高等教育中的面对面学习与混合式学习:生物科学学生成果的定量分析

IF 8.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1186/s41239-023-00435-0
Claire V. Harper, Lucy M. McCormick, Linda Marron
{"title":"高等教育中的面对面学习与混合式学习:生物科学学生成果的定量分析","authors":"Claire V. Harper, Lucy M. McCormick, Linda Marron","doi":"10.1186/s41239-023-00435-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic caused a rapid seismic shift to online delivery in otherwise face-to-face higher education settings worldwide. This quantitative research study sought to investigate the effect of different delivery styles and assessment types on student outcomes. Specifically, grades achieved by first year undergraduate Biological Science students at a UK Higher Education institution were compared from seven modules across two different academic years, namely 2018–2019 and 2020–2021. The academic year 2018–2019 was delivered in the traditional face-to-face manner whereas the 2020–2021 method of delivery was via blended learning. The results showed that four of the seven modules were negatively affected by the transition from face-to-face to blended delivery (p &lt; 0.05, T-test). One module was unaffected (p &gt; 0.05, T-test) and the remaining two modules were positively affected (p &lt; 0.05, T-test). However, the percentage of students requiring reassessments increased with blended learning delivery although this was not significant (p &lt; 0.05, T-test). In summary, the majority of individual module marks decreased with blended learning compared to face-to-face delivery, with an associated increase in required reassessments. Although there are positive benefits to incorporating an element of online learning for students, it is important to utilise this information in future module delivery planning to support the varying student cohorts of the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":13871,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education","volume":"197 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Face-to-face vs. blended learning in higher education: a quantitative analysis of biological science student outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Claire V. Harper, Lucy M. McCormick, Linda Marron\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41239-023-00435-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic caused a rapid seismic shift to online delivery in otherwise face-to-face higher education settings worldwide. This quantitative research study sought to investigate the effect of different delivery styles and assessment types on student outcomes. Specifically, grades achieved by first year undergraduate Biological Science students at a UK Higher Education institution were compared from seven modules across two different academic years, namely 2018–2019 and 2020–2021. The academic year 2018–2019 was delivered in the traditional face-to-face manner whereas the 2020–2021 method of delivery was via blended learning. The results showed that four of the seven modules were negatively affected by the transition from face-to-face to blended delivery (p &lt; 0.05, T-test). One module was unaffected (p &gt; 0.05, T-test) and the remaining two modules were positively affected (p &lt; 0.05, T-test). However, the percentage of students requiring reassessments increased with blended learning delivery although this was not significant (p &lt; 0.05, T-test). In summary, the majority of individual module marks decreased with blended learning compared to face-to-face delivery, with an associated increase in required reassessments. Although there are positive benefits to incorporating an element of online learning for students, it is important to utilise this information in future module delivery planning to support the varying student cohorts of the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"197 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00435-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00435-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 大流行导致全球范围内原本面对面授课的高等教育迅速转向在线授课。这项定量研究旨在探讨不同授课方式和评估类型对学生成绩的影响。具体而言,研究人员比较了英国一所高等教育机构生物科学专业一年级本科生在两个不同学年(即 2018-2019 学年和 2020-2021 学年)七个模块中取得的成绩。2018-2019学年采用传统的面授方式,而2020-2021学年则采用混合式学习方式。结果显示,从面授到混合式教学的转变对七个模块中的四个模块产生了负面影响(p < 0.05,T 检验)。一个模块未受影响(p >0.05,T 检验),其余两个模块受积极影响(p <0.05,T 检验)。然而,在混合式教学实施过程中,需要重新评估的学生比例有所增加,但影响不大(p < 0.05,T 检验)。总之,与面对面教学相比,混合式教学的大部分单个模块分数都有所下降,而需要重新评估的学生人数也相应增加。尽管将在线学习元素融入学生的学习中会带来积极的好处,但重要的是要在未来的模块教学规划中利用这些信息,以支持未来不同的学生群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Face-to-face vs. blended learning in higher education: a quantitative analysis of biological science student outcomes

The COVID-19 pandemic caused a rapid seismic shift to online delivery in otherwise face-to-face higher education settings worldwide. This quantitative research study sought to investigate the effect of different delivery styles and assessment types on student outcomes. Specifically, grades achieved by first year undergraduate Biological Science students at a UK Higher Education institution were compared from seven modules across two different academic years, namely 2018–2019 and 2020–2021. The academic year 2018–2019 was delivered in the traditional face-to-face manner whereas the 2020–2021 method of delivery was via blended learning. The results showed that four of the seven modules were negatively affected by the transition from face-to-face to blended delivery (p < 0.05, T-test). One module was unaffected (p > 0.05, T-test) and the remaining two modules were positively affected (p < 0.05, T-test). However, the percentage of students requiring reassessments increased with blended learning delivery although this was not significant (p < 0.05, T-test). In summary, the majority of individual module marks decreased with blended learning compared to face-to-face delivery, with an associated increase in required reassessments. Although there are positive benefits to incorporating an element of online learning for students, it is important to utilise this information in future module delivery planning to support the varying student cohorts of the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
4.70%
发文量
59
审稿时长
76.7 days
期刊介绍: This journal seeks to foster the sharing of critical scholarly works and information exchange across diverse cultural perspectives in the fields of technology-enhanced and digital learning in higher education. It aims to advance scientific knowledge on the human and personal aspects of technology use in higher education, while keeping readers informed about the latest developments in applying digital technologies to learning, training, research, and management.
期刊最新文献
Mediation/moderation effects of engagement, foreign language enjoyment, and ambiguity tolerance in metaverse-based foreign language learning Comparison of generative AI performance on undergraduate and postgraduate written assessments in the biomedical sciences Simple techniques to bypass GenAI text detectors: implications for inclusive education Understanding college students’ test anxiety in asynchronous online courses: the mediating role of emotional engagement Rethinking assessment strategies to improve authentic representations of learning: using blogs as a creative assessment alternative to develop professional skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1