寻求重大创伤出血的相关描述:四种大出血定义的比较。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Trauma Nursing Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000762
Darcy L Day, Karen Ng, Richard Severino, Josh Ng-Kamstra
{"title":"寻求重大创伤出血的相关描述:四种大出血定义的比较。","authors":"Darcy L Day, Karen Ng, Richard Severino, Josh Ng-Kamstra","doi":"10.1097/JTN.0000000000000762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The traditional definition of massive transfusion is 10 red blood cell units transfused within 24 hr. This definition has been faulted for excluding patients who die early from exsanguination. Alternative major bleeding definitions in the trauma literature include time-based (e.g., Resuscitation Intensity) and event based (e.g., Sharpe) transfusion thresholds.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study objective was to compare four definitions of major bleeding, including a modification to the Sharpe definition, on clinically relevant processes and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of adult trauma patients admitted from the field to a Level I trauma center from 2014 to 2019. Data sources were the trauma registry, blood bank, and electronic medical records. Transfusion thresholds were defined as follows: Resuscitation Intensity-4 units of any combination of crystalloids, colloids, or blood products within the first 30 min of arrival; Sharpe-10 red blood cell units from trauma bay presentation to inpatient admission (a proxy for the interval of hemorrhage control); Modified Sharpe-10 units of any combination of blood products during the same interval. The study analysis consisted of descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort contained 187 subjects. Of 39 deaths, 28 (72%) occurred within 6 hr following arrival. Modified Sharpe captured 27 (96%) of these 28 subjects, whereas Resuscitation Intensity captured 20 (71%). Sharpe and the traditional definition each captured 22 subjects (79%). Modified Sharpe captured 17%-25% of deaths missed by the other definitions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Modified Sharpe may optimally indicate major bleeding during trauma resuscitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","volume":"31 1","pages":"7-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seeking a Relevant Description of Major Trauma Bleeding: Comparison of Four Major Bleeding Definitions.\",\"authors\":\"Darcy L Day, Karen Ng, Richard Severino, Josh Ng-Kamstra\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JTN.0000000000000762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The traditional definition of massive transfusion is 10 red blood cell units transfused within 24 hr. This definition has been faulted for excluding patients who die early from exsanguination. Alternative major bleeding definitions in the trauma literature include time-based (e.g., Resuscitation Intensity) and event based (e.g., Sharpe) transfusion thresholds.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study objective was to compare four definitions of major bleeding, including a modification to the Sharpe definition, on clinically relevant processes and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of adult trauma patients admitted from the field to a Level I trauma center from 2014 to 2019. Data sources were the trauma registry, blood bank, and electronic medical records. Transfusion thresholds were defined as follows: Resuscitation Intensity-4 units of any combination of crystalloids, colloids, or blood products within the first 30 min of arrival; Sharpe-10 red blood cell units from trauma bay presentation to inpatient admission (a proxy for the interval of hemorrhage control); Modified Sharpe-10 units of any combination of blood products during the same interval. The study analysis consisted of descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort contained 187 subjects. Of 39 deaths, 28 (72%) occurred within 6 hr following arrival. Modified Sharpe captured 27 (96%) of these 28 subjects, whereas Resuscitation Intensity captured 20 (71%). Sharpe and the traditional definition each captured 22 subjects (79%). Modified Sharpe captured 17%-25% of deaths missed by the other definitions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Modified Sharpe may optimally indicate major bleeding during trauma resuscitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Trauma Nursing\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"7-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Trauma Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000762\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000762","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大量输血的传统定义是在 24 小时内输注 10 个红细胞单位。 这一定义因排除了因失血过多而过早死亡的患者而受到指责。创伤文献中的其他大出血定义包括基于时间的(如复苏强度)和基于事件的(如夏普)输血阈值:研究目的是比较四种大出血定义(包括对夏普定义的修改)对临床相关过程和结果的影响:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是 2014 年至 2019 年期间从现场入住一级创伤中心的成人创伤患者。数据来源包括创伤登记处、血库和电子病历。输血阈值定义如下:到达后 30 分钟内的复苏强度-4 个单位的晶体液、胶体液或血液制品的任何组合;从创伤室到入院的夏普-10 个红细胞单位(代表出血控制间隔时间);同一间隔时间内的改良夏普-10 个单位的血液制品的任何组合。研究分析包括描述性统计:结果:队列中有 187 名受试者。在 39 例死亡病例中,28 例(72%)发生在抵达后 6 小时内。改良夏普法捕获了这 28 例受试者中的 27 例(96%),而复苏强度捕获了 20 例(71%)。夏普和传统定义各捕获了 22 名受试者(79%)。修改后的夏普捕捉到了其他定义所遗漏的 17%-25% 的死亡病例:结论:修改后的夏普可能是创伤复苏期间大出血的最佳指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Seeking a Relevant Description of Major Trauma Bleeding: Comparison of Four Major Bleeding Definitions.

Background: The traditional definition of massive transfusion is 10 red blood cell units transfused within 24 hr. This definition has been faulted for excluding patients who die early from exsanguination. Alternative major bleeding definitions in the trauma literature include time-based (e.g., Resuscitation Intensity) and event based (e.g., Sharpe) transfusion thresholds.

Objective: The study objective was to compare four definitions of major bleeding, including a modification to the Sharpe definition, on clinically relevant processes and outcomes.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of adult trauma patients admitted from the field to a Level I trauma center from 2014 to 2019. Data sources were the trauma registry, blood bank, and electronic medical records. Transfusion thresholds were defined as follows: Resuscitation Intensity-4 units of any combination of crystalloids, colloids, or blood products within the first 30 min of arrival; Sharpe-10 red blood cell units from trauma bay presentation to inpatient admission (a proxy for the interval of hemorrhage control); Modified Sharpe-10 units of any combination of blood products during the same interval. The study analysis consisted of descriptive statistics.

Results: The cohort contained 187 subjects. Of 39 deaths, 28 (72%) occurred within 6 hr following arrival. Modified Sharpe captured 27 (96%) of these 28 subjects, whereas Resuscitation Intensity captured 20 (71%). Sharpe and the traditional definition each captured 22 subjects (79%). Modified Sharpe captured 17%-25% of deaths missed by the other definitions.

Conclusion: Modified Sharpe may optimally indicate major bleeding during trauma resuscitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Trauma Nursing
Journal of Trauma Nursing CRITICAL CARE MEDICINENURSING&-NURSING
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Trauma Nursing (JTN) is the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses. The Society of Trauma Nurses believes that trauma is a disease impacting patients through the continuum of care. The mission of STN is to ensure optimal trauma care through education, collaboration, leadership and membership engagement. As the official publication of the Society of Trauma Nurses, the Journal of Trauma Nursing supports the STN’s strategic goals of effective communication, education and patient advocacy with original, peer-reviewed, research and evidence-based articles and information that reflect the highest standard of collaborative care for trauma patients.​ The Journal of Trauma Nursing, through a commitment to editorial excellence, implements STN’s vision to improve practice and patient outcomes and to become the premiere global nursing organization across the trauma continuum.
期刊最新文献
Acellular Dermal Matrices in Reconstructive Pediatric Complex Lower Limb Trauma: An Observational Study. Experiences of Nurse Managers in the 2023 Kahramanmaras, Turkey Earthquakes: A Qualitative Study. A Brief Intervention for Injury-Related Traumatic Stress: Results From a Feasibility Study. A Brief Intervention for Injury-Related Traumatic Stress: Results From a Feasibility Study. Gender-Based Analysis of Injury Types and Risk Factors in Professional Tennis Players - Insights for Prevention: A Concise Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1