ADR 与工作场所冲突--尼日利亚、英国和美国的播客分析

Chinwe Egbunike-Umegbolu
{"title":"ADR 与工作场所冲突--尼日利亚、英国和美国的播客分析","authors":"Chinwe Egbunike-Umegbolu","doi":"10.30958/ajl.10-1-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The decline of union representation and the introduction of legal incentives for workers to resolve individual employment disputes without resorting to the courts has unequivocally made Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) increasingly prominent in the British industrial relations landscape. The conciliation service offered by the Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) has been the most important sign and driver of this change. Although ADR has been encouraged in Western jurisdictions, particularly in the United Kingdom (UK) and in the United States (US), as a means to reduce time and litigation costs in relation to employment tribunal claims, the scarcity of scholarly publications, particularly on the benefits of utilising mediation or conciliation to settle workplace disputes is frankly unacceptable. On the other hand, Nigerian workers or employees are not encouraged or have little or no awareness of resolving workplace disputes or conflicts via ADR due to a lack of sensitisation in most organisations and a dearth of scholarly research on ADR to settle conflicts or workplace disputes in Nigeria, particularly with Mediation and Conciliation. This lack of awareness is a grave oversight compared to the UK. While British workers are encouraged to lodge their disputes with the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Services (ACAS) before proceeding to an employment tribunal claim, Nigerian counterparts settle via the National Industrial Court (NIC) ADR, which is not always adequate. However, some sectors in Nigeria, like the Trade Unions, are quite complex, particularly disputes emanating from the Maritime Industry, which are hardly settled via ADR, unlike their UK counterparts. Hence, the jurisdictions mentioned above have different patterns and modus operandi for resolving workplace conflicts or disputes, and these will be meticulously examined in this paper. Additionally, the paper scrutinises the reason why the minister of labour and employment has so much power accorded or bequest to him to apprehend and refer a disputed award to the National Industrial Court (NIC) ADR. The paper employs a comparative and, for the first time, podcast analysis of workplace disputes in Nigeria and Britain, focusing on the different patterns of settling Workplace Conflicts such as discrimination, bullying and harassment. The paper concludes by unequivocally highlighting the benefits of mediation and its relevance to various entities involved in Workplace conflicts or disputes. Keywords: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Workplace Conflict, Access to Labour Justice, Employment Relations, Human Resource Management, Podcast, Awareness.","PeriodicalId":184533,"journal":{"name":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW","volume":"5 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ADR and Workplace Conflict - A Podcast Analysis Nigeria, Britain and the US\",\"authors\":\"Chinwe Egbunike-Umegbolu\",\"doi\":\"10.30958/ajl.10-1-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The decline of union representation and the introduction of legal incentives for workers to resolve individual employment disputes without resorting to the courts has unequivocally made Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) increasingly prominent in the British industrial relations landscape. The conciliation service offered by the Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) has been the most important sign and driver of this change. Although ADR has been encouraged in Western jurisdictions, particularly in the United Kingdom (UK) and in the United States (US), as a means to reduce time and litigation costs in relation to employment tribunal claims, the scarcity of scholarly publications, particularly on the benefits of utilising mediation or conciliation to settle workplace disputes is frankly unacceptable. On the other hand, Nigerian workers or employees are not encouraged or have little or no awareness of resolving workplace disputes or conflicts via ADR due to a lack of sensitisation in most organisations and a dearth of scholarly research on ADR to settle conflicts or workplace disputes in Nigeria, particularly with Mediation and Conciliation. This lack of awareness is a grave oversight compared to the UK. While British workers are encouraged to lodge their disputes with the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Services (ACAS) before proceeding to an employment tribunal claim, Nigerian counterparts settle via the National Industrial Court (NIC) ADR, which is not always adequate. However, some sectors in Nigeria, like the Trade Unions, are quite complex, particularly disputes emanating from the Maritime Industry, which are hardly settled via ADR, unlike their UK counterparts. Hence, the jurisdictions mentioned above have different patterns and modus operandi for resolving workplace conflicts or disputes, and these will be meticulously examined in this paper. Additionally, the paper scrutinises the