使用综合指标法验证英国退伍军人的复杂需求指标

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health in Practice Pub Date : 2024-01-05 DOI:10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100464
Anastasia Fadeeva , Marco Tomietto , Ajay Tiwari , Emily Mann , Giuseppe Serra , Matthew D. Kiernan
{"title":"使用综合指标法验证英国退伍军人的复杂需求指标","authors":"Anastasia Fadeeva ,&nbsp;Marco Tomietto ,&nbsp;Ajay Tiwari ,&nbsp;Emily Mann ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Serra ,&nbsp;Matthew D. Kiernan","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To construct an indicator for assessing the complexity of UK veterans’ needs.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Cross-sectional, secondary analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study applied principal component (PCA) analysis as the method to determine the weights of different needs based on their interactions with each other, the effectiveness of the model was evaluated using bootstrapping. The dataset on UK veterans’ support provided by the “Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Associations” (SSAFA) (N = 35,208) was considered. The grant applications for different categories of support were used as indicators of different needs. The dimensions of breadth (number of different needs) and depth (number of grant applications to address the need) were incorporated in the assessment of complexity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The complex needs indicator for the current sample was validated. The majority of cases had a complexity score of 1 or less.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The research suggested and tested an assessment method for the complexity of veterans’ needs, that may be positively associated with higher risk of adverse health outcomes. This indicator can be used by decision-makers for risk stratification of the veteran population, thus supporting the allocation of resources in a more effective way.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100464"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000016/pdfft?md5=7464880844de8706e43fc04edfd13e5b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666535224000016-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a complex needs indicator for veterans in the UK using a composite indicators’ method\",\"authors\":\"Anastasia Fadeeva ,&nbsp;Marco Tomietto ,&nbsp;Ajay Tiwari ,&nbsp;Emily Mann ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Serra ,&nbsp;Matthew D. Kiernan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To construct an indicator for assessing the complexity of UK veterans’ needs.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Cross-sectional, secondary analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study applied principal component (PCA) analysis as the method to determine the weights of different needs based on their interactions with each other, the effectiveness of the model was evaluated using bootstrapping. The dataset on UK veterans’ support provided by the “Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Associations” (SSAFA) (N = 35,208) was considered. The grant applications for different categories of support were used as indicators of different needs. The dimensions of breadth (number of different needs) and depth (number of grant applications to address the need) were incorporated in the assessment of complexity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The complex needs indicator for the current sample was validated. The majority of cases had a complexity score of 1 or less.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The research suggested and tested an assessment method for the complexity of veterans’ needs, that may be positively associated with higher risk of adverse health outcomes. This indicator can be used by decision-makers for risk stratification of the veteran population, thus supporting the allocation of resources in a more effective way.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000016/pdfft?md5=7464880844de8706e43fc04edfd13e5b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666535224000016-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计横断面、二次分析方法研究采用主成分(PCA)分析法,根据不同需求之间的相互作用确定其权重,并使用引导法评估模型的有效性。研究考虑了 "士兵、水手、飞行员和家庭协会"(SSAFA)提供的英国退伍军人支持数据集(N = 35,208)。不同类别支持的补助金申请被用作不同需求的指标。在评估复杂性时,纳入了广度(不同需求的数量)和深度(满足需求的补助金申请数量)两个维度。结论这项研究提出并测试了一种评估退伍军人需求复杂性的方法,该方法可能与较高的不良健康后果风险正相关。决策者可利用这一指标对退伍军人进行风险分层,从而更有效地分配资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a complex needs indicator for veterans in the UK using a composite indicators’ method

Objective

To construct an indicator for assessing the complexity of UK veterans’ needs.

Study design

Cross-sectional, secondary analysis.

Methods

The study applied principal component (PCA) analysis as the method to determine the weights of different needs based on their interactions with each other, the effectiveness of the model was evaluated using bootstrapping. The dataset on UK veterans’ support provided by the “Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Associations” (SSAFA) (N = 35,208) was considered. The grant applications for different categories of support were used as indicators of different needs. The dimensions of breadth (number of different needs) and depth (number of grant applications to address the need) were incorporated in the assessment of complexity.

Results

The complex needs indicator for the current sample was validated. The majority of cases had a complexity score of 1 or less.

Conclusions

The research suggested and tested an assessment method for the complexity of veterans’ needs, that may be positively associated with higher risk of adverse health outcomes. This indicator can be used by decision-makers for risk stratification of the veteran population, thus supporting the allocation of resources in a more effective way.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the dispensing of systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) in Ireland: A population based study Association between child marriage and high blood glucose level in women: A birth cohort analysis Reaching national Covid-19 vaccination targets whilst decreasing inequalities in vaccine uptake: Public health teams' challenges in supporting disadvantaged populations Syndemic geographic patterns of cancer risk in a health-deprived area of England Young, deprived women are more at risk of testing positive for Chlamydia trachomatis: Results from a cross-sectional multicentre study in French health examination centres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1