治疗输尿管支架相关症状的药理作用比较:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析

Andi As'ad Mubarak, Muhammad Ainul Mahfuz, Abdul Aziz, Muhammad Sopiyudin Dahlan
{"title":"治疗输尿管支架相关症状的药理作用比较:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Andi As'ad Mubarak, Muhammad Ainul Mahfuz, Abdul Aziz, Muhammad Sopiyudin Dahlan","doi":"10.32421/juri.v31i1.840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We wish to update existing meta-analyses to assess the effectiveness of pharmacological agents against ureteral stent-related symptoms with better design of RCTs, as well as more valid and reliable measurement methods. Material & Methods: Relevant published articles up to February 2022 were obtained from PubMed, CENTRAL, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and DOAJ. All single-blind or double-blind RCTs with various comparisons using pharmacological agents and/or placebo in patients with ureteral stent-related symptoms, with outcome assessment using USSQ at week 1 and week 4 during stent placement was included in the study. Statistical parameter Mean Difference (MD) with 95% CI was used to measure effect size. The p value less than 0.05 indicates statistical significance. Results: Alpha blockers (2 studies, 85 samples) significantly reduced fourth week UIS compared to placebo (MD: – 5.46, 95% CI: – 7.47 to -3.46, I2 = 0%, P = < 0.001), and alpha blockers (2 studies, 42 samples) significantly reduced first week SIS compared to combination therapy (MD: – 0.82, 95% CI: – 1.56 to – 0.08, I2 = 0%, P = 0.03). The results of the meta-analysis of USSQ scores in other domains have no significant differences. Conclusion: Alpha blockers were better than placebo in reducing UIS due to ureteral stent in the fourth week of stent placement, and better than combination therapy in reducing SIS due to ureteral stent in the first-week post stenting. However, more RCTs are needed with larger samples and better designs to reach valid conclusions. \nKeywords: Stents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Single-Blind Method.","PeriodicalId":13565,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF PHARMACOLOGY AGENTS EFFECT IN TREATING URETERAL STENT RELATED SYMPTOMS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW & META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL¬\",\"authors\":\"Andi As'ad Mubarak, Muhammad Ainul Mahfuz, Abdul Aziz, Muhammad Sopiyudin Dahlan\",\"doi\":\"10.32421/juri.v31i1.840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: We wish to update existing meta-analyses to assess the effectiveness of pharmacological agents against ureteral stent-related symptoms with better design of RCTs, as well as more valid and reliable measurement methods. Material & Methods: Relevant published articles up to February 2022 were obtained from PubMed, CENTRAL, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and DOAJ. All single-blind or double-blind RCTs with various comparisons using pharmacological agents and/or placebo in patients with ureteral stent-related symptoms, with outcome assessment using USSQ at week 1 and week 4 during stent placement was included in the study. Statistical parameter Mean Difference (MD) with 95% CI was used to measure effect size. The p value less than 0.05 indicates statistical significance. Results: Alpha blockers (2 studies, 85 samples) significantly reduced fourth week UIS compared to placebo (MD: – 5.46, 95% CI: – 7.47 to -3.46, I2 = 0%, P = < 0.001), and alpha blockers (2 studies, 42 samples) significantly reduced first week SIS compared to combination therapy (MD: – 0.82, 95% CI: – 1.56 to – 0.08, I2 = 0%, P = 0.03). The results of the meta-analysis of USSQ scores in other domains have no significant differences. Conclusion: Alpha blockers were better than placebo in reducing UIS due to ureteral stent in the fourth week of stent placement, and better than combination therapy in reducing SIS due to ureteral stent in the first-week post stenting. However, more RCTs are needed with larger samples and better designs to reach valid conclusions. \\nKeywords: Stents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Single-Blind Method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32421/juri.v31i1.840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32421/juri.v31i1.840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的我们希望更新现有的荟萃分析,通过更好的 RCT 设计以及更有效、更可靠的测量方法来评估药物对输尿管支架相关症状的疗效。材料与方法:从 PubMed、CENTRAL、Google Scholar、Science Direct 和 DOAJ 上获取截至 2022 年 2 月发表的相关文章。研究纳入了所有单盲或双盲 RCT,这些 RCT 对输尿管支架相关症状患者使用药剂和/或安慰剂进行了各种比较,并在支架置入期间的第 1 周和第 4 周使用 USSQ 进行了结果评估。统计参数平均差(MD)和 95% CI 用于衡量效应大小。P 值小于 0.05 表示具有统计学意义。研究结果与安慰剂相比,α受体阻滞剂(2 项研究,85 个样本)可显著降低第四周 UIS(MD:- 5.46,95% CI:- 7.47 至 -3.46,I2 = 0%,P = < 0.001);与联合疗法相比,α受体阻滞剂(2 项研究,42 个样本)可显著降低第一周 SIS(MD:- 0.82,95% CI:- 1.56 至 -0.08,I2 = 0%,P = 0.03)。其他领域的 USSQ 分数的荟萃分析结果没有显著差异。结论α受体阻滞剂在减少输尿管支架置入后第四周引起的UIS方面优于安慰剂,在减少支架置入后第一周输尿管支架引起的SIS方面优于联合疗法。然而,要得出有效的结论,还需要更多样本更大、设计更好的 RCT。关键词:支架支架 随机对照试验作为主题 单盲法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARISON OF PHARMACOLOGY AGENTS EFFECT IN TREATING URETERAL STENT RELATED SYMPTOMS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW & META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL¬
Objective: We wish to update existing meta-analyses to assess the effectiveness of pharmacological agents against ureteral stent-related symptoms with better design of RCTs, as well as more valid and reliable measurement methods. Material & Methods: Relevant published articles up to February 2022 were obtained from PubMed, CENTRAL, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and DOAJ. All single-blind or double-blind RCTs with various comparisons using pharmacological agents and/or placebo in patients with ureteral stent-related symptoms, with outcome assessment using USSQ at week 1 and week 4 during stent placement was included in the study. Statistical parameter Mean Difference (MD) with 95% CI was used to measure effect size. The p value less than 0.05 indicates statistical significance. Results: Alpha blockers (2 studies, 85 samples) significantly reduced fourth week UIS compared to placebo (MD: – 5.46, 95% CI: – 7.47 to -3.46, I2 = 0%, P = < 0.001), and alpha blockers (2 studies, 42 samples) significantly reduced first week SIS compared to combination therapy (MD: – 0.82, 95% CI: – 1.56 to – 0.08, I2 = 0%, P = 0.03). The results of the meta-analysis of USSQ scores in other domains have no significant differences. Conclusion: Alpha blockers were better than placebo in reducing UIS due to ureteral stent in the fourth week of stent placement, and better than combination therapy in reducing SIS due to ureteral stent in the first-week post stenting. However, more RCTs are needed with larger samples and better designs to reach valid conclusions. Keywords: Stents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Single-Blind Method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF DELAYED PRIMARY BLADDER EXSTROPHY RECONSTRUCTION IN FEMALE PATIENT: A CASE REPORT THE EFFECT OF TAMSULOSIN 0.4 MG ADMINISTRATION TOWARDS ALTERATION OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN (PSA) LEVELS IN BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA (BPH) PATIENTS IN PADANG CITY THE INDONESIAN LINGUISTIC VALIDATION OF THE URINARY STENT RELATED HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE SINGLE SESSION BILATERAL PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (PCNL) IN HORSESHOE KIDNEY PATIENT WITH BILATERAL STAGHORN STONES: A CASE REPORT PROFILE OF NEPHROLITHIASIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH MINI-PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (MINI-PCNL): A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE IN JAMBI, INDONESIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1