano-Meca, Mariano Gacto-Sánchez, Joaquina Montilla-Herrador
{"title":"运动诱发的疼痛与膝关节骨性关节炎患者静息时的疼痛或身体功能无关。","authors":"José Antonio Lozano-Meca,&nbsp;Mariano Gacto-Sánchez,&nbsp;Joaquina Montilla-Herrador","doi":"10.1002/ejp.2236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA) is mainly characterized by pain. The assessment of KOA-related pain frequently focuses on different constructs subject to sources of bias or drawbacks, as the classical Pain at Rest (PAR). Movement-evoked pain (MEP), recently defined as ‘pain during walking’, emerges as a differential concept, since PAR and MEP are driven by different underlying mechanisms. Given the novelty of the MEP approach, its association with PAR or with different performance-based tests has not been studied in KOA yet.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross sectional study was conducted. PAR was measured, alongside the performance of four mobility tests and their corresponding MEP: Timed Up and Go Test, 10-metre Walk Test, 2-Minute Walk Test, and 6-Minute Walk Test. Association and agreement were explored for MEP versus PAR, while the correlation of the tests versus each corresponding MEP-measure was assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Neither association nor agreement were found in the duality MEP versus PAR. Also, the lack of association between the performance of a mobility test and the perceived level of pain during the development of the test was stated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Movement-evoked pain is neither related to pain at rest nor to functional performance in subjects affected by knee osteoarthritis. The results from our study suggest that MEP and pain at rest measure and refer to different constructs in knee osteoarthritis. The implementation of MEP as an outcome in exercise-therapy could enhance the tracking of results, as well as the development of tailored interventions under different conditions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>This research elucidates the relevance of MEP, recently defined as ‘pain during walking’, through the analysis of its association with PAR and with functional performance (measured through four mobility tests) in knee osteoarthritis. The results from our study highlight the absence of either association or agreement between MEP and PAR, fact that supports and endorses the idea that both concepts measure and refer to different constructs in knee osteoarthritis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.2236","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Movement-evoked pain is not associated with pain at rest or physical function in knee osteoarthritis\",\"authors\":\"José Antonio Lozano-Meca,&nbsp;Mariano Gacto-Sánchez,&nbsp;Joaquina Montilla-Herrador\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejp.2236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA) is mainly characterized by pain. The assessment of KOA-related pain frequently focuses on different constructs subject to sources of bias or drawbacks, as the classical Pain at Rest (PAR). Movement-evoked pain (MEP), recently defined as ‘pain during walking’, emerges as a differential concept, since PAR and MEP are driven by different underlying mechanisms. Given the novelty of the MEP approach, its association with PAR or with different performance-based tests has not been studied in KOA yet.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cross sectional study was conducted. PAR was measured, alongside the performance of four mobility tests and their corresponding MEP: Timed Up and Go Test, 10-metre Walk Test, 2-Minute Walk Test, and 6-Minute Walk Test. Association and agreement were explored for MEP versus PAR, while the correlation of the tests versus each corresponding MEP-measure was assessed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Neither association nor agreement were found in the duality MEP versus PAR. Also, the lack of association between the performance of a mobility test and the perceived level of pain during the development of the test was stated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Movement-evoked pain is neither related to pain at rest nor to functional performance in subjects affected by knee osteoarthritis. The results from our study suggest that MEP and pain at rest measure and refer to different constructs in knee osteoarthritis. The implementation of MEP as an outcome in exercise-therapy could enhance the tracking of results, as well as the development of tailored interventions under different conditions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>This research elucidates the relevance of MEP, recently defined as ‘pain during walking’, through the analysis of its association with PAR and with functional performance (measured through four mobility tests) in knee osteoarthritis. The results from our study highlight the absence of either association or agreement between MEP and PAR, fact that supports and endorses the idea that both concepts measure and refer to different constructs in knee osteoarthritis.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.2236\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.2236\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.2236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介膝骨关节炎(KOA)的主要特征是疼痛。对 KOA 相关疼痛的评估通常集中在不同的结构上,这些结构会产生偏差或缺陷,如经典的 "静息痛"(PAR)。运动诱发痛(MEP)最近被定义为 "行走时的疼痛",它是一个有区别的概念,因为运动诱发痛和运动诱发痛是由不同的潜在机制驱动的。鉴于 MEP 方法的新颖性,尚未在 KOA 中研究其与 PAR 或不同的基于表现的测试之间的关联:进行了一项横断面研究。在测量 PAR 的同时,还测量了四项行动能力测试及其相应的 MEP 的表现:定时起立行走测试、10 米步行测试、2 分钟步行测试和 6 分钟步行测试。研究了 MEP 与 PAR 之间的关联性和一致性,同时评估了测试与每个相应的 MEP 测量之间的相关性:结果:在 MEP 与 PAR 的双重测试中,既没有发现关联性,也没有发现一致性。结果:在 MEP 与 PAR 的二元性中,既没有发现关联性,也没有发现一致性。此外,移动测试的表现与测试过程中感知到的疼痛程度之间也没有关联:运动诱发疼痛既与静息时的疼痛无关,也与膝关节骨性关节炎患者的功能表现无关。我们的研究结果表明,运动诱发痛和静息痛测量的是膝关节骨性关节炎的不同结构。将 MEP 作为运动疗法的一个结果,可以加强对结果的跟踪,并在不同条件下制定有针对性的干预措施:这项研究通过分析 MEP 与 PAR 以及膝关节骨性关节炎患者的功能表现(通过四项活动能力测试测量)之间的关系,阐明了 MEP(最近定义为 "行走时的疼痛")的相关性。我们的研究结果表明,MEP 与 PAR 之间既无关联也无一致,这一事实支持并认可了这样一种观点,即这两个概念衡量和指代的是膝关节骨性关节炎的不同结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Movement-evoked pain is not associated with pain at rest or physical function in knee osteoarthritis

