在大学医院实施全面临床风险管理系统。

IF 1.7 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2023.11.008
Wolfgang Buchberger , Marten Schmied , Michael Schomaker , Anca del Rio , Uwe Siebert
{"title":"在大学医院实施全面临床风险管理系统。","authors":"Wolfgang Buchberger ,&nbsp;Marten Schmied ,&nbsp;Michael Schomaker ,&nbsp;Anca del Rio ,&nbsp;Uwe Siebert","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2023.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span><span>Adverse events during hospital </span>treatment are common and can lead to serious harm. This study reports the implementation of a comprehensive </span>clinical risk management system in a university hospital and assesses the impact of clinical risk management on patient harms.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The clinical risk management system was rolled out over a period of eight years and consisted of a training of interdisciplinary risk management teams, external and internal risk audits, and the implementation of a critical incident reporting system (CIRS). The risks identified during the audits were analyzed according to the type, severity, and implementation of preventive measures. Other key figures of the risk management system were obtained from the annual risk reports. The number of liability cases was used as primary outcome measurement.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 1,104 risks identified during the risk audits, 56.2<!--> <!-->% were related to organization, 21.3<!--> <!-->% to documentation, 15.3<!--> <!-->% to treatment, and 7.2<!--> <!-->% to patient information and consent. The highest proportion of serious risks was found in the category organization (22.7<!--> <!-->%), the lowest in the category documentation (13.6<!--> <!-->%). Critical incident reporting identified between 241 and 370 critical incidents per year, for which in 79.5<!--> <!-->% to 83% preventive measures were implemented within twelve months. The frequency of incident reports per department correlated with the number of active risk managers and risk team meetings.</p><p>Compared with the years prior to the introduction of the clinical risk management system, an average annual reduction of harms by 60.1<!--> <!-->% (95% CI: 57.1; 63.1) was observed two years after the implementation was completed. On average, the rate of harms dropped by 5<!--> <!-->% per year for each 10<!--> <!-->% increase in roll-out of the clinical risk management system (incidence rate ratio: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93; 0.97) .</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results of this project demonstrate the effectiveness of clinical risk management in detecting treatment-related risks and in reducing harm to patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"184 ","pages":"Pages 18-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a comprehensive clinical risk management system in a university hospital\",\"authors\":\"Wolfgang Buchberger ,&nbsp;Marten Schmied ,&nbsp;Michael Schomaker ,&nbsp;Anca del Rio ,&nbsp;Uwe Siebert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zefq.2023.11.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span><span>Adverse events during hospital </span>treatment are common and can lead to serious harm. This study reports the implementation of a comprehensive </span>clinical risk management system in a university hospital and assesses the impact of clinical risk management on patient harms.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The clinical risk management system was rolled out over a period of eight years and consisted of a training of interdisciplinary risk management teams, external and internal risk audits, and the implementation of a critical incident reporting system (CIRS). The risks identified during the audits were analyzed according to the type, severity, and implementation of preventive measures. Other key figures of the risk management system were obtained from the annual risk reports. The number of liability cases was used as primary outcome measurement.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 1,104 risks identified during the risk audits, 56.2<!--> <!-->% were related to organization, 21.3<!--> <!-->% to documentation, 15.3<!--> <!-->% to treatment, and 7.2<!--> <!-->% to patient information and consent. The highest proportion of serious risks was found in the category organization (22.7<!--> <!-->%), the lowest in the category documentation (13.6<!--> <!-->%). Critical incident reporting identified between 241 and 370 critical incidents per year, for which in 79.5<!--> <!-->% to 83% preventive measures were implemented within twelve months. The frequency of incident reports per department correlated with the number of active risk managers and risk team meetings.</p><p>Compared with the years prior to the introduction of the clinical risk management system, an average annual reduction of harms by 60.1<!--> <!-->% (95% CI: 57.1; 63.1) was observed two years after the implementation was completed. On average, the rate of harms dropped by 5<!--> <!-->% per year for each 10<!--> <!-->% increase in roll-out of the clinical risk management system (incidence rate ratio: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93; 0.97) .</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results of this project demonstrate the effectiveness of clinical risk management in detecting treatment-related risks and in reducing harm to patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen\",\"volume\":\"184 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 18-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921723002180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921723002180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医院治疗过程中的不良事件很常见,可导致严重伤害。本研究报告了一家大学医院实施全面临床风险管理系统的情况,并评估了临床风险管理对患者伤害的影响:临床风险管理系统的实施历时八年,包括对跨学科风险管理团队的培训、外部和内部风险审计以及重大事件报告系统(CIRS)的实施。根据风险的类型、严重程度和预防措施的实施情况,对审计中发现的风险进行了分析。风险管理系统的其他关键数据来自年度风险报告。结果显示,在审计过程中发现的 1,104 项风险中,有 1,540 项被认定为风险:结果:在风险审计中发现的 1,104 项风险中,56.2% 与组织有关,21.3% 与文件有关,15.3% 与治疗有关,7.2% 与患者信息和同意有关。严重风险比例最高的是组织类别(22.7%),最低的是文件类别(13.6%)。重大事件报告每年发现 241 至 370 起重大事件,其中 79.5%至 83%在 12 个月内实施了预防措施。每个部门的事故报告频率与活跃的风险管理人员和风险小组会议的数量相关。与引入临床风险管理系统前几年相比,实施两年后观察到平均每年的伤害率降低了 60.1%(95% CI:57.1;63.1)。临床风险管理系统的推广每增加 10%,伤害率平均每年下降 5%(发生率比:0.95;95% CI:0.93;0.97):该项目的结果证明了临床风险管理在检测治疗相关风险和减少对患者的伤害方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation of a comprehensive clinical risk management system in a university hospital

