医护人员的心理健康需求:当证据不能指导政策时。对部分欧洲国家的比较评估。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES International Journal of Health Planning and Management Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1002/hpm.3752
Ellen Kuhlmann, Michelle Falkenbach, Monica-Georgiana Brînzac, Tiago Correia, Maria Panagioti, Marius-Ionut Ungureanu
{"title":"医护人员的心理健康需求:当证据不能指导政策时。对部分欧洲国家的比较评估。","authors":"Ellen Kuhlmann,&nbsp;Michelle Falkenbach,&nbsp;Monica-Georgiana Brînzac,&nbsp;Tiago Correia,&nbsp;Maria Panagioti,&nbsp;Marius-Ionut Ungureanu","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The healthcare workforce (HCWF) globally is facing high stress levels and deteriorating mental health due to workplace, labour market and policy deficiencies that further exacerbate the existing crisis. However, comprehensive and effective action is missing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>We adopt a health system and governance perspective to address the mental health needs of healthcare workers (HCWs), considering the nature of interventions and the levels and actors involved in governance. The aim is to move the debate forward by identifying governance gaps hampering the implementation of health workforce policies and exploring strategies to effectively increase mental health support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A qualitative comparative methodology is applied based on a case study design utilising a multi-level intersectoral governance matrix. We conducted a rapid assessment of HCWF developments in the European context (Germany, Portugal, Romania, Switzerland and the United Kingdom), drawing on secondary sources and country experts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Awareness of mental health threats among HCWs increased, but policy discourse is driven by service delivery and labour market demands. The attention to HCWs' needs is stronger on the international level and weakest at national/regional levels. Although organisations and professions demonstrate varying degrees of activity, their efforts are scattered and lack sustainability. Similar challenges were identified across healthcare systems, including limited action, disconnected actors, missing coordination, and a lack of attention to governance gaps and system weaknesses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Adopting a health system approach is important but not sufficient. Successful mental health policy implementation needs multi-level governance and coherent coordination mechanisms.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpm.3752","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The mental health needs of healthcare workers: When evidence does not guide policy. A comparative assessment of selected European countries\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Kuhlmann,&nbsp;Michelle Falkenbach,&nbsp;Monica-Georgiana Brînzac,&nbsp;Tiago Correia,&nbsp;Maria Panagioti,&nbsp;Marius-Ionut Ungureanu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpm.3752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The healthcare workforce (HCWF) globally is facing high stress levels and deteriorating mental health due to workplace, labour market and policy deficiencies that further exacerbate the existing crisis. However, comprehensive and effective action is missing.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>We adopt a health system and governance perspective to address the mental health needs of healthcare workers (HCWs), considering the nature of interventions and the levels and actors involved in governance. The aim is to move the debate forward by identifying governance gaps hampering the implementation of health workforce policies and exploring strategies to effectively increase mental health support.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A qualitative comparative methodology is applied based on a case study design utilising a multi-level intersectoral governance matrix. We conducted a rapid assessment of HCWF developments in the European context (Germany, Portugal, Romania, Switzerland and the United Kingdom), drawing on secondary sources and country experts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results and Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Awareness of mental health threats among HCWs increased, but policy discourse is driven by service delivery and labour market demands. The attention to HCWs' needs is stronger on the international level and weakest at national/regional levels. Although organisations and professions demonstrate varying degrees of activity, their efforts are scattered and lack sustainability. Similar challenges were identified across healthcare systems, including limited action, disconnected actors, missing coordination, and a lack of attention to governance gaps and system weaknesses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adopting a health system approach is important but not sufficient. Successful mental health policy implementation needs multi-level governance and coherent coordination mechanisms.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpm.3752\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Planning and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpm.3752\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpm.3752","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于工作场所、劳动力市场和政策方面的缺陷进一步加剧了现有危机,全球医疗保健工作者(HCWF)正面临着高压力水平和不断恶化的心理健康问题。目的:我们从卫生系统和治理的角度来解决医护人员(HCWs)的心理健康需求问题,同时考虑到干预措施的性质以及治理所涉及的层面和参与者。我们的目的是通过找出阻碍医疗卫生人员政策实施的治理差距,探索有效增加心理健康支持的策略,从而推动讨论向前发展:材料和方法:我们在案例研究设计的基础上,利用多层次跨部门治理矩阵,采用了定性比较方法。我们借鉴二手资料来源和各国专家的意见,对欧洲(德国、葡萄牙、罗马尼亚、瑞士和英国)的精神卫生工作者队伍发展情况进行了快速评估:高危职业工作者对心理健康威胁的认识有所提高,但政策讨论是由服务提供和劳动力市场需求驱动的。国际层面对高危职业工人需求的关注度较高,而国家/地区层面的关注度最低。尽管各组织和行业开展了不同程度的活动,但其工作分散且缺乏可持续性。在整个医疗保健系统中也发现了类似的挑战,包括行动有限、参与者脱节、协调缺失以及缺乏对治理差距和系统薄弱环节的关注:结论:采用医疗系统方法很重要,但还不够。成功实施心理健康政策需要多层次的管理和协调一致的协调机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The mental health needs of healthcare workers: When evidence does not guide policy. A comparative assessment of selected European countries

Background

The healthcare workforce (HCWF) globally is facing high stress levels and deteriorating mental health due to workplace, labour market and policy deficiencies that further exacerbate the existing crisis. However, comprehensive and effective action is missing.

Aims

We adopt a health system and governance perspective to address the mental health needs of healthcare workers (HCWs), considering the nature of interventions and the levels and actors involved in governance. The aim is to move the debate forward by identifying governance gaps hampering the implementation of health workforce policies and exploring strategies to effectively increase mental health support.

Material and Methods

A qualitative comparative methodology is applied based on a case study design utilising a multi-level intersectoral governance matrix. We conducted a rapid assessment of HCWF developments in the European context (Germany, Portugal, Romania, Switzerland and the United Kingdom), drawing on secondary sources and country experts.

Results and Discussion

Awareness of mental health threats among HCWs increased, but policy discourse is driven by service delivery and labour market demands. The attention to HCWs' needs is stronger on the international level and weakest at national/regional levels. Although organisations and professions demonstrate varying degrees of activity, their efforts are scattered and lack sustainability. Similar challenges were identified across healthcare systems, including limited action, disconnected actors, missing coordination, and a lack of attention to governance gaps and system weaknesses.

Conclusion

Adopting a health system approach is important but not sufficient. Successful mental health policy implementation needs multi-level governance and coherent coordination mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
期刊最新文献
Voluntary private health insurance and cancer screening utilisation in Europe. Issue Information Reassessing physician interactions with pharmaceutical companies: A response to Murayama et al. and analysis of survey discrepancies. The experiences of minority language users in health and social care research: A systematic review. Steering them softly with a quality label? A case study analysis of a patient channelling strategy without financial incentives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1