髋部骨折后的健康状况和能力感知:一项 RCT 的次要结果。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Gerontology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1159/000536131
Maureen C Ashe, Sanya Grover, Stirling Bryan, Wendy L Cook, Meghan G Donaldson, Penelope M A Brasher
{"title":"髋部骨折后的健康状况和能力感知:一项 RCT 的次要结果。","authors":"Maureen C Ashe, Sanya Grover, Stirling Bryan, Wendy L Cook, Meghan G Donaldson, Penelope M A Brasher","doi":"10.1159/000536131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hip fractures can have a significant impact on the lives of older people and their families. We conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of post-discharge comprehensive geriatric care (CGC) for community-dwelling older adults after a surgically repaired hip fracture. The objective of this study was to conduct a secondary analysis to compare changes in health status and perceived capability from baseline to 12 months after randomization with: the EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) (1) utility score and (2) visual analog scale (VAS); and (3) well-being as measured by participants' perceptions of their ability (or capability) toward completing life activities using the ICEpop Capability Measure for Older People (ICECAP-O).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We tested the effect of usual care (control) versus usual care and an outpatient CGC clinic (intervention) on mobility after hip fracture in community-dwelling older adults (65 years+). In this secondary analysis, we report the following outcomes: EQ-5D-5L utility score and VAS collected monthly via telephone and ICECAP-O collected in person three times at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Data were analyzed using area under the curve and regression adjusted for baseline values for utility scores and capability, and constrained longitudinal data analysis for VAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 53 older adults, including 34 women and 19 men, with mean (SD) age of 80 (8) years. There were no statistical or clinically meaningful differences between groups (control group - intervention group values) for all variables: utility score = -0.028 (95% CI: -0.071, 0.014; p = 0.18); VAS: -0.03 (95% CI: -0.39 to 0.33; p = 0.86); and capability = -0.021 (95% CI: -0.090, 0.046; p = 0.54).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no differences in outcomes between groups over 12 months, but values remained constant, contrary to a potential decline for this age group, especially after a major life event like a hip fracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":12662,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived Health Status and Capability after Hip Fracture: Secondary Outcomes from an Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Maureen C Ashe, Sanya Grover, Stirling Bryan, Wendy L Cook, Meghan G Donaldson, Penelope M A Brasher\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000536131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hip fractures can have a significant impact on the lives of older people and their families. We conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of post-discharge comprehensive geriatric care (CGC) for community-dwelling older adults after a surgically repaired hip fracture. The objective of this study was to conduct a secondary analysis to compare changes in health status and perceived capability from baseline to 12 months after randomization with: the EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) (1) utility score and (2) visual analog scale (VAS); and (3) well-being as measured by participants' perceptions of their ability (or capability) toward completing life activities using the ICEpop Capability Measure for Older People (ICECAP-O).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We tested the effect of usual care (control) versus usual care and an outpatient CGC clinic (intervention) on mobility after hip fracture in community-dwelling older adults (65 years+). In this secondary analysis, we report the following outcomes: EQ-5D-5L utility score and VAS collected monthly via telephone and ICECAP-O collected in person three times at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Data were analyzed using area under the curve and regression adjusted for baseline values for utility scores and capability, and constrained longitudinal data analysis for VAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 53 older adults, including 34 women and 19 men, with mean (SD) age of 80 (8) years. There were no statistical or clinically meaningful differences between groups (control group - intervention group values) for all variables: utility score = -0.028 (95% CI: -0.071, 0.014; p = 0.18); VAS: -0.03 (95% CI: -0.39 to 0.33; p = 0.86); and capability = -0.021 (95% CI: -0.090, 0.046; p = 0.54).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no differences in outcomes between groups over 12 months, but values remained constant, contrary to a potential decline for this age group, especially after a major life event like a hip fracture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536131\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言髋部骨折会对老年人及其家人的生活产生重大影响。我们针对髋部骨折手术修复后的社区老年人开展了一项出院后综合老年护理(CGC)的实用随机对照试验。本研究的目的是进行二次分析,比较从基线到随机化后 12 个月期间健康状况和感知能力的变化:EQ-5D-5L(1)效用评分和(2)视觉模拟量表(VAS);以及(3)幸福感,根据参与者使用 ICEpop CAPability measure for Older people(ICECAP-O)对其完成生活活动能力的感知来衡量:我们测试了常规护理(对照组)与常规护理和CGC门诊(干预组)对社区老年人(65岁以上)髋部骨折后行动能力的影响。在这项二次分析中,我们报告了以下结果:每月通过电话收集的 EQ-5D-5L 实用性评分和 VAS;以及在基线、6 个月和 12 个月时三次亲自收集的 ICECAP-O。数据分析采用曲线下面积法和回归法,对效用得分和能力进行基线值调整;对 VAS 采用受限纵向数据分析:我们招募了 53 名老年人,包括 34 名女性和 19 名男性,平均(标清)年龄为 80(8)岁。所有变量在组间(对照组-干预组值)均无统计学或临床意义上的差异:效用得分 = -0.028 [95% CI: -0.071, 0.014; p=0.18];VAS -0.03 [95% CI: -0.39 to 0.33; p=0.86];能力 = -0.021 [95% CI: -0.090, 0.046; p=0.54]:12个月内各组间的结果没有差异,但数值保持不变,这与该年龄组可能出现的下降相反,尤其是在发生髋部骨折等重大生活事件后:NCT01254942。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceived Health Status and Capability after Hip Fracture: Secondary Outcomes from an Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Hip fractures can have a significant impact on the lives of older people and their families. We conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of post-discharge comprehensive geriatric care (CGC) for community-dwelling older adults after a surgically repaired hip fracture. The objective of this study was to conduct a secondary analysis to compare changes in health status and perceived capability from baseline to 12 months after randomization with: the EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) (1) utility score and (2) visual analog scale (VAS); and (3) well-being as measured by participants' perceptions of their ability (or capability) toward completing life activities using the ICEpop Capability Measure for Older People (ICECAP-O).

