腰椎椎间融合技术的射线稳定性。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1177/21925682241226659
Alice Bouchard, Jeffrey Mun, Frank Vazquez, Alex Tang, Edward Delsole, Russell Strom, Tan Chen
{"title":"腰椎椎间融合技术的射线稳定性。","authors":"Alice Bouchard, Jeffrey Mun, Frank Vazquez, Alex Tang, Edward Delsole, Russell Strom, Tan Chen","doi":"10.1177/21925682241226659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) can be achieved with various techniques. Evidence supporting the long-term clinical advantages of one technique over another are inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the changes in sagittal parameters in the preoperative, intraoperative, and post-operative phase, (2) evaluate the radiographic maintenance of these parameters over time, and (3) compare the demographics and patient reported outcomes of patients undergoing various LIF techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with degenerative spine disease undergoing single level anterior (ALIF), lateral (LLIF), posterior (PLIF), or transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion. Data collected included patient demographics and diagnosis at time of surgery. Upright lumbar radiographs taken pre-operatively, intra-operatively, and post-operatively were measured for lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), posterior disc height (PDH), and foraminal height (FH).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>194 patients in a single center were included. PDH and FH increased intra-operatively following ALIF (<i>P</i> < .0001), PLIF (<i>P</i> < .0001), LLIF (<i>P</i> < .0001), and TLIF (<i>P</i> < .0001). SL also increased intra-operatively for ALIF (<i>P</i> = .002) and LLIF (<i>P</i> = .0007). Compared to intra-operative radiographs, PDH and FH decreased at latest post-operative phase for ALIF (<i>P</i> < .03), LLIF (<i>P</i> < .003), TLIF (<i>P</i> < .001), and PLIF (<i>P</i> < .005). SL decreased for ALIF (<i>P</i> = .0008), and TLIF (<i>P</i> = .02). LL did not change postoperatively across techniques. Patient reported outcomes improved post-surgically and disability index decreased, but neither differed between techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LIF, regardless of technique, was shown to provide significant radiographic changes in PDH and FH. Techniques utilizing larger intervertebral cage sizes (ALIF/LLIF) improved SL. Single level LIF did not affect overall LL. No single technique displayed superior radiographic robustness over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"59-65"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiographic Robustness of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Alice Bouchard, Jeffrey Mun, Frank Vazquez, Alex Tang, Edward Delsole, Russell Strom, Tan Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682241226659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) can be achieved with various techniques. Evidence supporting the long-term clinical advantages of one technique over another are inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the changes in sagittal parameters in the preoperative, intraoperative, and post-operative phase, (2) evaluate the radiographic maintenance of these parameters over time, and (3) compare the demographics and patient reported outcomes of patients undergoing various LIF techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with degenerative spine disease undergoing single level anterior (ALIF), lateral (LLIF), posterior (PLIF), or transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion. Data collected included patient demographics and diagnosis at time of surgery. Upright lumbar radiographs taken pre-operatively, intra-operatively, and post-operatively were measured for lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), posterior disc height (PDH), and foraminal height (FH).