开放人工智能聊天 GPT 的伦理困境:禁止它是对还是错?

Marzia A. Coltri
{"title":"开放人工智能聊天 GPT 的伦理困境:禁止它是对还是错?","authors":"Marzia A. Coltri","doi":"10.30958/ajl.10-1-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digitalisation and innovation in learning and research are rapidly becoming crucial drivers of society's sustainable and progressive growth. AI's technological advancements and landscapes have significant strengths, and their diversity and quality have grown in recent years. This has facilitated the impressive development of AI apps and software, such as ChatGPT, which has become popular around the world. ChatGPT is an OpenAI access to users in education to generate essays, song lyrics and stories. It is an AI language model that can understand and generate human-like responses to text inputs, making it a valuable tool for various economic and cultural applications. This study examines the ethical dilemma of banning ChatGPT. Using a range of argumentative examples, I address the concept of moral obligations to OpenAI access but also its limitations. Some possible ethical issues that may arise in the use of AI-powered chatbots include concerns about data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the potential for chatbots to replace human interaction and support. Can OpenAI's cutting-edge technology and tools truly help corporate operations and institutions, and improve decision-making? Can it also give students and researchers significant resources to help them develop their knowledge, critical thinking skills and understanding in a variety of fields? Allowing ChatGPT to operate freely could lead to unintended consequences, but it could also promote innovation in the field of AI. Ultimately, finding a balance between regulation and innovation is key to maximising the benefits of ChatGPT while minimising its potential harms. AI software has the potential to degrade and debase our ethics, which are fundamentally different from our critical thinking. Chomsky, Roberts & Watumull concern is that AI software lacks the ability to understand and apply ethical principles in the same way that humans do, which could lead to unintended consequences and ethical dilemmas. Keywords: Critical Thinking; Ethical dilemma; Right or Wrong; ChatGPT","PeriodicalId":184533,"journal":{"name":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW","volume":"83 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ethical Dilemma with Open AI ChatGPT: Is it Right or Wrong to prohibit it?\",\"authors\":\"Marzia A. Coltri\",\"doi\":\"10.30958/ajl.10-1-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digitalisation and innovation in learning and research are rapidly becoming crucial drivers of society's sustainable and progressive growth. AI's technological advancements and landscapes have significant strengths, and their diversity and quality have grown in recent years. This has facilitated the impressive development of AI apps and software, such as ChatGPT, which has become popular around the world. ChatGPT is an OpenAI access to users in education to generate essays, song lyrics and stories. It is an AI language model that can understand and generate human-like responses to text inputs, making it a valuable tool for various economic and cultural applications. This study examines the ethical dilemma of banning ChatGPT. Using a range of argumentative examples, I address the concept of moral obligations to OpenAI access but also its limitations. Some possible ethical issues that may arise in the use of AI-powered chatbots include concerns about data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the potential for chatbots to replace human interaction and support. Can OpenAI's cutting-edge technology and tools truly help corporate operations and institutions, and improve decision-making? Can it also give students and researchers significant resources to help them develop their knowledge, critical thinking skills and understanding in a variety of fields? Allowing ChatGPT to operate freely could lead to unintended consequences, but it could also promote innovation in the field of AI. Ultimately, finding a balance between regulation and innovation is key to maximising the benefits of ChatGPT while minimising its potential harms. AI software has the potential to degrade and debase our ethics, which are fundamentally different from our critical thinking. Chomsky, Roberts & Watumull concern is that AI software lacks the ability to understand and apply ethical principles in the same way that humans do, which could lead to unintended consequences and ethical dilemmas. Keywords: Critical Thinking; Ethical dilemma; Right or Wrong; ChatGPT\",\"PeriodicalId\":184533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW\",\"volume\":\"83 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.10-1-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.10-1-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学习和研究领域的数字化和创新正迅速成为社会可持续和进步发展的重要推动力。人工智能的技术进步和发展前景具有显著优势,其多样性和质量近年来也在不断提高。这促进了人工智能应用程序和软件的迅猛发展,比如风靡全球的 ChatGPT。ChatGPT 是一种开放式人工智能(OpenAI),可供教育领域的用户生成作文、歌词和故事。它是一个人工智能语言模型,能够理解文本输入并生成类似人类的回复,是各种经济和文化应用的重要工具。本研究探讨了禁止 ChatGPT 的道德困境。通过一系列论证实例,我探讨了开放人工智能访问的道德义务概念及其局限性。使用人工智能驱动的聊天机器人可能产生的一些伦理问题包括对数据隐私、算法偏见以及聊天机器人取代人类互动和支持的可能性的担忧。OpenAI 的尖端技术和工具能否真正帮助企业运营和机构改善决策?它还能为学生和研究人员提供重要资源,帮助他们发展知识、批判性思维能力和对各领域的理解吗?允许 ChatGPT 自由运作可能会导致意想不到的后果,但也能促进人工智能领域的创新。归根结底,在监管和创新之间找到平衡点是实现 ChatGPT 利益最大化、潜在危害最小化的关键。人工智能软件有可能降低和贬损我们的道德,而我们的道德与我们的批判性思维有着本质的区别。乔姆斯基、罗伯茨和瓦图穆尔担心的是,人工智能软件缺乏像人类一样理解和应用伦理原则的能力,这可能会导致意想不到的后果和伦理困境。关键词批判性思维;伦理困境;对错;ChatGPT
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Ethical Dilemma with Open AI ChatGPT: Is it Right or Wrong to prohibit it?
Digitalisation and innovation in learning and research are rapidly becoming crucial drivers of society's sustainable and progressive growth. AI's technological advancements and landscapes have significant strengths, and their diversity and quality have grown in recent years. This has facilitated the impressive development of AI apps and software, such as ChatGPT, which has become popular around the world. ChatGPT is an OpenAI access to users in education to generate essays, song lyrics and stories. It is an AI language model that can understand and generate human-like responses to text inputs, making it a valuable tool for various economic and cultural applications. This study examines the ethical dilemma of banning ChatGPT. Using a range of argumentative examples, I address the concept of moral obligations to OpenAI access but also its limitations. Some possible ethical issues that may arise in the use of AI-powered chatbots include concerns about data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the potential for chatbots to replace human interaction and support. Can OpenAI's cutting-edge technology and tools truly help corporate operations and institutions, and improve decision-making? Can it also give students and researchers significant resources to help them develop their knowledge, critical thinking skills and understanding in a variety of fields? Allowing ChatGPT to operate freely could lead to unintended consequences, but it could also promote innovation in the field of AI. Ultimately, finding a balance between regulation and innovation is key to maximising the benefits of ChatGPT while minimising its potential harms. AI software has the potential to degrade and debase our ethics, which are fundamentally different from our critical thinking. Chomsky, Roberts & Watumull concern is that AI software lacks the ability to understand and apply ethical principles in the same way that humans do, which could lead to unintended consequences and ethical dilemmas. Keywords: Critical Thinking; Ethical dilemma; Right or Wrong; ChatGPT
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Welfare Models and Community Enterprises: Commons and Sustainable Economy Complexity of Legal Harmonisation in Southeast Asia: A Diversity of Legal Systems & Languages Promoting Effective Refugee Protection in India: Balancing National Interests and International Obligations Legal Assessment of the Condition of Recourse to Domestic Judicial Authorities in the Judicial Procedures of the European Court of Human Rights with a view to the Case of Salahuddin Anju and others v. Turkey Network Analysis and Control System in Mega Projects: The Case of PICASP Erasmus Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1