比较多种交通传感器技术的拥堵模式检测率

IF 4.6 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI:10.1109/OJITS.2023.3341631
Lisa Kessler;Klaus Bogenberger
{"title":"比较多种交通传感器技术的拥堵模式检测率","authors":"Lisa Kessler;Klaus Bogenberger","doi":"10.1109/OJITS.2023.3341631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the detection rate of various freeway congestion patterns and compares them across different traffic sensor technologies. Congestion events can be categorized into multiple types, ranging from short traffic disruptions (referred to as Jam Wave) to Stop and Go patterns and severe congestion scenarios like Wide Jam. We analyze multiple traffic data sets, including speed data from loop detectors, travel time measurements from Bluetooth sensors, and floating car data (FCD) collected from probe vehicles. Each combination of congestion pattern and detection technology is thoroughly examined and evaluated in terms of its capability and suitability for identifying specific traffic congestion patterns. For our experimental site, we selected the freeway A9 in Germany, which spans a length of \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\mathrm {157~km}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n. Our findings reveal that Bluetooth sensors, which record travel times between two locations, are barely suited for detecting short traffic incidents such as Jam Waves due to their downstream detection direction, contrasting with the upstream congestion propagation. Segment-based speed calculations prove more effective in identifying significant congestion events. FCD tend to recognize Stop and Go patterns more frequently than loop detectors but often underestimate severe congestion due to their sensitivity to penetration rates and data availability.","PeriodicalId":100631,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems","volume":"5 ","pages":"29-40"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10356725","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection Rate of Congestion Patterns Comparing Multiple Traffic Sensor Technologies\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Kessler;Klaus Bogenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OJITS.2023.3341631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the detection rate of various freeway congestion patterns and compares them across different traffic sensor technologies. Congestion events can be categorized into multiple types, ranging from short traffic disruptions (referred to as Jam Wave) to Stop and Go patterns and severe congestion scenarios like Wide Jam. We analyze multiple traffic data sets, including speed data from loop detectors, travel time measurements from Bluetooth sensors, and floating car data (FCD) collected from probe vehicles. Each combination of congestion pattern and detection technology is thoroughly examined and evaluated in terms of its capability and suitability for identifying specific traffic congestion patterns. For our experimental site, we selected the freeway A9 in Germany, which spans a length of \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\mathrm {157~km}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n. Our findings reveal that Bluetooth sensors, which record travel times between two locations, are barely suited for detecting short traffic incidents such as Jam Waves due to their downstream detection direction, contrasting with the upstream congestion propagation. Segment-based speed calculations prove more effective in identifying significant congestion events. FCD tend to recognize Stop and Go patterns more frequently than loop detectors but often underestimate severe congestion due to their sensitivity to penetration rates and data availability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"29-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10356725\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10356725/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10356725/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了各种高速公路拥堵模式的检测率,并对不同交通传感器技术的检测率进行了比较。拥堵事件可分为多种类型,从短时间的交通中断(称为拥堵波)到 "走走停停 "模式和严重拥堵情景(如大面积拥堵)。我们分析了多个交通数据集,包括环路检测器的速度数据、蓝牙传感器的旅行时间测量数据以及探测车收集的浮动车数据(FCD)。我们对每种拥堵模式和检测技术的组合都进行了全面检查和评估,以确定其识别特定交通拥堵模式的能力和适用性。我们选择了德国的 A9 高速公路作为实验地点,该公路全长 $\mathrm {157~km}$ 。我们的研究结果表明,蓝牙传感器记录的是两个地点之间的旅行时间,由于其下游检测方向与上游拥堵传播方向相反,因此几乎不适合检测诸如拥堵波(Jam Waves)之类的短时间交通事故。事实证明,基于路段的速度计算在识别重大拥堵事件方面更为有效。与环路检测器相比,快速拥塞识别系统更能识别 "走走停停 "模式,但由于其对渗透率和数据可用性的敏感性,往往会低估严重拥塞的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Detection Rate of Congestion Patterns Comparing Multiple Traffic Sensor Technologies
This paper investigates the detection rate of various freeway congestion patterns and compares them across different traffic sensor technologies. Congestion events can be categorized into multiple types, ranging from short traffic disruptions (referred to as Jam Wave) to Stop and Go patterns and severe congestion scenarios like Wide Jam. We analyze multiple traffic data sets, including speed data from loop detectors, travel time measurements from Bluetooth sensors, and floating car data (FCD) collected from probe vehicles. Each combination of congestion pattern and detection technology is thoroughly examined and evaluated in terms of its capability and suitability for identifying specific traffic congestion patterns. For our experimental site, we selected the freeway A9 in Germany, which spans a length of $\mathrm {157~km}$ . Our findings reveal that Bluetooth sensors, which record travel times between two locations, are barely suited for detecting short traffic incidents such as Jam Waves due to their downstream detection direction, contrasting with the upstream congestion propagation. Segment-based speed calculations prove more effective in identifying significant congestion events. FCD tend to recognize Stop and Go patterns more frequently than loop detectors but often underestimate severe congestion due to their sensitivity to penetration rates and data availability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
2024 Index IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Vol. 5 Safety-Critical Oracles for Metamorphic Testing of Deep Learning LiDAR Point Cloud Object Detectors Front Cover IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Instructions for Authors IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF THE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS SOCIETY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1