密度波动造成的微波束散射对托卡马克中电子-回旋加速器功率沉积曲线的影响

J. Cazabonne, S. Coda, Joan Decker, O. Krutkin, Umesh Kumar, Yves Savoye-Peysson
{"title":"密度波动造成的微波束散射对托卡马克中电子-回旋加速器功率沉积曲线的影响","authors":"J. Cazabonne, S. Coda, Joan Decker, O. Krutkin, Umesh Kumar, Yves Savoye-Peysson","doi":"10.1088/1741-4326/ad1af6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Electron-Cyclotron waves are a tool commonly used in tokamaks, in particular to drive current. Their ability to drive current in a very localized manner renders them an optimal tool for MHD mode mitigation. However, such applications require high accuracy and good control of the power deposition location to efficiently target the magnetic islands. It has been indirectly observed that the suprathermal electron distribution, resulting from the wave absorption, is broader than what is expected from experimentally-constrained forward drift-kinetic modeling. The present paper explores the possibility that beam scattering through the turbulent edge of the plasma may explain this observed discrepancy. In particular, full-wave studies exhibit three beam broadening regimes, from superdiffusive to diffusive, with an intermediate regime characterized by a Lorentzian beam profile with a slightly increased full-width at half maximum with respect to the quiet plasma case. In the Tokamak à Configuration Variable, dedicated plasma scenarios have been developed to test this hypothesis. A realistic worst-case fluctuation scenario falls into this intermediate beam broadening regime. By comparing the experimental hard X-ray emission from suprathermal electron Bremmstrahlung with the emission calculated by coupling a full-wave model to a Fokker-Planck solver, it is shown that that, in the tested cases, the beam broadening is not sufficient to explain the aforementioned discrepancy between simulation and experiment and that another mechanism must play the main role in broadening the suprathermal electron distribution.","PeriodicalId":503481,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Fusion","volume":"43 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of microwave beam scattering by density fluctuations on the Electron-Cyclotron power deposition profile in tokamaks\",\"authors\":\"J. Cazabonne, S. Coda, Joan Decker, O. Krutkin, Umesh Kumar, Yves Savoye-Peysson\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1741-4326/ad1af6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Electron-Cyclotron waves are a tool commonly used in tokamaks, in particular to drive current. Their ability to drive current in a very localized manner renders them an optimal tool for MHD mode mitigation. However, such applications require high accuracy and good control of the power deposition location to efficiently target the magnetic islands. It has been indirectly observed that the suprathermal electron distribution, resulting from the wave absorption, is broader than what is expected from experimentally-constrained forward drift-kinetic modeling. The present paper explores the possibility that beam scattering through the turbulent edge of the plasma may explain this observed discrepancy. In particular, full-wave studies exhibit three beam broadening regimes, from superdiffusive to diffusive, with an intermediate regime characterized by a Lorentzian beam profile with a slightly increased full-width at half maximum with respect to the quiet plasma case. In the Tokamak à Configuration Variable, dedicated plasma scenarios have been developed to test this hypothesis. A realistic worst-case fluctuation scenario falls into this intermediate beam broadening regime. By comparing the experimental hard X-ray emission from suprathermal electron Bremmstrahlung with the emission calculated by coupling a full-wave model to a Fokker-Planck solver, it is shown that that, in the tested cases, the beam broadening is not sufficient to explain the aforementioned discrepancy between simulation and experiment and that another mechanism must play the main role in broadening the suprathermal electron distribution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Fusion\",\"volume\":\"43 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Fusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad1af6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Fusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad1af6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子-回旋加速器波是托卡马克中常用的一种工具,特别是用于驱动电流。电子-环电子波能够以非常局部的方式驱动电流,因此是减缓 MHD 模式的最佳工具。然而,这种应用需要高精度和良好的功率沉积位置控制,以便有效地瞄准磁岛。据间接观察,波吸收产生的过热电子分布比实验约束的前向漂移动力学建模所预期的要宽。本文探讨了通过等离子体湍流边缘的光束散射可能解释这种观察到的差异的可能性。特别是,全波研究显示了从超扩散到扩散的三种光束展宽机制,中间机制的特征是洛伦兹光束轮廓,与静态等离子体情况相比,半最大全宽略有增加。在托卡马克 à 配置变量中,开发了专门的等离子体方案来测试这一假设。现实中最糟糕的波动情况就属于这种中间光束展宽机制。通过比较实验中超热电子布赖姆斯特拉发射的硬 X 射线辐射和全波模型与福克-普朗克求解器耦合计算的辐射,结果表明,在测试的情况下,光束增宽不足以解释上述模拟与实验之间的差异,另一种机制必须在增宽超热电子分布方面发挥主要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of microwave beam scattering by density fluctuations on the Electron-Cyclotron power deposition profile in tokamaks
Electron-Cyclotron waves are a tool commonly used in tokamaks, in particular to drive current. Their ability to drive current in a very localized manner renders them an optimal tool for MHD mode mitigation. However, such applications require high accuracy and good control of the power deposition location to efficiently target the magnetic islands. It has been indirectly observed that the suprathermal electron distribution, resulting from the wave absorption, is broader than what is expected from experimentally-constrained forward drift-kinetic modeling. The present paper explores the possibility that beam scattering through the turbulent edge of the plasma may explain this observed discrepancy. In particular, full-wave studies exhibit three beam broadening regimes, from superdiffusive to diffusive, with an intermediate regime characterized by a Lorentzian beam profile with a slightly increased full-width at half maximum with respect to the quiet plasma case. In the Tokamak à Configuration Variable, dedicated plasma scenarios have been developed to test this hypothesis. A realistic worst-case fluctuation scenario falls into this intermediate beam broadening regime. By comparing the experimental hard X-ray emission from suprathermal electron Bremmstrahlung with the emission calculated by coupling a full-wave model to a Fokker-Planck solver, it is shown that that, in the tested cases, the beam broadening is not sufficient to explain the aforementioned discrepancy between simulation and experiment and that another mechanism must play the main role in broadening the suprathermal electron distribution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Decoupling beam power and beam energy on ASDEX Upgrade NBI with an in-situ variable extraction gap system Dynamic control of divertor heat flux during n = 4 RMP ELM suppression by small variation of q95 in EAST Recent progress in improvement in ion cyclotron range of frequencies coupling and power absorption with new antennas of Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) Resistive wall mode and fishbone mode in ITER steady state scenario: roles of fusion-born alphas and plasma flow First SOLPS-ITER predictions of the impact of cross-field drifts on divertor and scrape-off layer conditions in double-null configuration of STEP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1