单侧双腹腔镜(UBE)经腰椎穿孔椎间融合术的现状与未来综述

Pang Hung Wu , Rohit Akshay Kavishwar , Hyeun Sung Kim
{"title":"单侧双腹腔镜(UBE)经腰椎穿孔椎间融合术的现状与未来综述","authors":"Pang Hung Wu ,&nbsp;Rohit Akshay Kavishwar ,&nbsp;Hyeun Sung Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.semss.2024.101084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>With the ongoing development of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) spine surgery, it has become standard of care at many centers across the globe for lumbar decompressions and discectomies<span><span> due to minimal muscle damage, minimal postoperative back pain and early recovery. In UBE, the separation of viewing portal and working portal allows greater freedom of movement for the surgical instruments as the camera and instruments move independently providing unrestricted vision. Moreover, the continuous </span>irrigation fluid pressure decreases bleeding and helps to irrigate out the bone debris. Hence, UBE spine surgery has become quite popular and has expanded its indications to lumbar </span></span>spinal fusion. The adoption of UBE for conventional spine surgeons into their routine practice is relatively easier than uniportal </span>endoscopy<span> because of use of standard arthroscopic lenses, familiar view of anatomy<span>, and use of conventional open spinal instruments. In this article, we review the current literature and discuss the indications, contraindications, clinical outcomes, complications and compare it with existing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":39884,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Spine Surgery","volume":"36 1","pages":"Article 101084"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A narrative review of current and future of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion\",\"authors\":\"Pang Hung Wu ,&nbsp;Rohit Akshay Kavishwar ,&nbsp;Hyeun Sung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semss.2024.101084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>With the ongoing development of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) spine surgery, it has become standard of care at many centers across the globe for lumbar decompressions and discectomies<span><span> due to minimal muscle damage, minimal postoperative back pain and early recovery. In UBE, the separation of viewing portal and working portal allows greater freedom of movement for the surgical instruments as the camera and instruments move independently providing unrestricted vision. Moreover, the continuous </span>irrigation fluid pressure decreases bleeding and helps to irrigate out the bone debris. Hence, UBE spine surgery has become quite popular and has expanded its indications to lumbar </span></span>spinal fusion. The adoption of UBE for conventional spine surgeons into their routine practice is relatively easier than uniportal </span>endoscopy<span> because of use of standard arthroscopic lenses, familiar view of anatomy<span>, and use of conventional open spinal instruments. In this article, we review the current literature and discuss the indications, contraindications, clinical outcomes, complications and compare it with existing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101084\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040738324000078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040738324000078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着单侧双入口内窥镜(UBE)脊柱手术的不断发展,它已成为全球许多中心腰椎减压和椎间盘切除术的标准护理方法,因为它对肌肉的损伤最小,术后背痛最小,恢复也早。在 UBE 中,观察孔和工作孔的分离为手术器械的移动提供了更大的自由度,因为摄像头和器械可以独立移动,从而提供无限制的视野。此外,持续的冲洗液压力可减少出血,并有助于冲洗出骨碎片。因此,UBE 脊柱手术已相当普及,其适应症已扩展到腰椎融合术。对于传统脊柱外科医生来说,由于使用标准关节镜镜头、熟悉解剖结构和使用传统开放式脊柱器械,UBE 比单孔内镜更容易应用于常规实践。本文回顾了现有文献,讨论了 UBE 的适应症、禁忌症、临床效果、并发症,并将其与现有的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体融合术进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A narrative review of current and future of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

With the ongoing development of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) spine surgery, it has become standard of care at many centers across the globe for lumbar decompressions and discectomies due to minimal muscle damage, minimal postoperative back pain and early recovery. In UBE, the separation of viewing portal and working portal allows greater freedom of movement for the surgical instruments as the camera and instruments move independently providing unrestricted vision. Moreover, the continuous irrigation fluid pressure decreases bleeding and helps to irrigate out the bone debris. Hence, UBE spine surgery has become quite popular and has expanded its indications to lumbar spinal fusion. The adoption of UBE for conventional spine surgeons into their routine practice is relatively easier than uniportal endoscopy because of use of standard arthroscopic lenses, familiar view of anatomy, and use of conventional open spinal instruments. In this article, we review the current literature and discuss the indications, contraindications, clinical outcomes, complications and compare it with existing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Spine Surgery
Seminars in Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
2 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Spine Surgery is a continuing source of current, clinical information for practicing surgeons. Under the direction of a specially selected guest editor, each issue addresses a single topic in the management and care of patients. Topics covered in each issue include basic anatomy, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, management options and follow-up of the condition under consideration. The journal also features "Spinescope," a special section providing summaries of articles from other journals that are of relevance to the understanding of ongoing research related to the treatment of spinal disorders.
期刊最新文献
Contributors to authors Operative and non-operative options for benign primary spine tumors Wound complications following spine tumor surgery: Risk factors and prevention Update on the management of extradural primary pediatric spinal tumors Interventional radiology procedures for metastatic spine tumors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1