Introduction

Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA) is mainly characterized by pain. The assessment of KOA-related pain frequently focuses on different constructs subject to sources of bias or drawbacks, as the classical Pain at Rest (PAR). Movement-evoked pain (MEP), recently defined as ‘pain during walking’, emerges as a differential concept, since PAR and MEP are driven by different underlying mechanisms. Given the novelty of the MEP approach, its association with PAR or with different performance-based tests has not been studied in KOA yet.

Materials and Methods

A cross sectional study was conducted. PAR was measured, alongside the performance of four mobility tests and their corresponding MEP: Timed Up and Go Test, 10-metre Walk Test, 2-Minute Walk Test, and 6-Minute Walk Test. Association and agreement were explored for MEP versus PAR, while the correlation of the tests versus each corresponding MEP-measure was assessed.

Results

Neither association nor agreement were found in the duality MEP versus PAR. Also, the lack of association between the performance of a mobility test and the perceived level of pain during the development of the test was stated.

Conclusion

Movement-evoked pain is neither related to pain at rest nor to functional performance in subjects affected by knee osteoarthritis. The results from our study suggest that MEP and pain at rest measure and refer to different constructs in knee osteoarthritis. The implementation of MEP as an outcome in exercise-therapy could enhance the tracking of results, as well as the development of tailored interventions under different conditions.

Significance

This research elucidates the relevance of MEP, recently defined as ‘pain during walking’, through the analysis of its association with PAR and with functional performance (measured through four mobility tests) in knee osteoarthritis. The results from our study highlight the absence of either association or agreement between MEP and PAR, fact that supports and endorses the idea that both concepts measure and refer to different constructs in knee osteoarthritis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Harnessing the therapeutic effects of nature for chronic Pain: A role for immersive virtual reality? A narrative review Adolescent predictors of substance use in young adulthood among individuals with childhood-onset chronic pain: A follow-up study. Preoperative measures of pain at rest and movement-evoked pain in knee arthroplasty: Associations with pain and function outcome trajectories from a prospective multicentre longitudinal cohort study. Authors' reply to the comment by Kallewaard, Duarte, Eldabe and Thomson.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1