Background

Adverse events during hospital treatment are common and can lead to serious harm. This study reports the implementation of a comprehensive clinical risk management system in a university hospital and assesses the impact of clinical risk management on patient harms.

Methods

The clinical risk management system was rolled out over a period of eight years and consisted of a training of interdisciplinary risk management teams, external and internal risk audits, and the implementation of a critical incident reporting system (CIRS). The risks identified during the audits were analyzed according to the type, severity, and implementation of preventive measures. Other key figures of the risk management system were obtained from the annual risk reports. The number of liability cases was used as primary outcome measurement.

Results

Of the 1,104 risks identified during the risk audits, 56.2 % were related to organization, 21.3 % to documentation, 15.3 % to treatment, and 7.2 % to patient information and consent. The highest proportion of serious risks was found in the category organization (22.7 %), the lowest in the category documentation (13.6 %). Critical incident reporting identified between 241 and 370 critical incidents per year, for which in 79.5 % to 83% preventive measures were implemented within twelve months. The frequency of incident reports per department correlated with the number of active risk managers and risk team meetings.

Compared with the years prior to the introduction of the clinical risk management system, an average annual reduction of harms by 60.1 % (95% CI: 57.1; 63.1) was observed two years after the implementation was completed. On average, the rate of harms dropped by 5 % per year for each 10 % increase in roll-out of the clinical risk management system (incidence rate ratio: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93; 0.97) .

Conclusion

The results of this project demonstrate the effectiveness of clinical risk management in detecting treatment-related risks and in reducing harm to patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
期刊最新文献
[Health care assistants in German primary care - A structural analysis]. [Clinical testing of the updated S3-level guideline for non-specific neck pain with physiotherapists and patients: A mixed-methods approach]. Ein neuer Ansatz für Versorgungsevaluationen: Erprobung des PopGroupers für Vergleichsgruppenbildung und Morbiditätsmessung am Beispiel der DMP KHK und Brustkrebs Übersetzung und Validitätsprüfung der Selbsteinschätzungsskala für digitale Kompetenzen Pflegestudierender Status quo des Antibiotic Stewardship in deutschen Krankenhäusern aus der Perspektive der Krankenhausapotheker*innen – Ergebnisse der ADKA-Umfrage 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1