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>194 patients in a single center were included. PDH and FH increased intra-operatively following ALIF (<i>P</i> < .0001), PLIF (<i>P</i> < .0001), LLIF (<i>P</i> < .0001), and TLIF (<i>P</i> < .0001). SL also increased intra-operatively for ALIF (<i>P</i> = .002) and LLIF (<i>P</i> = .0007). Compared to intra-operative radiographs, PDH and FH decreased at latest post-operative phase for ALIF (<i>P</i> < .03), LLIF (<i>P</i> < .003), TLIF (<i>P</i> < .001), and PLIF (<i>P</i> < .005). SL decreased for ALIF (<i>P</i> = .0008), and TLIF (<i>P</i> = .02). LL did not change postoperatively across techniques. Patient reported outcomes improved post-surgically and disability index decreased, but neither differed between techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LIF, regardless of technique, was shown to provide significant radiographic changes in PDH and FH. Techniques utilizing larger intervertebral cage sizes (ALIF/LLIF) improved SL. Single level LIF did not affect overall LL. No single technique displayed superior radiographic robustness over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"59-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572118/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241226659\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241226659","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计回顾性病历审查:腰椎椎间融合术(LIF)可通过多种技术实现。目前尚无证据证明一种技术比另一种技术具有长期临床优势。本研究的目的是:(1) 确定术前、术中和术后阶段矢状面参数的变化;(2) 评估这些参数随时间推移的影像学维持情况;(3) 比较接受各种 LIF 技术的患者的人口统计学特征和患者报告的结果:我们对接受单水平前路(ALIF)、侧路(LLIF)、后路(PLIF)或经椎间孔(TLIF)腰椎椎体间融合术的退行性脊柱疾病患者进行了回顾性病历审查。收集的数据包括患者的人口统计学特征和手术时的诊断。在术前、术中和术后拍摄的腰椎直立位X光片上测量腰椎前凸(LL)、节段前凸(SL)、后椎间盘高度(PDH)和椎管高度(FH):结果:一个中心共纳入 194 名患者。ALIF (P < .0001)、PLIF (P < .0001)、LLIF (P < .0001)和TLIF (P < .0001)术中PDH和FH均有所增加。ALIF(P = .002)和 LLIF(P = .0007)术中 SL 也有所增加。与术中X光片相比,ALIF(P<.03)、LLIF(P<.003)、TLIF(P<.001)和PLIF(P<.005)术后最近阶段的PDH和FH均有所下降。ALIF (P = .0008) 和 TLIF (P = .02) 的 SL 有所下降。不同技术的 LL 术后均无变化。术后患者报告的结果有所改善,残疾指数有所下降,但两种技术之间均无差异:结论:无论采用哪种技术,LIF都能使PDH和FH发生显著的影像学变化。采用较大椎间笼尺寸的技术(ALIF/LLIF)可改善SL。单水平 LIF 不影响整体 LL。随着时间的推移,没有一种技术显示出卓越的放射学稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Radiographic Robustness of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Objectives: Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) can be achieved with various techniques. Evidence supporting the long-term clinical advantages of one technique over another are inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the changes in sagittal parameters in the preoperative, intraoperative, and post-operative phase, (2) evaluate the radiographic maintenance of these parameters over time, and (3) compare the demographics and patient reported outcomes of patients undergoing various LIF techniques.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with degenerative spine disease undergoing single level anterior (ALIF), lateral (LLIF), posterior (PLIF), or transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion. Data collected included patient demographics and diagnosis at time of surgery. Upright lumbar radiographs taken pre-operatively, intra-operatively, and post-operatively were measured for lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), posterior disc height (PDH), and foraminal height (FH).

Results: 194 patients in a single center were included. PDH and FH increased intra-operatively following ALIF (P < .0001), PLIF (P < .0001), LLIF (P < .0001), and TLIF (P < .0001). SL also increased intra-operatively for ALIF (P = .002) and LLIF (P = .0007). Compared to intra-operative radiographs, PDH and FH decreased at latest post-operative phase for ALIF (P < .03), LLIF (P < .003), TLIF (P < .001), and PLIF (P < .005). SL decreased for ALIF (P = .0008), and TLIF (P = .02). LL did not change postoperatively across techniques. Patient reported outcomes improved post-surgically and disability index decreased, but neither differed between techniques.

Conclusion: LIF, regardless of technique, was shown to provide significant radiographic changes in PDH and FH. Techniques utilizing larger intervertebral cage sizes (ALIF/LLIF) improved SL. Single level LIF did not affect overall LL. No single technique displayed superior radiographic robustness over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Complications and Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Primary Hypercoagulable Disorders. Thanks to Reviewers. Effect of Baseline Adjacent Segment Degeneration on Clinical Outcomes After Lumbar Fusion. Pain and Functional Outcome After Microsurgical Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Very Short- and Long-Term Postoperative Analysis. Perioperative Dysphagia Considerations for Patients With Severe Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1