临床和非临床工作人员心血管疾病常规风险因素的流行和比较。

Sunita Khadka, Suraksha Dhungana, Dipanker Prajapati, Murari Dhungana, Prati Badan Dangol, Roji Shakya, Binita Tamrakar, Unnati Kandel, Chandra Mani Adhikari
{"title":"临床和非临床工作人员心血管疾病常规风险因素的流行和比较。","authors":"Sunita Khadka, Suraksha Dhungana, Dipanker Prajapati, Murari Dhungana, Prati Badan Dangol, Roji Shakya, Binita Tamrakar, Unnati Kandel, Chandra Mani Adhikari","doi":"10.33314/jnhrc.v21i02.4453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death around the globe. A number of studies have shown that hospital staff are vulnerable to cardiovascular disease due to a certain risk of shift duty. It is important to identify cardiovascular risk factors among hospital staff. The aim of this study is, to assess the prevalence of conventional risk factors of cardiovascular disease among hospital staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted among staff working at a Shahid Gangalal National Heart Center, a tertiary cardiac center in Nepal. Simple and multiple linear regression analyses were used to examine the association between independent variables and cardiovascular diseases. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 20.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 250 hospital staff participated in this study. Among them, 137 were clinical staff and 113 were non-clinical staff. The mean age of clinical staff and the non-clinical staff was 33.69 ± 7.02 years and 38.7 ± 10.58 years respectively with a total of 66.8% females. Prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidaemia was less in clinical staff compared to non-clinical staff. The mean systolic, diastolic BP was high in non-clinical staff ( P-value 0.001), moreover mean HDL-C was low (1.2 ± 0.2 mmol). BMI was significantly low in clinical staff. [standardized β= -0.24; 95% CI: -2.90, -0.88].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors were high in non-clinical staff compared to clinical staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":16380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Comparision of Conventional Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Disease Between Clinical and Nonclinical Staff.\",\"authors\":\"Sunita Khadka, Suraksha Dhungana, Dipanker Prajapati, Murari Dhungana, Prati Badan Dangol, Roji Shakya, Binita Tamrakar, Unnati Kandel, Chandra Mani Adhikari\",\"doi\":\"10.33314/jnhrc.v21i02.4453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death around the globe. A number of studies have shown that hospital staff are vulnerable to cardiovascular disease due to a certain risk of shift duty. It is important to identify cardiovascular risk factors among hospital staff. The aim of this study is, to assess the prevalence of conventional risk factors of cardiovascular disease among hospital staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted among staff working at a Shahid Gangalal National Heart Center, a tertiary cardiac center in Nepal. Simple and multiple linear regression analyses were used to examine the association between independent variables and cardiovascular diseases. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 20.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 250 hospital staff participated in this study. Among them, 137 were clinical staff and 113 were non-clinical staff. The mean age of clinical staff and the non-clinical staff was 33.69 ± 7.02 years and 38.7 ± 10.58 years respectively with a total of 66.8% females. Prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidaemia was less in clinical staff compared to non-clinical staff. The mean systolic, diastolic BP was high in non-clinical staff ( P-value 0.001), moreover mean HDL-C was low (1.2 ± 0.2 mmol). BMI was significantly low in clinical staff. [standardized β= -0.24; 95% CI: -2.90, -0.88].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors were high in non-clinical staff compared to clinical staff.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v21i02.4453\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Health Research Council","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v21i02.4453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心血管疾病是全球死亡的主要原因。许多研究表明,由于轮班工作存在一定风险,医院员工很容易患心血管疾病。确定医院员工的心血管风险因素非常重要。本研究旨在评估心血管疾病常规风险因素在医院员工中的流行情况:对尼泊尔一家三级心脏病中心--Shahid Gangalal 国家心脏中心的工作人员进行了一项定量横断面研究。研究采用简单和多元线性回归分析法来检验自变量与心血管疾病之间的关系。统计分析采用 SPSS 软件 20 版:共有 250 名医院员工参与了此次研究。结果:共有 250 名医院员工参与了此次研究,其中 137 人为临床员工,113 人为非临床员工。临床人员和非临床人员的平均年龄分别为(33.69±7.02)岁和(38.7±10.58)岁,女性占 66.8%。与非临床工作人员相比,临床工作人员的高血压、糖尿病和血脂异常患病率较低。非临床工作人员的平均收缩压和舒张压较高(P 值为 0.001),而且平均高密度脂蛋白胆固醇较低(1.2 ± 0.2 mmol)。临床工作人员的体重指数明显偏低。[标准化 β= -0.24; 95% CI: -2.90, -0.88]:结论:与临床工作人员相比,非临床工作人员的心血管风险因素发生率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence and Comparision of Conventional Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Disease Between Clinical and Nonclinical Staff.

Background: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death around the globe. A number of studies have shown that hospital staff are vulnerable to cardiovascular disease due to a certain risk of shift duty. It is important to identify cardiovascular risk factors among hospital staff. The aim of this study is, to assess the prevalence of conventional risk factors of cardiovascular disease among hospital staff.

Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted among staff working at a Shahid Gangalal National Heart Center, a tertiary cardiac center in Nepal. Simple and multiple linear regression analyses were used to examine the association between independent variables and cardiovascular diseases. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 20.

Results: A total of 250 hospital staff participated in this study. Among them, 137 were clinical staff and 113 were non-clinical staff. The mean age of clinical staff and the non-clinical staff was 33.69 ± 7.02 years and 38.7 ± 10.58 years respectively with a total of 66.8% females. Prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidaemia was less in clinical staff compared to non-clinical staff. The mean systolic, diastolic BP was high in non-clinical staff ( P-value 0.001), moreover mean HDL-C was low (1.2 ± 0.2 mmol). BMI was significantly low in clinical staff. [standardized β= -0.24; 95% CI: -2.90, -0.88].

Conclusions: The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors were high in non-clinical staff compared to clinical staff.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles related to researches done in the field of biomedical sciences related to all the discipline of the medical sciences, medical education, public health, health care management, including ethical and social issues pertaining to health. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Editorial, Guest Editorial, Viewpoint and letter to the editor are solicited by the editorial board. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding manuscript submission and processing at JNHRC.
期刊最新文献
A Critical Analysis of Safe Abortion Road Map in Nepal. Amitriptyline, Pregabalin and Duloxetine for Treatment of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. Choroidal Thickness Measurement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients with or Without Ocular Manifestation. Chronic Cavitary Pulmonary Aspergillosis: Complication of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Clinical Characteristics of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy and Outcome of Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1