经验证的高效薄层色谱密度测量法,用于定量分析恩布利卡、肉桂和洋甘菊提取物复方制剂中的没食子酸、槲皮素和熊果酸含量

K. Patel, Gandhi Vasima, P. Shah, V. Thakkar
{"title":"经验证的高效薄层色谱密度测量法,用于定量分析恩布利卡、肉桂和洋甘菊提取物复方制剂中的没食子酸、槲皮素和熊果酸含量","authors":"K. Patel, Gandhi Vasima, P. Shah, V. Thakkar","doi":"10.1002/sscp.202300083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A quantitative high‐performance thin‐layer chromatography method has been developed for the estimation of three markers gallic acid, quercetin, and ursolic acid in the extracts and combined formulation of Emblica officinalis, Punica granatum Linn, and Ocimum sanctum Linn extracts. Chromatographic development was performed using precoated silica gel 60 F254 TLC plate and final optimized mobile phase as toluene:ethyl acetate:formic acid (4.5:3:0.2 v/v/v), resulting in optimum resolution with Rf of 0.29, 0.51, and 0.78 for gallic acid, quercetin, and ursolic acid, respectively. Gallic acid and quercetin were detected at 258 nm and ursolic acid at 529 nm after derivatization. All markers showed a good correlation coefficient of 0.9950 for gallic acid, 0.9953 for quercetin, and 0.9945 for ursolic acid. The accuracy and precision measured were less than 2% relative standard deviation for all markers. The mean percent recovery found for gallic acid, quercetin, and ursolic acid were within acceptable limits in formulation indicating that the excipients present have no interference. The proposed method was found to be specific, accurate, linear, precise, and robust, and can be applicable for the simultaneous estimation of gallic acid, quercetin, and ursolic acid for the analysis of individual plant extracts and herbal formulation.","PeriodicalId":508518,"journal":{"name":"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validated high‐performance thin‐layer chromatographic densitometric method for quantification of gallic acid, quercetin, and ursolic acid in the combined formulation of Emblica officinalis, Punica granatum Linn, and Ocimum sanctum Linn extracts\",\"authors\":\"K. Patel, Gandhi Vasima, P. Shah, V. Thakkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sscp.202300083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A quantitative high‐performance thin‐layer chromatography method has been developed for the estimation of three markers gallic acid, quercetin, and ursolic acid in the extracts and combined formulation of Emblica officinalis, Punica granatum Linn, and Ocimum sanctum Linn extracts. Chromatographic development was performed using precoated silica gel 60 F254 TLC plate and final optimized mobile phase as toluene:ethyl acetate:formic acid (4.5:3:0.2 v/v/v), resulting in optimum resolution with Rf of 0.29, 0.51, and 0.78 for gallic acid, quercetin, and ursolic acid, respectively. Gallic acid and quercetin were detected at 258 nm and ursolic acid at 529 nm after derivatization. All markers showed a good correlation coefficient of 0.9950 for gallic acid, 0.9953 for quercetin, and 0.9945 for ursolic acid. The accuracy and precision measured were less than 2% relative standard deviation for all markers. The mean percent recovery found for gallic acid, quercetin, and ursolic acid were within acceptable limits in formulation indicating that the excipients present have no interference. The proposed method was found to be specific, accurate, linear, precise, and robust, and can be applicable for the simultaneous estimation of gallic acid, quercetin, and ursolic acid for the analysis of individual plant extracts and herbal formulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sscp.202300083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sscp.202300083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建立了一种高效薄层色谱定量分析方法,用于估测大蒜提取物和复方制剂中没食子酸、槲皮素和熊果酸的含量。使用预涂硅胶 60 F254 TLC 板和最终优化的甲苯:乙酸乙酯:甲酸(4.5:3:0.2 v/v/v)流动相进行色谱分析,结果表明没食子酸、槲皮素和熊果酸的最佳分辨率分别为 0.29、0.51 和 0.78。衍生后,没食子酸和槲皮素的检测波长为 258 nm,熊果酸的检测波长为 529 nm。所有标记物的相关系数良好,没食子酸为 0.9950,槲皮素为 0.9953,熊果酸为 0.9945。所有标记物的准确度和精密度相对标准偏差均小于 2%。配方中没食子酸、槲皮素和熊果酸的平均回收率在可接受范围内,表明辅料没有干扰。该方法特异、准确、线性、精确、稳健,可用于同时测定没食子酸、槲皮素和熊果酸,用于分析单个植物提取物和中草药配方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validated high‐performance thin‐layer chromatographic densitometric method for quantification of gallic acid, quercetin, and ursolic acid in the combined formulation of Emblica officinalis, Punica granatum Linn, and Ocimum sanctum Linn extracts
A quantitative high‐performance thin‐layer chromatography method has been developed for the estimation of three markers gallic acid, quercetin, and ursolic acid in the extracts and combined formulation of Emblica officinalis, Punica granatum Linn, and Ocimum sanctum Linn extracts. Chromatographic development was performed using precoated silica gel 60 F254 TLC plate and final optimized mobile phase as toluene:ethyl acetate:formic acid (4.5:3:0.2 v/v/v), resulting in optimum resolution with Rf of 0.29, 0.51, and 0.78 for gallic acid, quercetin, and ursolic acid, respectively. Gallic acid and quercetin were detected at 258 nm and ursolic acid at 529 nm after derivatization. All markers showed a good correlation coefficient of 0.9950 for gallic acid, 0.9953 for quercetin, and 0.9945 for ursolic acid. The accuracy and precision measured were less than 2% relative standard deviation for all markers. The mean percent recovery found for gallic acid, quercetin, and ursolic acid were within acceptable limits in formulation indicating that the excipients present have no interference. The proposed method was found to be specific, accurate, linear, precise, and robust, and can be applicable for the simultaneous estimation of gallic acid, quercetin, and ursolic acid for the analysis of individual plant extracts and herbal formulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sustainable and Stability Indicating Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Method for the Quantitation of Delafloxacin in Pharmaceutical Formulations Direct Quantitation of Poloxamer 188 in Adeno‐Associated Virus Products Using Reversed‐Phase Chromatography With Charged Aerosol Detection Comprehensive Identification of the Chemical Substances in Effective Component Groups of Polygalae Radix Based on Targeted Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis Strategy Quality Comparison Between Two Species of Artemisiae Scopariae Herba Through Qualitative Analysis of HPLC Fingerprint and Quantitative Analysis of 12 Representative Constituents Liquid chromatography and liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry studies for the identification and characterization of degradation products of lobeglitazone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1