利用倾向分数分析和结构方程模型阐明本科生毕业后参与高影响力实践活动的影响

IF 1.9 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1007/s11162-023-09767-2
Joanna L. Dickert, Jian Li
{"title":"利用倾向分数分析和结构方程模型阐明本科生毕业后参与高影响力实践活动的影响","authors":"Joanna L. Dickert, Jian Li","doi":"10.1007/s11162-023-09767-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As colleges and universities grapple with uncertainty around current and future enrollment as well as increasingly vocal questions about the value of postsecondary education, it is critically important that institutions ascertain and invest in the elements of campus learning and engagement that add value to the undergraduate experience. This study examines the relationship between cumulative participation in high-impact practices (HIPs) and the perceived importance of postsecondary experience in preparation for adult life using the Educational Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS) dataset. Employing a methodology proposed and tested by Leite et al. (Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 26(3):448–469, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1522591), this analysis incorporated the ability to account for self-selection into HIPs using propensity score (PS) analysis with a multiple-group structural equation model (SEM) design to examine differences between students who participated in two or more HIPs and those who did not (<i>n</i> = 3105). Results offered evidence of benefit to participation in two or more HIP experiences with positive and statistically significant differences in the perceived importance of postsecondary education in preparation for adult life across the analytic sample with doubly robust estimation techniques. Interaction effects for female students, students from low SES backgrounds, and students who are members of minoritized racial/ethnic populations were also identified. The findings offered evidence of post-graduation impact of cumulative participation in HIPs that can inform program development and student decision-making as well as the future use of analytic techniques such as PS analysis, doubly robust estimation, and sensitivity analysis to enhance measurement precision.</p>","PeriodicalId":48200,"journal":{"name":"Research in Higher Education","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illuminating the Post-Graduation Impact of Undergraduate Participation in High-Impact Practices Using Propensity Score Analysis with Structural Equation Modeling\",\"authors\":\"Joanna L. Dickert, Jian Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11162-023-09767-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As colleges and universities grapple with uncertainty around current and future enrollment as well as increasingly vocal questions about the value of postsecondary education, it is critically important that institutions ascertain and invest in the elements of campus learning and engagement that add value to the undergraduate experience. This study examines the relationship between cumulative participation in high-impact practices (HIPs) and the perceived importance of postsecondary experience in preparation for adult life using the Educational Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS) dataset. Employing a methodology proposed and tested by Leite et al. (Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 26(3):448–469, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1522591), this analysis incorporated the ability to account for self-selection into HIPs using propensity score (PS) analysis with a multiple-group structural equation model (SEM) design to examine differences between students who participated in two or more HIPs and those who did not (<i>n</i> = 3105). Results offered evidence of benefit to participation in two or more HIP experiences with positive and statistically significant differences in the perceived importance of postsecondary education in preparation for adult life across the analytic sample with doubly robust estimation techniques. Interaction effects for female students, students from low SES backgrounds, and students who are members of minoritized racial/ethnic populations were also identified. The findings offered evidence of post-graduation impact of cumulative participation in HIPs that can inform program development and student decision-making as well as the future use of analytic techniques such as PS analysis, doubly robust estimation, and sensitivity analysis to enhance measurement precision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-023-09767-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-023-09767-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着高校努力应对当前和未来招生的不确定性,以及对中学后教育价值日益强烈的质疑,各院校必须确定并投资于校园学习和参与的要素,为本科生的学习经历增添价值,这一点至关重要。本研究利用《2002 年教育纵向研究》(Educational Longitudinal Study of 2002,ELS)数据集,研究了累计参与高影响力实践(HIPs)与中学后教育经历对成人生活准备的重要性认知之间的关系。本分析采用了 Leite 等人提出并测试的方法(Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 26(3):448-469, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1522591),利用倾向得分(PS)分析和多组结构方程模型(SEM)设计,将自我选择纳入 HIPs 的能力纳入其中,以考察参与两个或更多 HIPs 的学生与未参与 HIPs 的学生(n = 3105)之间的差异。结果表明,参加两次或两次以上 HIP 的学生受益匪浅,在整个分析样本中,他们对中学后教育为成人生活做准备的重要性的认识存在积极的、统计上显著的差异,并采用了双重稳健估计技术。此外,还发现了女生、社会经济地位低的学生以及少数种族/民族学生的交互效应。研究结果提供了累计参与 HIPs 对毕业后影响的证据,可为项目开发和学生决策提供参考,也可为今后使用 PS 分析、双重稳健估计和敏感性分析等分析技术提高测量精度提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Illuminating the Post-Graduation Impact of Undergraduate Participation in High-Impact Practices Using Propensity Score Analysis with Structural Equation Modeling

As colleges and universities grapple with uncertainty around current and future enrollment as well as increasingly vocal questions about the value of postsecondary education, it is critically important that institutions ascertain and invest in the elements of campus learning and engagement that add value to the undergraduate experience. This study examines the relationship between cumulative participation in high-impact practices (HIPs) and the perceived importance of postsecondary experience in preparation for adult life using the Educational Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS) dataset. Employing a methodology proposed and tested by Leite et al. (Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 26(3):448–469, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1522591), this analysis incorporated the ability to account for self-selection into HIPs using propensity score (PS) analysis with a multiple-group structural equation model (SEM) design to examine differences between students who participated in two or more HIPs and those who did not (n = 3105). Results offered evidence of benefit to participation in two or more HIP experiences with positive and statistically significant differences in the perceived importance of postsecondary education in preparation for adult life across the analytic sample with doubly robust estimation techniques. Interaction effects for female students, students from low SES backgrounds, and students who are members of minoritized racial/ethnic populations were also identified. The findings offered evidence of post-graduation impact of cumulative participation in HIPs that can inform program development and student decision-making as well as the future use of analytic techniques such as PS analysis, doubly robust estimation, and sensitivity analysis to enhance measurement precision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Higher Education
Research in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Research in Higher Education publishes studies that examine issues pertaining to postsecondary education. The journal is open to studies using a wide range of methods, but has particular interest in studies that apply advanced quantitative research methods to issues in postsecondary education or address postsecondary education policy issues. Among the topics of interest to the journal are: access and retention; student success; equity; faculty issues; institutional productivity and assessment; postsecondary education governance; curriculum and instruction; state and federal higher education policy; and financing of postsecondary education. The journal encourages submissions from scholars in disciplines outside of higher education, and studies from outside the United States that address issues that are of interest to the readership. The journal will on occasion publish short notes of a methodological nature, literature reviews of topics pertaining to postsecondary research, and “research and practice” studies illustrating how postsecondary research can inform decision making.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Psychometric Properties of Quality Experience in Undergraduate Research Using Item Response Theory Discrimination or a Competitive Climate? Why Women Cannot Translate Their Better High School Grades into University Grades Mapping the Occupations of Recent Graduates. The Role of Academic Background in the Digital Era Less is more, or is it? Age and Gender Differences in How Students Build Momentum toward College Graduation The Relationship Between Low-Income College Students’ Time Use and Well-Being: A Mixed Methods Exploration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1