支持家长/护理人员和青少年自我护理湿疹的两种在线干预措施的成本效益。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS European Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1007/s10198-023-01649-9
Tracey H Sach, Mary Onoja, Holly Clarke, Miriam Santer, Ingrid Muller, Taeko Becque, Beth Stuart, Julie Hooper, Mary Steele, Sylvia Wilczynska, Matthew J Ridd, Amanda Roberts, Amina Ahmed, Lucy Yardley, Paul Little, Kate Greenwell, Katy Sivyer, Jacqui Nuttall, Gareth Griffiths, Sandra Lawton, Sinéad M Langan, Laura Howells, Paul Leighton, Hywel C Williams, Kim S Thomas
{"title":"支持家长/护理人员和青少年自我护理湿疹的两种在线干预措施的成本效益。","authors":"Tracey H Sach, Mary Onoja, Holly Clarke, Miriam Santer, Ingrid Muller, Taeko Becque, Beth Stuart, Julie Hooper, Mary Steele, Sylvia Wilczynska, Matthew J Ridd, Amanda Roberts, Amina Ahmed, Lucy Yardley, Paul Little, Kate Greenwell, Katy Sivyer, Jacqui Nuttall, Gareth Griffiths, Sandra Lawton, Sinéad M Langan, Laura Howells, Paul Leighton, Hywel C Williams, Kim S Thomas","doi":"10.1007/s10198-023-01649-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the cost-effectiveness of online behavioral interventions (EczemaCareOnline.org.uk) designed to support eczema self-care management for parents/carers and young people from an NHS perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two within-trial economic evaluations, using regression-based approaches, adjusting for baseline and pre-specified confounder variables, were undertaken alongside two independent, pragmatic, parallel group, unmasked randomized controlled trials, recruiting through primary care. Trial 1 recruited 340 parents/carers of children aged 0-12 years and Trial 2 337 young people aged 13-25 years with eczema scored ≥ 5 on Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). Participants were randomized (1:1) to online intervention plus usual care or usual care alone. Resource use, collected via medical notes review, was valued using published unit costs in UK £Sterling 2021. Quality-of-life was elicited using proxy CHU-9D in Trial 1 and self-report EQ-5D-5L in Trial 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention was dominant (cost saving and more effective) with a high probability of cost-effectiveness (> 68%) in most analyses. The exception was the complete case cost-utility analysis for Trial 1 (omitting participants with children aged < 2), with adjusted incremental cost savings of -£34.15 (95% CI  - 104.54 to 36.24) and incremental QALYs of - 0.003 (95% CI  - 0.021 to 0.015) producing an incremental cost per QALY of £12,466. In the secondary combined (Trials 1 and 2) cost-effectiveness analysis, the adjusted incremental cost was -£20.35 (95% CI  - 55.41 to 14.70) with incremental success (≥ 2-point change on POEM) of 10.3% (95% CI 2.3-18.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The free at point of use online eczema self-management intervention was low cost to run and cost-effective.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was registered prospectively with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN79282252). URL www.EczemaCareOnline.org.uk .</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness of two online interventions supporting self-care for eczema for parents/carers and young people.\",\"authors\":\"Tracey H Sach, Mary Onoja, Holly Clarke, Miriam Santer, Ingrid Muller, Taeko Becque, Beth Stuart, Julie Hooper, Mary Steele, Sylvia Wilczynska, Matthew J Ridd, Amanda Roberts, Amina Ahmed, Lucy Yardley, Paul Little, Kate Greenwell, Katy Sivyer, Jacqui Nuttall, Gareth Griffiths, Sandra Lawton, Sinéad M Langan, Laura Howells, Paul Leighton, Hywel C Williams, Kim S Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10198-023-01649-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the cost-effectiveness of online behavioral interventions (EczemaCareOnline.org.uk) designed to support eczema self-care management for parents/carers and young people from an NHS perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two within-trial economic evaluations, using regression-based approaches, adjusting for baseline and pre-specified confounder variables, were undertaken alongside two independent, pragmatic, parallel group, unmasked randomized controlled trials, recruiting through primary care. Trial 1 recruited 340 parents/carers of children aged 0-12 years and Trial 2 337 young people aged 13-25 years with eczema scored ≥ 5 on Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). Participants were randomized (1:1) to online intervention plus usual care or usual care alone. Resource use, collected via medical notes review, was valued using published unit costs in UK £Sterling 2021. Quality-of-life was elicited using proxy CHU-9D in Trial 1 and self-report EQ-5D-5L in Trial 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention was dominant (cost saving and more effective) with a high probability of cost-effectiveness (> 68%) in most analyses. The exception was the complete case cost-utility analysis for Trial 1 (omitting participants with children aged < 2), with adjusted incremental cost savings of -£34.15 (95% CI  - 104.54 to 36.24) and incremental QALYs of - 0.003 (95% CI  - 0.021 to 0.015) producing an incremental cost per QALY of £12,466. In the secondary combined (Trials 1 and 2) cost-effectiveness analysis, the adjusted incremental cost was -£20.35 (95% CI  - 55.41 to 14.70) with incremental success (≥ 2-point change on POEM) of 10.3% (95% CI 2.3-18.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The free at point of use online eczema self-management intervention was low cost to run and cost-effective.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was registered prospectively with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN79282252). URL www.EczemaCareOnline.org.uk .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377600/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-023-01649-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-023-01649-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:从英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的角度评估在线行为干预(EczemaCareOnline.org.uk)的成本效益:从英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的角度评估旨在支持父母/照护者和青少年湿疹自我护理管理的在线行为干预(EczemaCareOnline.org.uk)的成本效益:在进行两项独立、务实、平行组、无掩蔽随机对照试验的同时,还进行了两项试验内经济评估,采用基于回归的方法,对基线和预先指定的混杂变量进行调整,并通过初级保健进行招募。试验1招募了340名0-12岁儿童的家长/监护人,试验2招募了337名13-25岁的年轻人,这些年轻人的湿疹在 "以患者为导向的湿疹测量"(POEM)中得分≥5分。参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受在线干预加常规护理或仅接受常规护理。通过病历审查收集的资源使用情况采用已公布的单位成本进行估价,单位为 2021 英镑。在试验 1 中,使用代用 CHU-9D 对生活质量进行评估;在试验 2 中,使用自我报告 EQ-5D-5L 对生活质量进行评估:在大多数分析中,干预占主导地位(节约成本且更有效),成本效益概率高(> 68%)。但试验 1 的全病例成本效用分析是个例外(省略了有年幼子女的参与者):免费在线湿疹自我管理干预的运行成本低且具有成本效益:该试验已在ISRCTN登记处进行了前瞻性登记(ISRCTN79282252)。网址:www.EczemaCareOnline.org.uk 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost-effectiveness of two online interventions supporting self-care for eczema for parents/carers and young people.

Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of online behavioral interventions (EczemaCareOnline.org.uk) designed to support eczema self-care management for parents/carers and young people from an NHS perspective.

Methods: Two within-trial economic evaluations, using regression-based approaches, adjusting for baseline and pre-specified confounder variables, were undertaken alongside two independent, pragmatic, parallel group, unmasked randomized controlled trials, recruiting through primary care. Trial 1 recruited 340 parents/carers of children aged 0-12 years and Trial 2 337 young people aged 13-25 years with eczema scored ≥ 5 on Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). Participants were randomized (1:1) to online intervention plus usual care or usual care alone. Resource use, collected via medical notes review, was valued using published unit costs in UK £Sterling 2021. Quality-of-life was elicited using proxy CHU-9D in Trial 1 and self-report EQ-5D-5L in Trial 2.

Results: The intervention was dominant (cost saving and more effective) with a high probability of cost-effectiveness (> 68%) in most analyses. The exception was the complete case cost-utility analysis for Trial 1 (omitting participants with children aged < 2), with adjusted incremental cost savings of -£34.15 (95% CI  - 104.54 to 36.24) and incremental QALYs of - 0.003 (95% CI  - 0.021 to 0.015) producing an incremental cost per QALY of £12,466. In the secondary combined (Trials 1 and 2) cost-effectiveness analysis, the adjusted incremental cost was -£20.35 (95% CI  - 55.41 to 14.70) with incremental success (≥ 2-point change on POEM) of 10.3% (95% CI 2.3-18.1%).

Conclusion: The free at point of use online eczema self-management intervention was low cost to run and cost-effective.

Trial registration: This trial was registered prospectively with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN79282252). URL www.EczemaCareOnline.org.uk .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
期刊最新文献
Psychometric performance of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 in patients with lymphoma in China. What remains after the money ends? Evidence on whether admission reductions continued following the largest health and social care integration programme in England. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and SF-6Dv2 in patients with late-onset Pompe disease. The causal effect of early retirement on medication use across sex and occupation: evidence from Danish administrative data. Cost awareness among intensivists in their daily clinical practice: a prospective multicentre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1