reason why the minister of labour and employment has so much power accorded or bequest to him to apprehend and refer a disputed award to the National Industrial Court (NIC) ADR. The paper employs a comparative and, for the first time, podcast analysis of workplace disputes in Nigeria and Britain, focusing on the different patterns of settling Workplace Conflicts such as discrimination, bullying and harassment. The paper concludes by unequivocally highlighting the benefits of mediation and its relevance to various entities involved in Workplace conflicts or disputes. Keywords: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Workplace Conflict, Access to Labour Justice, Employment Relations, Human Resource Management, Podcast, Awareness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW\",\"volume\":\"5 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.10-1-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.10-1-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工会代表人数的减少,以及对工人在不诉诸法庭的情况下解决个人雇佣纠纷的法律激励措施的引入,无疑使替代性纠纷解决方式(ADR)在英国劳资关系中的地位日益突出。咨询、调解与仲裁服务机构(ACAS)提供的调解服务是这一变化最重要的标志和推动力。尽管西方国家,尤其是英国和美国,一直鼓励将 ADR 作为一种手段,以减少与就业法庭索赔相关的时间和诉讼费用,但学术出版物的稀缺,尤其是关于利用调停或调解解决工作场所纠纷的益处的出版物的稀缺,坦率地说是不可接受的。另一方面,由于大多数组织缺乏宣传,对尼日利亚通过替代性争议解决机制(ADR)解决冲突或工作场所争议,特别是调停和调解的学术研究匮乏,尼日利亚的工人或雇员并不被鼓励通过替代性争议解决机制解决工作场所争议或冲突,或几乎没有这方面的意识。与英国相比,这种意识的缺乏是一种严重的疏忽。英国鼓励工人在向就业法庭提出申诉之前,先向咨询、调解和仲裁服务机构(ACAS)提出争议,而尼日利亚工人则通过国家劳资争议法庭(NIC)的 ADR 来解决争议,但这并不总是充分的。然而,尼日利亚的某些行业,如工会,相当复杂,尤其是海运业产生的纠纷,与英国的同行不同,几乎不通过 ADR 解决。因此,上述司法管辖区在解决工作场所冲突或纠纷方面有着不同的模式和工作方式,本文将对这些问题进行细致研究。此外,本文还将仔细研究为何劳动与就业部部长拥有如此大的权力,可以逮捕有争议的裁决并将其提交国家劳资争议法庭(NIC)ADR。本文首次对尼日利亚和英国的工作场所争议进行了比较和播客分析,重点关注解决歧视、欺凌和骚扰等工作场所冲突的不同模式。本文最后明确强调了调解的益处及其对涉及工作场所冲突或纠纷的各实体的意义。关键词非诉讼纠纷解决方式、工作场所冲突、诉诸劳动司法、雇佣关系、人力资源管理、播客、意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ADR and Workplace Conflict - A Podcast Analysis Nigeria, Britain and the US
The decline of union representation and the introduction of legal incentives for workers to resolve individual employment disputes without resorting to the courts has unequivocally made Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) increasingly prominent in the British industrial relations landscape. The conciliation service offered by the Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) has been the most important sign and driver of this change. Although ADR has been encouraged in Western jurisdictions, particularly in the United Kingdom (UK) and in the United States (US), as a means to reduce time and litigation costs in relation to employment tribunal claims, the scarcity of scholarly publications, particularly on the benefits of utilising mediation or conciliation to settle workplace disputes is frankly unacceptable. On the other hand, Nigerian workers or employees are not encouraged or have little or no awareness of resolving workplace disputes or conflicts via ADR due to a lack of sensitisation in most organisations and a dearth of scholarly research on ADR to settle conflicts or workplace disputes in Nigeria, particularly with Mediation and Conciliation. This lack of awareness is a grave oversight compared to the UK. While British workers are encouraged to lodge their disputes with the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Services (ACAS) before proceeding to an employment tribunal claim, Nigerian counterparts settle via the National Industrial Court (NIC) ADR, which is not always adequate. However, some sectors in Nigeria, like the Trade Unions, are quite complex, particularly disputes emanating from the Maritime Industry, which are hardly settled via ADR, unlike their UK counterparts. Hence, the jurisdictions mentioned above have different patterns and modus operandi for resolving workplace conflicts or disputes, and these will be meticulously examined in this paper. Additionally, the paper scrutinises the reason why the minister of labour and employment has so much power accorded or bequest to him to apprehend and refer a disputed award to the National Industrial Court (NIC) ADR. The paper employs a comparative and, for the first time, podcast analysis of workplace disputes in Nigeria and Britain, focusing on the different patterns of settling Workplace Conflicts such as discrimination, bullying and harassment. The paper concludes by unequivocally highlighting the benefits of mediation and its relevance to various entities involved in Workplace conflicts or disputes. Keywords: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Workplace Conflict, Access to Labour Justice, Employment Relations, Human Resource Management, Podcast, Awareness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Welfare Models and Community Enterprises: Commons and Sustainable Economy Complexity of Legal Harmonisation in Southeast Asia: A Diversity of Legal Systems & Languages Promoting Effective Refugee Protection in India: Balancing National Interests and International Obligations Legal Assessment of the Condition of Recourse to Domestic Judicial Authorities in the Judicial Procedures of the European Court of Human Rights with a view to the Case of Salahuddin Anju and others v. Turkey Network Analysis and Control System in Mega Projects: The Case of PICASP Erasmus Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1