Methods: We tested the effect of usual care (control) versus usual care and an outpatient CGC clinic (intervention) on mobility after hip fracture in community-dwelling older adults (65 years+). In this secondary analysis, we report the following outcomes: EQ-5D-5L utility score and VAS collected monthly via telephone and ICECAP-O collected in person three times at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Data were analyzed using area under the curve and regression adjusted for baseline values for utility scores and capability, and constrained longitudinal data analysis for VAS.

Results: We enrolled 53 older adults, including 34 women and 19 men, with mean (SD) age of 80 (8) years. There were no statistical or clinically meaningful differences between groups (control group - intervention group values) for all variables: utility score = -0.028 (95% CI: -0.071, 0.014; p = 0.18); VAS: -0.03 (95% CI: -0.39 to 0.33; p = 0.86); and capability = -0.021 (95% CI: -0.090, 0.046; p = 0.54).

Conclusions: There were no differences in outcomes between groups over 12 months, but values remained constant, contrary to a potential decline for this age group, especially after a major life event like a hip fracture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontology
Gerontology 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In view of the ever-increasing fraction of elderly people, understanding the mechanisms of aging and age-related diseases has become a matter of urgent necessity. ''Gerontology'', the oldest journal in the field, responds to this need by drawing topical contributions from multiple disciplines to support the fundamental goals of extending active life and enhancing its quality. The range of papers is classified into four sections. In the Clinical Section, the aetiology, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of agerelated diseases are discussed from a gerontological rather than a geriatric viewpoint. The Experimental Section contains up-to-date contributions from basic gerontological research. Papers dealing with behavioural development and related topics are placed in the Behavioural Science Section. Basic aspects of regeneration in different experimental biological systems as well as in the context of medical applications are dealt with in a special section that also contains information on technological advances for the elderly. Providing a primary source of high-quality papers covering all aspects of aging in humans and animals, ''Gerontology'' serves as an ideal information tool for all readers interested in the topic of aging from a broad perspective.
期刊最新文献
Healthy Aging at Moderate Altitudes: Hypoxia and Hormesis. Urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography treatment useful for acute cholangitis caused by bile duct stones in patients aged 90 years and older. A scoping review of fall-risk screening tools in the Emergency Department for future falls in older adults. Long-Term Effects and Impressions of Minimal Footwear in Older Adults. Towards senior-friendly hospitals: an overview of programs, their elements and effectiveness in improving care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1