用最大熵法共同估算地核和岩石圈磁场

Mikkel Otzen, Christopher C Finlay, C. Kloss
{"title":"用最大熵法共同估算地核和岩石圈磁场","authors":"Mikkel Otzen, Christopher C Finlay, C. Kloss","doi":"10.1093/gji/ggae008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Satellite observations of the geomagnetic field contain signals generated in Earth’s interior by electrical currents in the core and by magnetized rocks in the lithosphere. At short wavelengths the lithospheric signal dominates, obscuring the signal from the core. Here we present details of a method to co-estimate separate models for the core and lithospheric fields, which are allowed to overlap in spherical harmonic degree, that makes use of prior information to aid the separation. Using a maximum entropy method we estimate probabilistic models for the time-dependent core field and the static lithospheric field that satisfy constraints provided by satellite observations while being consistent with prior knowledge of the spatial covariance and expected magnitude of each field at its source surface. For the core field, we find that between spherical harmonic degree 13 and 22 power adds coherently to the established structures, and present a synthetic test that illustrates the aspects of the small scale core field that can reliably be retrieved. For the large scale lithospheric field we also find encouraging results, with the strongest signatures below spherical harmonic degree 13 occurring at locations of known prominent lithospheric field anomalies in north-Eastern Europe, Australia and eastern North America. Although the amplitudes of the small scale core field and large scale lithospheric field are underestimated we find no evidence that obvious artefacts are introduced. Compared with conventional maps of the core-mantle boundary field our results suggest more localized normal flux concentrations close to the tangent cylinder, and that low latitude flux concentrations occur in pairs of opposite polarity. Future improvements in the recovery of the small scale core field and large scale lithospheric field will depend on whether more detailed prior information can be reliably extracted from core dynamo and lithospheric magnetisation simulations.","PeriodicalId":502458,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Journal International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-estimation of core and lithospheric magnetic fields by a maximum entropy method\",\"authors\":\"Mikkel Otzen, Christopher C Finlay, C. Kloss\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gji/ggae008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Satellite observations of the geomagnetic field contain signals generated in Earth’s interior by electrical currents in the core and by magnetized rocks in the lithosphere. At short wavelengths the lithospheric signal dominates, obscuring the signal from the core. Here we present details of a method to co-estimate separate models for the core and lithospheric fields, which are allowed to overlap in spherical harmonic degree, that makes use of prior information to aid the separation. Using a maximum entropy method we estimate probabilistic models for the time-dependent core field and the static lithospheric field that satisfy constraints provided by satellite observations while being consistent with prior knowledge of the spatial covariance and expected magnitude of each field at its source surface. For the core field, we find that between spherical harmonic degree 13 and 22 power adds coherently to the established structures, and present a synthetic test that illustrates the aspects of the small scale core field that can reliably be retrieved. For the large scale lithospheric field we also find encouraging results, with the strongest signatures below spherical harmonic degree 13 occurring at locations of known prominent lithospheric field anomalies in north-Eastern Europe, Australia and eastern North America. Although the amplitudes of the small scale core field and large scale lithospheric field are underestimated we find no evidence that obvious artefacts are introduced. Compared with conventional maps of the core-mantle boundary field our results suggest more localized normal flux concentrations close to the tangent cylinder, and that low latitude flux concentrations occur in pairs of opposite polarity. Future improvements in the recovery of the small scale core field and large scale lithospheric field will depend on whether more detailed prior information can be reliably extracted from core dynamo and lithospheric magnetisation simulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Journal International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Journal International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Journal International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫星观测到的地磁场包含地核电流和岩石圈磁化岩石在地球内部产生的信号。在短波长下,岩石圈信号占主导地位,掩盖了来自地核的信号。在这里,我们详细介绍了一种共同估算地核场和岩石圈场单独模型的方法,这种方法利用先验信息来帮助分离,允许地核场和岩石圈场在球谐波程度上重叠。利用最大熵方法,我们估算了随时间变化的核心场和静态岩石圈场的概率模型,这些模型既能满足卫星观测提供的约束条件,又与每个场在其源面的空间协方差和预期幅度的先验知识相一致。对于核心场,我们发现介于 13 和 22 度之间的球谐波功率与已建立的结构相一致,并提出了一个合成测试,说明可以可靠地检索到小尺度核心场的各个方面。对于大尺度岩石圈场,我们也发现了令人鼓舞的结果,在欧洲东北部、澳大利亚和北美东部已知突出岩石圈场异常的位置,出现了低于球谐波 13 度的最强特征。虽然小尺度岩心场和大尺度岩石圈场的振幅被低估,但我们没有发现明显的伪影。与传统的地核-地幔边界场图相比,我们的研究结果表明,在切线圆柱体附近有更多局部法向通量聚集,低纬度通量聚集成对出现,极性相反。未来对小尺度地核场和大尺度岩石圈场恢复的改进将取决于能否从地核动力和岩石圈磁化模拟中可靠地提取更详细的先验信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Co-estimation of core and lithospheric magnetic fields by a maximum entropy method
Satellite observations of the geomagnetic field contain signals generated in Earth’s interior by electrical currents in the core and by magnetized rocks in the lithosphere. At short wavelengths the lithospheric signal dominates, obscuring the signal from the core. Here we present details of a method to co-estimate separate models for the core and lithospheric fields, which are allowed to overlap in spherical harmonic degree, that makes use of prior information to aid the separation. Using a maximum entropy method we estimate probabilistic models for the time-dependent core field and the static lithospheric field that satisfy constraints provided by satellite observations while being consistent with prior knowledge of the spatial covariance and expected magnitude of each field at its source surface. For the core field, we find that between spherical harmonic degree 13 and 22 power adds coherently to the established structures, and present a synthetic test that illustrates the aspects of the small scale core field that can reliably be retrieved. For the large scale lithospheric field we also find encouraging results, with the strongest signatures below spherical harmonic degree 13 occurring at locations of known prominent lithospheric field anomalies in north-Eastern Europe, Australia and eastern North America. Although the amplitudes of the small scale core field and large scale lithospheric field are underestimated we find no evidence that obvious artefacts are introduced. Compared with conventional maps of the core-mantle boundary field our results suggest more localized normal flux concentrations close to the tangent cylinder, and that low latitude flux concentrations occur in pairs of opposite polarity. Future improvements in the recovery of the small scale core field and large scale lithospheric field will depend on whether more detailed prior information can be reliably extracted from core dynamo and lithospheric magnetisation simulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Waveform modeling of hydroacoustic teleseismic earthquake records from autonomous Mermaid floats Real-Time Dual-Parameter Full-Waveform Inversion of GPR Data Based on Robust Deep Learning Graph-learning approach to combine multiresolution seismic velocity models An iterative weighted least square fitting method for crustal anisotropy using receiver functions Electrical conductivity of the suboceanic upper mantle constrained by satellite-derived tidal magnetic fields: 3-D inversion, validation and interpretation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1