放射学模式在诊断和描述脑部疾病方面的有效性。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosciences Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.17712/nsj.2024.1.20230048
Sadeem Aljahdali, Ghofran Azim, Waad Zabani, Saeed Bafaraj, Jaber Alyami, Ahmed Abduljabbar
{"title":"放射学模式在诊断和描述脑部疾病方面的有效性。","authors":"Sadeem Aljahdali, Ghofran Azim, Waad Zabani, Saeed Bafaraj, Jaber Alyami, Ahmed Abduljabbar","doi":"10.17712/nsj.2024.1.20230048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To observe the accuracy of Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans in evaluating neurological disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective research used CT or MRI to diagnose and characterize brain disorders. Patients' records suffering from neurological disorders were considered eligible for inclusion, regardless of the time of appearance of symptoms, the severity of their symptoms, or their final clinical diagnosis. The exclusion criteria for this study involved patients who did not undergo either a CT or MRI scan. A chi-square test was performed to observe the association between the study variables. A total of 3155 cases were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most prevalent comorbid was dyslipidemia 670 (21.6%) followed by hypertension 548 (17.6%). Overall brain disorders were confirmed in 2426 (77%) patients. It was observed that half of the patients 1543 (48.9%) were diagnosed with stroke. It was found that the accuracy of CT and MRI was 78% and 74% respectively. The association of modalities, patient type, and gender with the confirmation of diseases was not found significant (<i>p</i>=>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study revealed that CT and MRI were accurate by more than 75% and no difference was between both techniques to detect neurological disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":19284,"journal":{"name":"Neurosciences","volume":"29 1","pages":"37-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10827017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of radiology modalities in diagnosing and characterizing brain disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Sadeem Aljahdali, Ghofran Azim, Waad Zabani, Saeed Bafaraj, Jaber Alyami, Ahmed Abduljabbar\",\"doi\":\"10.17712/nsj.2024.1.20230048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To observe the accuracy of Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans in evaluating neurological disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective research used CT or MRI to diagnose and characterize brain disorders. Patients' records suffering from neurological disorders were considered eligible for inclusion, regardless of the time of appearance of symptoms, the severity of their symptoms, or their final clinical diagnosis. The exclusion criteria for this study involved patients who did not undergo either a CT or MRI scan. A chi-square test was performed to observe the association between the study variables. A total of 3155 cases were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most prevalent comorbid was dyslipidemia 670 (21.6%) followed by hypertension 548 (17.6%). Overall brain disorders were confirmed in 2426 (77%) patients. It was observed that half of the patients 1543 (48.9%) were diagnosed with stroke. It was found that the accuracy of CT and MRI was 78% and 74% respectively. The association of modalities, patient type, and gender with the confirmation of diseases was not found significant (<i>p</i>=>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study revealed that CT and MRI were accurate by more than 75% and no difference was between both techniques to detect neurological disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosciences\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"37-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10827017/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2024.1.20230048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2024.1.20230048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的观察计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)扫描评估神经系统疾病的准确性:这项回顾性研究使用 CT 或 MRI 诊断和描述脑部疾病。无论症状出现的时间、症状的严重程度或最终临床诊断如何,神经系统疾病患者的病历均被视为符合纳入条件。本研究的排除标准包括未接受 CT 或 MRI 扫描的患者。为观察研究变量之间的联系,我们进行了卡方检验。共分析了 3155 个病例:最常见的合并症是血脂异常 670 例(21.6%),其次是高血压 548 例(17.6%)。有 2426 名(77%)患者确诊患有脑部疾病。据观察,1543 名(48.9%)患者中有一半被诊断为中风。研究发现,CT 和 MRI 的准确率分别为 78% 和 74%。研究发现,各种模式、患者类型和性别与疾病确诊的关系并不显著(P=>0.05):我们的研究表明,CT 和 MRI 的准确率均超过 75%,两种技术在检测神经系统疾病方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of radiology modalities in diagnosing and characterizing brain disorders.

Objectives: To observe the accuracy of Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans in evaluating neurological disorders.

Methods: This retrospective research used CT or MRI to diagnose and characterize brain disorders. Patients' records suffering from neurological disorders were considered eligible for inclusion, regardless of the time of appearance of symptoms, the severity of their symptoms, or their final clinical diagnosis. The exclusion criteria for this study involved patients who did not undergo either a CT or MRI scan. A chi-square test was performed to observe the association between the study variables. A total of 3155 cases were analyzed.

Results: The most prevalent comorbid was dyslipidemia 670 (21.6%) followed by hypertension 548 (17.6%). Overall brain disorders were confirmed in 2426 (77%) patients. It was observed that half of the patients 1543 (48.9%) were diagnosed with stroke. It was found that the accuracy of CT and MRI was 78% and 74% respectively. The association of modalities, patient type, and gender with the confirmation of diseases was not found significant (p=>0.05).

Conclusion: Our study revealed that CT and MRI were accurate by more than 75% and no difference was between both techniques to detect neurological disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosciences
Neurosciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Neurosciences is an open access, peer-reviewed, quarterly publication. Authors are invited to submit for publication articles reporting original work related to the nervous system, e.g., neurology, neurophysiology, neuroradiology, neurosurgery, neurorehabilitation, neurooncology, neuropsychiatry, and neurogenetics, etc. Basic research withclear clinical implications will also be considered. Review articles of current interest and high standard are welcomed for consideration. Prospective workshould not be backdated. There are also sections for Case Reports, Brief Communication, Correspondence, and medical news items. To promote continuous education, training, and learning, we include Clinical Images and MCQ’s. Highlights of international and regional meetings of interest, and specialized supplements will also be considered. All submissions must conform to the Uniform Requirements.
期刊最新文献
A rare case of pituitary dysfunction with Moyamoya disease. Assessment of social stigma among multiple sclerosis patients in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. Clinical outcomes of optic neuritis: A retrospective study at a tertiary medical center in Saudi Arabia. Comment on: Critically ill neuropathy alone is sufficient to explain proximal limb weakness and femoral nerve damage in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Comment on: Outcomes and complications of patients with cerebral venous thrombosis: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1