良好控制流的逻辑本质

IF 2.2 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1145/3632862
Amin Timany, Armaël Guéneau, Lars Birkedal
{"title":"良好控制流的逻辑本质","authors":"Amin Timany, Armaël Guéneau, Lars Birkedal","doi":"10.1145/3632862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A program is said to be well-bracketed if every called function must return before its caller can resume execution. This is often the case. Well-bracketedness has been captured semantically as a condition on strategies in fully abstract games models and multiple prior works have studied well-bracketedness by showing correctness/security properties of programs where such properties depend on the well-bracketed nature of control flow. The latter category of prior works have all used involved relational models with explicit state-transition systems capturing the relevant parts of the control flow of the program. In this paper we present the first Hoare-style program logic based on separation logic for reasoning about well-bracketedness and use it to show correctness of well-bracketed programs both directly and also through defining unary and binary logical relations models based on this program logic. All results presented in this paper are formalized on top of the Iris framework and mechanized in the Coq proof assistant.","PeriodicalId":20697,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Logical Essence of Well-Bracketed Control Flow\",\"authors\":\"Amin Timany, Armaël Guéneau, Lars Birkedal\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3632862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A program is said to be well-bracketed if every called function must return before its caller can resume execution. This is often the case. Well-bracketedness has been captured semantically as a condition on strategies in fully abstract games models and multiple prior works have studied well-bracketedness by showing correctness/security properties of programs where such properties depend on the well-bracketed nature of control flow. The latter category of prior works have all used involved relational models with explicit state-transition systems capturing the relevant parts of the control flow of the program. In this paper we present the first Hoare-style program logic based on separation logic for reasoning about well-bracketedness and use it to show correctness of well-bracketed programs both directly and also through defining unary and binary logical relations models based on this program logic. All results presented in this paper are formalized on top of the Iris framework and mechanized in the Coq proof assistant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3632862\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3632862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果每个被调用函数都必须在其调用者继续执行之前返回,那么这个程序就被认为是良好的。这种情况经常发生。完全抽象博弈模型中的策略条件从语义上捕捉到了良好包络性,先前有许多著作通过展示程序的正确性/安全性属性来研究良好包络性,这些属性取决于控制流的良好包络性。后一类先行研究都使用了涉及关系模型的显式状态转换系统来捕捉程序控制流的相关部分。在本文中,我们首次提出了基于分离逻辑的胡尔式程序逻辑,用于推理井式封装,并直接以及通过定义基于该程序逻辑的一元和二元逻辑关系模型来证明井式封装程序的正确性。本文介绍的所有结果都是在 Iris 框架之上形式化的,并在 Coq 证明助手中机械化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Logical Essence of Well-Bracketed Control Flow
A program is said to be well-bracketed if every called function must return before its caller can resume execution. This is often the case. Well-bracketedness has been captured semantically as a condition on strategies in fully abstract games models and multiple prior works have studied well-bracketedness by showing correctness/security properties of programs where such properties depend on the well-bracketed nature of control flow. The latter category of prior works have all used involved relational models with explicit state-transition systems capturing the relevant parts of the control flow of the program. In this paper we present the first Hoare-style program logic based on separation logic for reasoning about well-bracketedness and use it to show correctness of well-bracketed programs both directly and also through defining unary and binary logical relations models based on this program logic. All results presented in this paper are formalized on top of the Iris framework and mechanized in the Coq proof assistant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
22.20%
发文量
192
期刊最新文献
ReLU Hull Approximation An Axiomatic Basis for Computer Programming on the Relaxed Arm-A Architecture: The AxSL Logic The Essence of Generalized Algebraic Data Types Explicit Effects and Effect Constraints in ReML Indexed Types for a Statically Safe WebAssembly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1